Advertisement

Bayesian A-Optimal Design of Experiment with Quantitative and Qualitative Responses

  • Lulu KangEmail author
  • Xiao Huang
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Algorithms, Analysis and Advanced Methodologies in the Design of Experiments

Abstract

We consider the problem of A-optimal design of experiment under a Bayesian probabilistic model with both categorical and continuous response variables. The utility function of the local design problem is derived by applying Bayesian experimental design framework. We also develop an efficient optimization algorithm to obtain the local optimal design by combining the particle swarm optimization and the blocked coordinate descent methods. In addition, we discuss two different ways of constructing the global optimal design based on the algorithm for local optimal design. Simulation studies are presented to illustrate the efficiency of our approach.

Keywords

Bayesian A-optimal design Logistic model Multivariate responses PSO 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation Grants CMMI-1435902.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Deng X, Jin R (2015) QQ models: joint modeling for quantitative and qualitative quality responses in manufacturing systems. Technometrics 57(3):320–331MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kang L, Kang X, Deng X, Jin R (2018) A Bayesian hierarchical model for quantitative and qualitative responses. J Qual Technol 50(3):290–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kang L (2016) Bayesian d-optimal design of experiments with continuous and binary responses. In: International conference on design of experiments (ICODOE-2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eberhart RC, Kennedy J et al (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, vol 1, pp 39–43. New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lukemire J, Mandal A, Wong WK (2016) Using particle swarm optimization to search for locally \(d\)-optimal designs for mixed factor experiments with binary response. arXiv preprintarXiv:1602.02187Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen R-B, Chang S-P, Wang W, Tung H-C, Wong WK (2015) Minimax optimal designs via particle swarm optimization methods. Stat Comput 25(5):975–988MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong WK, Chen R-B, Huang C-C, Wang W (2015) A modified particle swarm optimization technique for finding optimal designs for mixture models. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0124720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen R-B, Hsu Y-W, Hung Y, Wang W (2014) Discrete particle swarm optimization for constructing uniform design on irregular regions. Comput Stat Data Anal 72:282–297MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leatherman E, Dean A, Santner T (2014) Computer experiment designs via particle swarm optimization. In: Topics in statistical simulation, pp 309–317. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang L, Joseph VR (2012) Bayesian optimal single arrays for robust parameter design. TechnometricsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu CFJ, Hamada MS (2011) Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization, vol 552. Wiley, HobokenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ai M, Kang L, Joseph VR (2009) Bayesian optimal blocking of factorial designs. J Stat Plan Inference 139(9):3319–3328MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joseph VR (2006) A Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of fractionated experiments. Technometrics 48(2):219–229MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindley DV (1972) Bayesian statistics: a review, vol. 2. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaloner K, Verdinelli I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: a review. Stat Sci 10(3):273–304MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryan EG, Drovandi CC, McGree JM, Pettitt AN (2016) A review of modern computational algorithms for Bayesian optimal design. Int Stat Rev 84(1):128–154MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Overstall AM, Woods DC (2017) Bayesian design of experiments using approximate coordinate exchange. Technometrics 59(4):458–470MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drovandi CC, Tran M-N et al (2018) Improving the efficiency of fully Bayesian optimal design of experiments using randomised quasi-monte carlo. Bayesian Anal 13(1):139–162MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woods DC, Overstall AM, Adamou M, Waite TW (2017) Bayesian design of experiments for generalized linear models and dimensional analysis with industrial and scientific application. Qual Eng 29(1):91–103Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alexanderian A, Gloor PJ, Ghattas O et al (2016) On Bayesian a- and d-optimal experimental designs in infinite dimensions. Bayesian Anal 11(3):671–695MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huan X, Marzouk YM (2013) Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems. J Comput Phys 232(1):288–317MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fedorov VV (1972) Theory of optimal experiments (translated by W. J. Studden and E. M. Klimko, eds.). Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kiefer J (1985) Collected papers, vol 3. Surendra KumarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu Y (2011) D-optimal designs via a cocktail algorithm. Stat Comput 21(4):475–481MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang M, Biedermann S, Tang E (2013) On optimal designs for nonlinear models: a general and efficient algorithm. J Am Stat Assoc 108(504):1411–1420MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations