Advertisement

Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1179–1189 | Cite as

Influence of Air Gap Volume on Achieving Steady-State Velocity of Detonation

  • Eugie KabweEmail author
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

The velocity of detonation (VOD) is a significant property considered when rating an explosive. It may be quantified as a confined or unconfined velocity. The confined velocity is the rate at which the detonation wave propagates through an explosive within a blast hole or any restrained space. The unconfined velocity emanates when an explosive is detonated in the open. However, the confined velocity is more significant as explosives are usually employed under a definite degree of confinement. This paper evaluates the increment of air deck volume and its effect on the VOD. The air gap (air deck) volume is increased stepwise from 10 to 30% of the total blast hole volume by reducing the stemming height in the collar zone. Thereafter, the VOD estimation in the 172-mm-diameter explosive column is conducted using the Dáutriche technique. It is observed that the VOD reduced with the increasing air deck volume and detonation failure is high when 30% of the blast hole volume is replaced with air deck. It is deduced that the increment of the air deck volume has an effect on the attenuation of the steady-state VOD.

Keywords

Blasting Confinement Density Emulsion Velocity of Detonation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Arvanitidis I, Nyberg U, Ouchterlony F (2004) The diameter effect on detonation properties of cylinder test experiments with emulsion E682. SveBeFoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beach F, Gribble D, Littlefair M, Rounsley R, Testrow I, Wiggin M (2004). BlastLite-the practical low-density solution. In Proceedings explo. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 147–152Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berta G (1990) Explosives: an engineering tool, Italesplosivi-MilanoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brady BH, Brown ET (2013) Rock mechanics: for underground mining. Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 518–542Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinkman JR (1990) An experimental study on the effects of shock and gas penetration in blasting, Proceedings 3rd international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting, Brisbane, 26-321, p. 335–343Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruckman HJ Jr, Guillet JE (1968) Theoretical calculations of hot-spot initiation in explosives. Can J Chem 46(20):3221–3228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiappetta RF (1998) Blast monitoring instrumentation and analysis techniques, with an emphasis on field applications. Fragblast 2(1):79-122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper PW, Kurowski SR (1996) Introduction to the technology of explosives. Wiley-VCH, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crosby WA, Bauer AW, Warkentin JPF (1996) State of art explosive VOD measurement system, Proc. 7th annual conference on explosive and blasting, International Society of Explosive Engineers, pp. 23–34Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cunningham C (2005) Defining non-ideal performance for commercial explosives. Proc. 36th conference & exhibition, Institute of South Africa & ASPA, 3–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng C, Ze-gong L (2014) Energy distribution of columnar explosive blasting in rock. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:4221–4423Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagan TN (1979) Rock breakage by explosives. Acta Astronautica 6(3–4):329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harsh HK, Dwivedi RD, Swarup A, Prasad VVR (2005) Velocity of detonation (VOD) - a review of measurement techniques. In: Proc. conference on technological advancement and environmental challenges in mining and allied industries in the 21st century. NIT Rourkela, India, pp 169–175Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heit A (2011) An investigation into the parameters that affect the swell factor used in volume and design calculations at Callide open cut coal mine. PhD Thesis. University of Southern QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunter C, Fedak K, Todoeschuck JP (1993) Development of low density explosives with wall control applications. In Proceedings ISEE annual conference 1993, pp. 549–554Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jackson M (1993) Low strength water gel explosive. In Proceedings of the annual conference on explosives and blasting technique, International Society of Explosives Engineers. pp. 493–493Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson RJ (1996) ‘SANFO’ ‘the missing link’ in explosives technology. In Proceedings ISEE annual conference, pp. 242–252Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kabwe E (2016) Improving collar zone fragmentation by top air-deck blasting technique. Geotech Geol Eng 35(1):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kabwe E, Banda W (2018) Stemming zone fragmentation analysis of optimized blasting with top-column air decks. CIM J 9(1)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kabwe E (2018) Velocity of detonation measurement and fragmentation analysis to evaluate blasting efficacy. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10(3):523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maranda A, Drobysz B, Paszula J (2014) Research on detonation parameters of low density emulsion explosives modified by microballoons. CHEMIK 68(1):17–22Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mertuszka P, Kramarczyk B (2018) The impact of time on the detonation capacity of bulk emulsion explosives based on Emulinit 8L. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 43(8):799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mishra A, Rout M, Singh DR, Jana S (2017) Influence of density of emulsion explosives on its velocity of detonation and fragmentation of blasted muckpile. Curr Sci 00113891 112(3)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mishra AK, Sinha PR (2003) VOD measurement techniques-a review. In Proceedings of the 15th national seminar on explosive and blasting, Dhandad, pp 43–52Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mishra AK, Manamohan M, Deepanshu R, Singh R (2018) Influence of gassing agent and density on detonation velocity of bulk emulsion explosives. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Persson PA, Holmberg R, Lee J (1993) Rock blasting and explosives engineering. CRC press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pradhan GK, Pradhan M (2013) Explosive energy distribution in an explosive column through use of non-explosive material-case studies. In blasting in mining-new trends. CRC Press, pp. 97-106Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pradhan M (2007) Investigation into the effect of some factors on detonation velocity of chemically sensitized bulk emulsion explosive (Doctoral thesis), NIT Raipur, RaipurGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pradhan M, Balakrishnan V, Pradhan GK (2015) Use of discarded water bottles in blasting: an innovative enviro-friendly technique. Int J Chem Environ Biol Sci 3(I):51–53Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raman Sundar DB, Satpathy RR, Satyanaryanan GV, Pradhan GK, Pradhan M (2013) Explosive energy distribution through placement of low explosive air gap –case study of an Indian Iron ore mine, 7th world conference on explosives & blasting, Moscow, 15–17, p. 22–29Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rowe JL, Goodridge R, Stow D, Molloy KJ (2002) Variable energy explosives for soft ground blasting. Fragblast 6(2):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spathis AT (2013) Innovations in blast measurement: reinventing the past. In rock fragmentation by blasting: the 10th international symposium onrock fragmentation by blasting, 2012. Fragblast 10 Taylor & Francis Books Ltd pp 23-39Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Suceska M (1995) Test methods for explosives. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tete AD, Deshmukh AY, Yerpude RR (2013) Velocity of detonation (VOD) measurement techniques practical approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 2(3):259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilson JM, Moxon NT (1989) The development of a low shock energy ammonium nitrate-based explosive. In Proceedings ISEE annual conference, pp. 297–308Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil, Environmental and Mining EngineeringThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations