Journal of Rubber Research

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 119–126 | Cite as

Wear and thermal properties of carbon fiber reinforced silicone rubber/fluorine rubber composites

  • Weili WuEmail author
  • Xiang Li
Original Paper


Wear and high–low temperature resistance composites with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties were preparation by carbon fiber (CF) reinforced silicone rubber (MVQ)/fluorine rubber (FKM), the coupling agent was used as a compatibilizer. The effect of coupling agent type and content on mechanical properties of CF/MVQ/FKM composites was investigated, the interaction between coupling agent and composites was studied by infrared spectrum and X-ray photo electron spectroscopy, the surface morphology and phase composition of composites were observed by atomic force microscope and infrared imaging technology, the thermal properties of composites were studied by dynamic thermomechanical analysis and thermogravimetric analysis. The results showed that the coupling agents crosslinked with CF and matrix, the best coupling agent was (3-mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (KH590), and the content was 2 phr (parts per hundred rubber), the wear of KH590/CF/MVQ/FKM composites decreased from 0.0314 to 0.0283 cm3 km−1, the Tg reduced from – 20 to − 34 °C, the initial decomposition temperature increased from 231 to 304 °C compared with FKM.


Composites CF/MVQ/FKM Silane coupling agents Wear Thermal properties 



This work was financially supported by Fundamental Research Funds in Heilongjiang Provincial Universities, China (No: YSTSXK201864).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


  1. 1.
    Zhao XY, Wang SF (2018) Thermal, mechanical properties and morphology of epoxy resins modified with light pyrolysis natural rubber. Adv Polym Tech 37:2541–2551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yangthong H, Pichaiyut S, Jumrat S, Wisunthorn S, Nakason C (2018) Novel natural rubber composites with geopolymer filler. Adv Polym Tech 37:2651–2662. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moghaddamzadeh S, Rodrigue D (2018) The effect of polyester recycled tire fibers mixed with ground tire rubber on polyethylene composites. Part I: morphological analysis. Prog Rubber Plast Re 34:200–220. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunwant D, Sah PL, Zaidi MGH (2018) Morphology and micromechanics of liquid rubber toughened epoxies. E-Polymers 18:511–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra RM, Rai JSP (2018) Preparation and properties of nanocomposites based on polyetherimide (PEI)/silicone rubber reinforced with halloysite nanotubes. Indian J Pure Ap Phy 56:787–791Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen YK, Gong Z, Cao LM, Wang YH, Yuan DS, Xu CH (2018) Novel fluorosilicone thermoplastic vulcanizates prepared via core-shell dynamic vulcanization: effect of fluororubber/silicone rubber ratio on morphology, crystallization behavior, and mechanical properties. Polym Adv Technol 29:1456–1468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang CY, Wen L, Ming WW, An QL, Chen M (2018) Experimental study on effects of fiber cutting angle in milling of high-strength unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 232:1813–1824. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ye CS, Zhang RB, An ZM, Wang BL (2018) A machinable carbon aerogel composite with a low thermal conductivity and enhanced mechanical properties. Adv Appl Ceram 117:468–475. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu WL, Wang J (2018) Effect of KH550 on the preparation and compatibility of carbon fibers reinforced silicone rubber composites. Silicon 10:1903–1910. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choi WK, Park GY, Kim BS, Se MK (2018) Effect of silane coupling agent on the creep behavior and mechanical properties of carbon fibers/acrylonitrile butadiene rubber composites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18:6220–6227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bulatovic VO, Mihaljevic A, Bajsic EG (2018) Mechanical and interfacial properties of compatibilized polyurethane blends. Polym Eng Sci 58:1911–1922. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    George S, Sushama CM, Nair AB (2017) Efficiencies of dipolymer rubber blends (EPDM\FKM) using common weight data envelopment analysis. Mater Res-Ibero-Am J 20:1722–1728. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moezzi MD, Karrabi M, Jahani Y (2017) Thermal tensile, and dynamic mechanical properties of PVDF/FKM blends in different curing systems. Polym-Korea 41:250–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu L, Qu P, Zhou R, Wang B, Liao S (2017) Green synthesis of reduced graphene oxide and its reinforcing effect on natural rubber composites. High Perform Polym 27:486–496. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang Y, Zhao XJ, Peng GR, Liu WP (2018) Effects of nitrile rubber and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on damage recovery and physical mechanical properties of carbon fiber–reinforced epoxy composites. High Perform Polym 30:856–863. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tavakkoli H, Meibod MP, Frounchi M, Dadbin S (2011) Study and production of silicone rubber and polyethylene alloy. J Compos Mater 24:669–677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang CC, Zhang YF, Wang ZB (2017) Mechanical properties, morphology, and mullins effect of thermoplastic vulcanizates based on ethylene-vinyl acetatecopolymer/ethylene -vinyl acetate rubber. J Compos Mater 30:827–839. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Malaysian Rubber Board 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringQiqihar UniversityQiqiharChina

Personalised recommendations