Journal of Rubber Research

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 203–211 | Cite as

Room temperature self-healable natural rubber

  • Nuur Laila Najwa Thajudin
  • Nur Syamsinar Sardi
  • Mohd Hafiz Zainol
  • Raa Khimi ShuibEmail author
Original Paper


In this work, a novel self-healing natural rubber was developed, and the concepts of mixing both covalent and reversible ionic crosslinks bonds were proposed. The developed materials have the capability of repairing themselves and recovering functionality when they are damaged without the need for detection. Evidence that covalent and reversible ionic crosslinks bonds had occurred was determined by the equilibrium swelling test. The tensile properties of the cured rubbers before and after the healing process were measured using a universal tensile tester to obtain healing efficiency of the materials. The results revealed that the developed self-healing natural rubber was able to recover 60% of its initial mechanical properties in a minute and almost 100% in 10 min at room temperature without the aid of any external resources. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the fracture area recuperated with a scar mark after the healing process. Some of the potential products that could benefit from the advantages of these materials include tires, industrial rubber good, cable, hoses, belting, bearing, mounting and foot-wares.


Self-healing Natural rubber Zinc thiolate Reversible bonding Room temperature 



The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Ministry of Education Malaysia for FRGS grant 203/PBAHAN/6071349.


Funding have been received from Universiti Sains Malaysia

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Bekas DG et al (2016) Self-healing materials: a review of advances in materials, evaluation, characterization and monitoring techniques. Compos B Eng 87(Supplement C):92–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binder WH (2013) Self-healing polymers: from principles to applications. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaiszik BJ et al (2010) Self-healing polymers and composites. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peponi L et al (2016) Smart materials: polymers and nanocomposites. Modification of polymer properties. William Andrew, Norwich, p 131Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu DY, Rong MZ, Zhang MQ (2015) Self-healing polymeric materials based on microencapsulated healing agents: from design to preparation. Prog Polym Sci 49–50(Supplement C):175–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Syrett JA, Becer CR, Haddleton DM (2010) Self-healing and self-mendable polymers. Polym Chem 1(7):978–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu DY, Meure S, Solomon D (2008) Self-healing polymeric materials: a review of recent developments. Prog Polym Sci 33(5):479–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuan Y et al (2008) Self healing in polymers and polymer composites. Concepts, realization and outlook: a review. Exp Polym Lett 2(4):238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang MQ, Rong MZ (2011) Self-healing polymers and polymer composites. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhong N, Post W (2015) Self-repair of structural and functional composites with intrinsically self-healing polymer matrices: A review. Compos A. 69(Supplement C):226–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Araya-Hermosilla R et al (2016) Intrinsic self-healing thermoset through covalent and hydrogen bonding interactions. Eur Polym J 81:186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guimard NK et al (2012) Current trends in the field of self-healing materials. Macromol Chem Phys 213(2):131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman MA et al (2013) Autonomic self-healing in epoxidized natural rubber. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(4):1494–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin R et al (2016) Dynamic sulfur chemistry as a key tool in the design of self-healing polymers. Smart Mater Struct 25(8):084017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hernández M et al (2016) Turning vulcanized natural rubber into a self-healing polymer: effect of the disulfide/polysulfide ratio. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(10):5776–5784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu C et al (2016) Design of “Zn2 + salt-bondings” cross-linked carboxylated styrene butadiene rubber with reprocessing and recycling ability via rearrangements of ionic cross-linkings. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(12):6981–6990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang Y, Lu X, Wang W (2017) A tough polyurethane elastomer with self-healing ability. Mater Des 127:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang D-D et al (2017) A self-healing PDMS elastomer based on acylhydrazone groups and the role of hydrogen bonds. Polymer 120:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu C et al (2016) Design of self-healing supramolecular rubbers by introducing ionic cross-links into natural rubber via a controlled vulcanization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(27):17728–17737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nie Y et al (2010) Cure kinetics and morphology of natural rubber reinforced by the in situ polymerization of zinc dimethacrylate. J Appl Polym Sci 115(1):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Malaysian Rubber Board 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuur Laila Najwa Thajudin
    • 1
  • Nur Syamsinar Sardi
    • 1
  • Mohd Hafiz Zainol
    • 1
  • Raa Khimi Shuib
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, USM Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations