Advertisement

An overview on the applications of the hesitant fuzzy sets in group decision-making: Theory, support and methods

  • Zeshui XuEmail author
  • Shen Zhang
Review Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the characteristics of hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs), one hesitant fuzzy element (HFE), which is the basic component of HFSs, can express the evaluation values of multiple decision makers (DMs) on the same alternative under a certain attribute. Thus, the HFS has its unique advantages in group decision making (GDM). Based on which, many scholars have conducted in-depth research on the applications of HFSs in GDM. We have viewed lots of relevant literature and divided the existing studies into three categories: theory, support and methods. In this paper, we elaborate on hesitant fuzzy GDM from these three aspects. The first aspect is mainly about the introduction of HFSs, HFPRs and some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators. The second aspect describes the consensus process under hesitant fuzzy environment, which is an important support for a complete decisionmaking process. In the third aspect, we introduce seven hesitant fuzzy GDM approaches, which can be applied in GDM under different decision-making conditions. Finally, we summarize the research status of hesitant fuzzy GDM and put forward some directions of future research.

Keywords

hesitant fuzzy set hesitant fuzzy preference relation group decision-making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acar C, Beskese A, Temur G T (2018). Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(39): 18059–18076Google Scholar
  2. Alcantud J C R, Giarlotta A (2019). Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: A novel model for group decision making. Information Fusion, 46: 63–76Google Scholar
  3. Asan U, Kadaifci C, Bozdag E, Soyer A, Serdarasan S (2018). A new approach to DEMATEL based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 66: 34–49Google Scholar
  4. Ashtiani M, Azgomi M A (2016). A hesitant fuzzy model of computational trust considering hesitancy, vagueness and uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing, 42: 18–37Google Scholar
  5. Camerer C (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics, 1(2): 163–183zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen N, Xu Z S (2015). Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II Approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Information Sciences, 292: 175–197Google Scholar
  7. Chen N, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2013a). Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(4): 2197–2211MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen N, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2013b). Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowledge- Based Systems, 37: 528–540Google Scholar
  9. Chen N, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2015). The ELECTRE I multi-criteria decision making method based on hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(03): 621–657Google Scholar
  10. Cheng S H (2018). Autocratic decision making using group recommen-dations based on hesitant fuzzy sets for green hotels selection and bidders selection. Information Sciences, 467: 604–617MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. De S K, Sana S S (2017). Multi-criterion multi-attribute decision-making for an EOQ model in a hesitant fuzzy environment. Pacific Science Review A. Natural Science and Engineering, 17: 61–68Google Scholar
  12. Dincer H, Yuksel S, Martinez L (2019). Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 115: 152–171Google Scholar
  13. Ding J, Xu Z S, Zhao N (2017). An interactive approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with incomplete weight information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3): 2523–2536zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Farhadinia B (2014). Distance and similarity measures for higher order hesitant fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 55: 43–48zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Farhadinia B (2016a). Hesitant fuzzy set lexicographical ordering and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Information Sciences, 327: 233–245MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Farhadinia B (2016b). Utility of correlation measures for weighted hesitant fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis problems. Mathematical Modelling and Applications, 1(2): 36–45Google Scholar
  17. Galo N R, Calache L D D R, Carpinetti L C R (2018). A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRI TRI. International Journal of Production Economics, 202: 182–196Google Scholar
  18. He Y D, He Z, Shi L X, Meng S S (2016a). Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99: 63–77Google Scholar
  19. He Y, Xu Z S (2017). A consensus reaching model for hesitant information with different preference structures. Knowledge-Based Systems, 135: 99–112Google Scholar
  20. He Y, Xu Z S, Gu J (2016b). An approach to group decision making with hesitant information and its application in credit risk evaluation of enterprises. Applied Soft Computing, 43: 159–169Google Scholar
  21. Hwang C L, Yoon K (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: SpringerzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang HM, Kwong C K, Park WY (2017). Probabilistic fuzzy regression approach for preference modeling. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 64: 286–294Google Scholar
  23. Jin F F, Ni Z W, Chen H Y, Li Y P, Zhou L G (2016). Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information measures. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101: 103–115Google Scholar
  24. Lan J B, Jin R F, Zheng A Y, Hu M M (2017). Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: Applications to multiple attribute decision making. Operations Research Perspectives, 4: 67–73MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Li D Q, Zeng WY, Li J H (2015). New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 40: 11–16Google Scholar
  26. Liang D C, Xu Z S (2017). The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 60: 167–179Google Scholar
  27. Liao H C, Xu Z S (2013). A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12(4): 373–392MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Liao H C, Xu Z S (2014a). Some new hybrid weighted aggregation operators under hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(4): 1601–1617MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Liao H C, Xu Z S (2014b). Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(1): 65–72MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Liao H C, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2014). Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(1): 47–76Google Scholar
  31. Mahmoudi A, Sadi-Nezhad S, Makui A, Vakili M R (2016). An extension on PROMETHEE based on the typical hesitant fuzzy sets to solve multi-attribute decision-making problem. Kybernetes, 45(8): 1213–1231Google Scholar
  32. Meng F Y, An Q X (2017). A new approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 127: 1–15Google Scholar
  33. Meng F Y, Chen X H, Zhang Q (2015). Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy Shapley hybrid operators and their application in multiattribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 28: 599–607Google Scholar
  34. Osiro L, Lima-Junior F R, Carpinetti L C R (2018). A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 964–978Google Scholar
  35. Peng D H, Gao C Y, Gao Z F (2013). Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(8): 5837–5850MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng J J, Wang J Q, Wang J, Yang L J, Chen X H (2015). An extension of ELECTRE to multi-criteria decision-making problems with multihesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 307: 113–126MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Perez-Fernandez R, Alonso P, Bustince H, Diaz I, Montes S (2016). Applications of finite interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Information Sciences, 326: 89–101MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Qian G, Wang H, Feng X Q (2013). Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37: 357–365Google Scholar
  39. Qin J D, Liu X W, Pedrycy W (2016). Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 41: 428–452Google Scholar
  40. Sevastjanov P, Dymova L (2015). Generalized operations on hesitant fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. Information Sciences, 311: 39–58MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun G D, Guan X, Yi X, Zhou Z (2018). An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications. Applied Soft Computing, 68: 249–267Google Scholar
  42. Tan C Q, Yi W T, Chen X H (2015). Hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multicriteria decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 26: 325–349Google Scholar
  43. Tian X L, Xu Z S, Fujita H (2018). Sequential funding the venture project or not? A prospect consensus process with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161: 172–184Google Scholar
  44. Torra V (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25: 529–539zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Wan S P, Qin Y L, Dong J Y (2017). A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees. Knowledge-Based Systems, 138: 232–248Google Scholar
  46. Wei G W (2012). Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowledge- Based Systems, 31: 176–182Google Scholar
  47. Wu Z B, Jin B M, Xu J P (2018). Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 67: 691–705Google Scholar
  48. Wu Z B, Xu J P (2018). A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Information Fusion, 41: 217–231Google Scholar
  49. Xia M M, Xu Z S (2013). Managing hesitant information GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledgebased Systems, 21(06): 865–897MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Xia M M, Xu Z S (2011a). Some techniques for aggregating hesitant and intuitionistic information based on Sasty’s 1–9 scale. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  51. Xia M M, Xu Z S (2011b). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52(3): 395–407MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Xia M M, Xu Z S, Chen N (2013). Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(2): 259–279Google Scholar
  53. Xu Y J, Li C Y, Wen X W (2018). Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 11(1): 101–119Google Scholar
  54. Xu Y J, Rui D, Wang H M (2017a). A dynamically weight adjustment in the consensus reaching process for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Systems Science, 48(6): 1311–1321MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu Y J, Cabrerizo F J, Herrera-Viedma N (2017b). A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Applied Soft Computing, 58: 265–284Google Scholar
  56. Xu Y J, Chen L, Rodriguez RM, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016). Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 99: 71–78Google Scholar
  57. Xu Z S, Xia M M (2011). On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26(5): 410–425zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu Z S, Zhou W (2017). Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(4): 481–503MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu Z S, Zhang X L (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52: 53–64Google Scholar
  60. Yu D J, Zhang W Y, Xu Y J (2013). Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52: 1–10Google Scholar
  61. Zhang S, Xu Z S, Wu H Y (2018a). Fusions and preference relations based on probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information in group decision making. Soft Computing, DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3465-6Google Scholar
  62. Zhang S, Xu Z S, He Y (2017). Operations and integrations of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information in decision making. Information Fusion, 38: 1–11Google Scholar
  63. Zhang X L, Xu Z S (2014a). Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 75: 217–229Google Scholar
  64. Zhang X L, Xu Z S (2014b). The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowledge- Based Systems, 61: 48–58Google Scholar
  65. Zhang X L, Xu Z S (2015). Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2): 873–884MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang ZM(2013). Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 234: 150–181Google Scholar
  67. Zhang Z M (2016). Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Applied Soft Computing, 46: 37–59Google Scholar
  68. Zhang Z M, Wang C, Tian D Z, Li K (2014). Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 67: 116–138Google Scholar
  69. Zhang Z M, Wang C, Tian X D (2015a). A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 86: 77–101Google Scholar
  70. Zhang Z M, Wang C, Tian X D (2015b). Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 36: 1–23Google Scholar
  71. Zhang Z M, Wu C (2014a). Deriving the priority weights from hesitant multiplicative preference relations in group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 25: 107–117Google Scholar
  72. Zhang Z M, Wu C (2014b). Weighted hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multi-criteria decision making. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 4(8): 1091–1123Google Scholar
  73. Zhang Z, Kou X Y, Dong Q X (2018b). Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 98: 118–128Google Scholar
  74. Zhang Z, Kou X Y, Yu W Y, Guo C H (2018c). On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 143: 115–126Google Scholar
  75. Zhao N, Xu Z S, Ren Z L (2015). On typical hesitant fuzzy prioritized “or” operator in multi-attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(1): 73–100Google Scholar
  76. Zhao X F, Lin R, Wei GW(2014). Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4): 1086–1094Google Scholar
  77. Zhou W, Xu Z S (2017a). Expected hesitant VaR for tail decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 60: 297–311Google Scholar
  78. Zhou W, Xu Z S (2017b). Group consistency and group decision making under uncertain probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference environment. Information Sciences, 414: 276–288Google Scholar
  79. Zhou W, Xu Z S (2018). Probability calculation and element optimization of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on expected consistency. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(3): 1367–1378Google Scholar
  80. Zhou W, Xu Z S, Chen M H (2015). Preference relations based on hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application in group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87: 163–175Google Scholar
  81. Zhu B (2014). Decision method for research and application based on preference relations. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Southeast UniversityGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhu B, Xu Z S (2014). Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3): 794–801MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhu B, Xu Z S (2018). Probability-hesitant fuzzy sets and the representation of preference relations. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3): 1029–1040Google Scholar
  84. Zhu B, Xu Z S, Xu J P (2014). Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(8): 1328–1337Google Scholar
  85. Zhu B, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2012). Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means. Information Sciences, 2015: 72–85MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhu B, Xu Z S, Xia M M (2013). Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12): 1831–1840Google Scholar
  87. Zhu B, Xu Z S, Zhang R, Hong M (2015). Generalized analytic network process. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1): 277–288MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhu B, Xu Z S, Zhang R, Hong M (2016). Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2): 602–614MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations