Advertisement

Estimation of the Fluid Velocity Profile in the Stratification Zone of a Falcon Concentrator

  • Ranjeet Kumar SinghEmail author
  • Raj Kishore
  • Kisor Kumar Sahu
  • Ganesh Chalavadi
  • Ratnakar Singh
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The Falcon concentrator is capable of separating minerals in fine size classes based on their differential density. Separation of mineral particles depends upon the fluid flow characteristics and relative movement of particles in a fluid. In the present study, a fluid flow characteristic inside the Falcon concentrator was established through experimentation and modeling. The Falcon concentrator has two fluid entry points: (a) Fluid entering through gravity assisted feeding system and (b) Fluid entering through the fluidized hole on the concentrator wall. In order to identify the role of fluid entering the concentrator, a tracer was injected into the system. As per the tracer based experimentation, it was established that fluid entering through the gravity based feeding system is responsible for thin flowing film formation in the stratification zone where particles are stratified based on their relative density. The momentum balance and continuity equations were simplified for a high centrifugal force field, and the fluid velocity profile was estimated inside the thin flowing film. Estimated fluid flow profiles will help to simulate the particle trajectories inside the Falcon concentrator. The influence of rotational speed, fluid flow rate, and cone angle on the fluid velocity profile were investigated. Fluid thickness over the concentrator wall is also estimated, and it is typically of the order of ~150–200 μm.

Keywords

Falcon concentrator Fluid velocity profile Rotational speed Fluidized water Cone angle and fluid thickness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help and cooperation of the staff of the Mineral Processing Division at CSIR-NML Jamshedpur, India towards the research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Traore A, Conil P, Houot R, Save M (1995) An evaluation of the Mozley MGS for fine particle gravity separator. Miner Eng 8(7):767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McAlister S (1992) Case studies in the use of the Falcon gravity concentrator. 24th Annual Canadian Mineral Processor Conference, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lins FF, Veiga MM, Stewart JA, Papalia A, Papalia R (1992) Performance of a new centrifuge (Falcon) in concentrating a gold from Texada Island, B.C., Canada. Min Eng 5(10–12):1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Q, Cui Z, Etsell TH (2006) Pre-concentration and residual bitumen removal from Athabasca oilsands froth treatment tailings by a Falcon centrifugal concentrator. Int J Miner Process 78:220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farag MZ, Abdel-Khalek NA, Hassan MS, El Aref MM, Manawi AWE (2012) Upgrading of Egyptian nonsulfide zinc ore by gravity separation techniques. J Metal Eng 1(1):6–13Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oruç F, Özgen S, Sabah E (2010) An enhanced-gravity method to recover ultra-fine coal from tailings: Falcon concentrator. Fuel 89:2433–2437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boylu F (2013) Modeling of free and hindered settling conditions for fine coal beneficiation through a Falcon Concentrator. Int J Coal Prep Util 33:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang B, Yang F, Akbari H, Mohanty MK, Brodzik P, Latta P, Hirschi JC (2011) Evaluation of a new fine coal cleaning circuit consisting of a stack sizer and a Falcon Enhanced Gravity Concentrator. Int J Coal Prep Util 31:78–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibrahim SS, El Anadoly BE, Farahat MM, Selim AQ, El-Menshawy AH (2014) Separation of pyritic sulfur from egyptian coal using Falcon concentrator. Part Sci Technol 32:588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tao Y-J, Luo Z-F, Zhao Y-M, Tao D (2006) Experimental research on desulfurization of fine coal using an enhanced centrifugal gravity separator. J China Univ Min Technol 16(4):399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Honaker RQ, Wang D, Ho K (1996) Application of the Falcon concentrator for fine coal cleaning. Miner Eng 9(11):1143–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honaker RQ, Singh N, Govindarajan B (2000) Application of dense-medium in an enhanced gravity separator for fine coal cleaning. Miner Eng 13(4):415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laplante AR, Buonvino M, Veltmeyer A, Robitaille J, Naud G (1994) A study of the Falcon concentrator. Can Metall Q 33(4):279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Honaker RQ, Paul BC, Wang D, Huang M (1995) Application of centrifugal washing for fine coal cleaning. Miner Metall Process 12(2):80–84Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh RK, Sahu KK, Chalavadi G, Singh R, Padmanabhan NPH Separation characteristics of centrifugal fluidized separator using binary density system. Min Proc Ext Met (TIMM).  https://doi.org/10.1080/25726641.2019.1602394
  16. 16.
    Kroll-Rabotin J-S, Bourgeois F, Climent E (2010) Fluid dynamics based modelling of the Falcon concentrator for ultrafine particle beneficiation. Min Eng 23:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kroll-Rabotin J-S, Bourgeois F, Climent E (2013) Physical analysis and modeling of the Falcon concentrator for beneficiation of ultrafine particles. Int J Miner Process 121:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu X-N, Tao Y-J, Zhang L (2018) Numerical simulation of flow field in enhanced gravity concentrator. Phys Prob Min Proc.  https://doi.org/10.5277/ppmp1899
  19. 19.
    Hinze JO, Milborn H (1950) Atomization of liquids by means of a rotating cup. J Appl Mech 17(2):145–153Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruin S (1969) Veocity distribution in liquid film flowing over rotating conical surface. Chem Eng Sci 24:1647–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagenaar BM, Prins W, Van Swaaij WPM (1994) Pyrolysis of biomass in the rotating cone reactor: modelling and experimental justification. Chem Eng Sci 49(24B):5109–5126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wagenaar BM, Kuipers JAM, Van Swaaij WPM (1994) Particles dynamics and gas-phase hydrodynamics in a rotating cone reactor. Chem Eng Sci 49(7):927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Janse AMC, Dijk PE, Kuipers JAM (2000) The volume of fluid methods in spherical coordinates. Int J Numer Method Heat Fluid Flow 10(7):654–674CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dijk PE, Janse AMC, Kuipers JAM, Van Swaaij WPM (2001) Hydrodynamics of liquid flow in rotating cone. Int J Numer Method Heat Fluid Flow 11(5):386–412CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Makarytchev SV, Xue E, Langrish TAG, Prince RGH (1997) On modelling fluid flow over a rotating conical surface. Chem Eng Sci 52(6):1055–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mineral Processing DivisionCSIR-National Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia
  2. 2.School of Minerals, Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, IIT BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations