Advertisement

Improved Regression-Cum-Ratio Estimators Using Information on Two Auxiliary Variables Dealing with Subsampling Technique of Non-Response

  • G. N. Singh
  • M. UsmanEmail author
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, we have suggested some improved regression-cum-ratio-type estimators to estimate the population mean using two auxiliary variables in two different situations of non-response. The bias and mean square error are obtained under large sample approximation. After analysis of a numerical illustration, it has been found that the proposed class of estimators is more efficient than Hansen and Hurwitz (J Am Stat Assoc 41:517–529, 1946) usual unbiased estimator, conventional ratio and regression estimators, Singh and Kumar (Braz J Probab Stat 25(2):205–217, 2011) estimators, Muneer et. al. (Commun Stat Theory Methods 46(5):2181–2192, 2017) estimators, Kumar et. al. (J Stat Comput Simul 88(18):3694–3707, 2018) estimators and Akingbade and Okafer (Pak J Stat Oper Res 15(2):329–340, 2019) estimators. We also consider a simulation study under which the estimated performance of the proposed class of estimators is evaluated.

Keywords

Population mean Study variable Two auxiliary variables Efficiency Non-response 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 62D05 Secondary 62P20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are very thankful to the Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, for providing financial assistance and necessary infrastructure to accomplish the present research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Akingbade TJ, Okafor FC (2019) A class of ratio-type estimator using two auxiliary variables for estimating the population mean with some known population parameters. Pak J Stat Oper Res 15(2):329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New WorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN (1946) The problem of non-response in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc 41:517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hazra R (2015) Combination of two exponential ratio type estimators for estimating population mean using auxiliary variable with double sampling in presence of non. Int J Sci Res Publ 5(6):126–133Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hussain Z, Shabbir J (2011) Improved estimation of mean in randomized response models. Hacet J Math Stat 40(1):91–101MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussain Z, Shabbir J (2011) An estimation of sensitive proportion utilizing higher order moments of auxiliary variable. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2(2):121–125Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hussain Z, Shabbir J, Riaz M (2011) Baysian estimation using Warners randomized response model through simple and mixture prior distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 40:159–176Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khare BB, Sinha RR (2011) Estimation of population mean using multiauxiliary characters with sampling the non-respondents. Stat Transit New Ser 12(1):45–56Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khare BB, Sinha RR (2007) Estimation of the ratio of the two population means using multi auxiliary characters in the presence of non-response. In: Pandey BN (ed) Statistical techniques in life testing, reliability, sampling theory and quality control. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 163–171Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khare BB, Srivastava S (1993) Estimation of population mean using auxiliary character in presence of non-response. Natl Acad Sci Lett 16:111–114zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar S, Trehan M, Joorel JS (2018) A simulation study: estimation of population mean using two auxiliary variables in stratified random sampling. J Stat Comput Simul 88(18):3694–3707MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar S, Viswanathaiah M (2014) Population mean estimation with sub sampling the non-respondents using two phase sampling. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 13(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahdizadeh M, Zamanzade E (2016) Kernel-based estimation of P(X \(>\) Y ) in ranked set sampling. Stat Oper Res Trans (SORT) 40(2):243–266MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahdizadeh M, Zamanzade E (2019) Efficient body fat estimation using multistage pair ranked set sampling. Stat Methods Med Res 28(1):223–234MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohanty S (1967) Combination of regression and ratio estimates. J Ind Stat Assoc 5:1–14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muneer S, Shabbir J, Khalil A (2017) Estimation of finite population mean in simple random sampling and stratified random sampling using two auxiliary variables. Commun Stat Theory Methods 46(5):2181–2192MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muttalak HA, Mcdonald LL (1992) Ranked set sampling and line intercept method: a more efficient procedure. Biom J 34:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okafor FC, Lee H (2000) Double sampling for ratio and regression estimation with subsampling the non-respondents. Surv Methodol 26:183–188Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olkin I (1958) Multivariate ratio estimation for finite population. Biometrika 45:154–165MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao PSRS (1986) Ratio estimation with sub sampling the non-respondents. Surv Methodol 12:217–230Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao PSRS (1987) Ratio and regression estimates with sub sampling the non respondents. Paper presented at a special contributed session of the International Statistical Association Meeting, Sept. Tokyo, Japan, pp 2–16Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarndal CE, Lundstrom S (2005) Estimation in surveys with non-response. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shabbir J, Gupta S (2011) On estimating the finite population mean in simple and stratified random sampling. Commun Stat Theory Methods 40(2):199–212MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shabbir J, Gupta S (2017) Estimation of finite population mean using two auxiliary variables in stratified two-phase sampling. Commun Stat Simul Comput 46(2):1238–1256MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2008) A regression approach to the estimation of the finite population mean in the presence of non-response. Aust NZ J Stat 50(4):395–402MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2008) A general family of estimators of the finite population ratio, product and mean using two phase sampling scheme in the presence of non-response. J Stat Theor Pract 2(4):677–692MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2009) A general class of estimators of the population mean in survey sampling using auxiliary information with sub sampling the non-respondents. Korean J Appl Stat 22:387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2009) A general procedure of estimating the population mean in the presence of non-response under double sampling using auxiliary information. SORT 33:71–84MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2010) Estimation of mean in the presence of non-response using two phase sampling scheme. Stat Pap 51:559–582MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2010) Improved estimation of population mean under double sampling with sub-sampling the non-respondents. J Stat Plan Infer 140(9):2536–2550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh HP, Kumar S (2011) Combination of regression and ratio estimate in presence of non response. Braz J Prob Stat 25(2):205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Srivastava SK (1971) A generalized estimator for the mean of a finite population using multi-auxiliary information. J Am Stat Assoc 66:404–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zamanzade E, Mahdizadeh M (2017) A more efficient proportion estimator in ranked set sampling. Stat Probab Lett 129:28–33MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zamanzade E, Mahdizadeh M (2018) Estimating the population proportion in pair ranked set sampling with application to air quality monitoring. J Appl Stat 45(3):426–437MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zamanzade E, Mahdizadeh M (2019) Using ranked set sampling with extreme ranks in estimating the population proportion. Stat Methods Med Res.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280218823793 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations