Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:1213 | Cite as

Optical properties of 2D photonic structures fabricated by direct laser writing

  • Artem Sinelnik
  • Kirill Samusev
  • Mikhail Rybin
  • Mikhail LimonovEmail author
Short Communication
  • 84 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Physics: Smart Photonic and Optoelectronic Materials

Abstract

This paper presents the results of fabrication and investigation of different 2D photonic structures with the square C4v, hexagonal C6v, and pentagonal local C5v symmetry. The samples were created using the direct laser writing technique. The number of submicron scatterers varied from 25 to 10,000, and the lattice parameters varied in different samples in the range of 0.5 μm ≤ a ≤ 8.0 μm. Our experimental and theoretical studies demonstrate that 2D photonic structures reveal many remarkable optical effects. Created ordered and disordered photonic structures demonstrate a great variety of optical phenomena observed on a far-field screen placed behind the sample. When the random fluctuations of the orientation for individual rods were introduced to the perfect fishnet photonic structure, a crossover from Laue diffraction to speckle patterns was observed and investigated.

Keywords

Light scattering Laue diffraction SEM images Photonic structure Metasurface Direct laser writing 

1 Introduction

During the interaction of light with photonic structures, diffraction, refraction, reflection, and absorption result in light scattering patterns. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive description of optical diffraction spectra of 2D dielectric photonic structures possessing low dielectric contrast. Using the direct laser writing technique [1, 2, 3], we fabricate a variety of 2D photonic microstructures with different symmetry, lattice constant, number of elements, and degree of disorder. Unambiguous interpretation of the effects observed in optical spectra can be obtained only on the basis of extended structural information using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To evaluate the complex response function of 2D photonic structures, we check several models and compare theoretical and experimental results.

In our previous works [4, 5], we studied a fine structure of the diffraction patterns that is clearly observed for samples with rather a small number of scatterers of 2D structures with the orthogonal C2v, square C4v, and hexagonal C6v symmetry. We demonstrated that one can define the number of scatterers N directly from the experimental optical diffraction patterns. For conventional 2D photonic films with a large number of scatterers, all maxima merge into spectrum and cannot be resolved in the averaged profile of the diffraction patterns. The transformation of diffraction patterns from a 2D single layer toward a bulk 3D structure was demonstrated by the example of optical studies of synthetic opals a-SiO2 [6].

Here, we study experimentally optical diffraction from fabricated ordered and disordered 2D woodpile structures as well as from the Penrose tilings. When the random fluctuations of the orientation for individual rods were introduced to the ideal woodpile photonic structure, a crossover from Laue diffraction to speckle patterns was observed and investigated experimentally and numerically. Laser speckle [7] is an interference pattern produced by light scattered from different parts of the disordered structure. The scattering intensity at any point on the screen is determined by the algebraic addition of all the wave amplitudes at this point.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Samples preparation and characterization

In this study, to fabricate different 2D photonic microstructures, we employ the two-photon polymerization method, which is also called direct laser writing (DLW) [1, 2, 3]. The method is based on the nonlinear two-photon polymerization of a photosensitive material (negative or positive) in the focus of a laser beam. A high resolution of the DLW method is due to the intensity-threshold character of the polymerization process which occurs in a region with sizes significantly smaller than the size of the focused beam. This technique makes it possible to form a 3D photonic crystal with a transverse resolution below 100 nm.

To realize the direct laser writing technique, we use the installation and software from Laser Zentrum Hannover (Germany). The structures were fabricated using a hybrid organic–inorganic material based on zirconium propoxide with an Irgacure 369 photo-initiator (Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc., Basel, Switzerland). The advantage of this material is low shrinkage upon polymerization, which guarantees a perfect correspondence of the resulting structure to a suggested mathematical model. The polymerization was performed with a train of femtosecond pulses (wavelength was 780 nm) at a repetition frequency of 80 MHz (12.5 ns between consecutive pulses) from a 50 fs TiF-100F laser (Avesta-Project, Russia). Laser radiation was focused in the photoresist volume through the glass substrate with a 100× oil-immersion microscope objective with numerical aperture NA = 1.4. The structures were fabricated by means of raster scanning in a layer-by-layer format. The scanning path of the laser focus is moved along a 2D scanning path in the xy-plane, while translation of the beam spot in the z-axis enables processing of 3D photonic structures.

The structures of fabricated samples are shown in Fig. 1. As an example, we describe in more detail the structure of the ordered and disordered fishnet 2D crystals. A woodpile structure [8] consisting of only two layers is called a fishnet structure. With the square dielectric rod as building block, two types of fishnet structures were created: a perfectly ordered arrangement structure (Fig. 1b) and a random arrangement of rods for glassy metasurfaces (two xy-layers) Fig. 1c. We fabricated the disordered fishnet structures as follows. Each individual rod in the xy-layer was rotated around its center (along the x- or y-axis) by random angle \(\alpha_{i}\) with respect to the ordered structure. We used two different kinds of random fluctuations, namely distribution functions: \(\sigma = p\frac{\pi }{4},\;0 \le p \le 1\) is the dispersion of \(\alpha\) and uniform distribution \(- \alpha_{{\rm max} } \le \alpha_{i} \le \alpha_{{\rm max} }\) with \(\alpha_{{\rm max} } = p\frac{\pi }{4},\;0 \le p \le 1\). All structures have external size of 50 × 50 μm in the xy-plane.
Fig. 1

SEM images of different 2D photonic structures fabricated by the two-photon polymerization method. a Direct square structure (10 × 10) voxels, a1 = a2 = 1 μm, b fishnet, c disordered woodpile, d honeycomb, e triangular, and f Penrose tiling photonic structures

We fabricate dielectric photonic structures as 2D arrays of scatterers with the square C4v, orthogonal C2v, hexagonal C6v lattice symmetry, and the Penrose tiling pentagonal local C5v symmetry. The number of scatterers varied from 25 to 10,000. The lattice parameters varied in different samples in the range of 0.5 μm ≤ a ≤ 8.0 μm. The correspondence of the resulting materials to the designed structures was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique.

2.2 Optical setup

A photograph of the experimental setup for optical diffraction measurements is shown in Fig. 2a. A glass substrate ~ 1 cm2 in area with a set of microsamples was mounted in a precision holder used in X-ray diffraction studies. The samples were illuminated by a Nd laser with wavelength of λ = 0.53 μm. The laser beam was focused by a lens (25 cm focal length) onto microsamples at normal incidence. The optical system provided a full exposure of the sample (the laser spot at the samples surface was about 150 μm in diameter), so that all the particles scattered light with the same intensity. The diffraction patterns were examined visually and photographed on a flat semitransparent screen placed behind the sample in a far-field region. The distance from the sample to the screen was about 20 cm.
Fig. 2

a Experimental optical setup and pattern for zero-, first- and second-order Laue diffraction of monochromatic light (\(\lambda = 0.53\;\upmu{\text{m}}\)) from a triangular 2D structure were observed on a flat screen positioned behind the sample. b Schematic of the zero- and first-order Laue diffraction from the triangular structure is presented in Fig. 1e. Diffraction patterns (arcs and strips) on a flat screen are shown by thick lines. Scattered light is shown by different colors for clarity

3 Laue diffraction from 2D photonic structures

3.1 Laue diffraction: theoretical background

For the analysis of Laue diffraction patterns from low-contrast 2D photonic structures, we use the Born approximation. In Born approximation, the diffraction intensity is determined by a product of the squares of the structure factor S(q), the scattering form factor F(q), and a polarization factor [9]. In our low-contrast case, it is sufficient to consider only the structure factor S(q). For the 2D square structure, the position of each scatterer is determined by the 2D vector \({\mathbf{r}}_{i} = {\mathbf{a}}_{1} n_{1} + {\mathbf{a}}_{2} n_{2}\), \(0 \le n_{j} \le N_{j}\) and \(N_{j}\) are integer. The diffraction angles and peak intensities become simple functions of the crystallographic 2D structure [10]:
$$S({\mathbf{q}}) = \frac{{\sin (N_{1} {\mathbf{qa}}_{1} /2)}}{{\sin ({\mathbf{qa}}_{1} /2)}}\frac{{\sin (N_{2} {\mathbf{qa}}_{2} /2)}}{{\sin ({\mathbf{qa}}_{2} /2)}}\exp \left( {i\frac{{(N_{1} - 1){\mathbf{qa}}_{1} + (N_{2} - 1){\mathbf{qa}}_{2} }}{2}} \right).$$
(1)

Here, \({\mathbf{q}} \equiv {\mathbf{k}}_{i} - {\mathbf{k}}_{s}\) is the scattering vector, whereas \({\mathbf{k}}_{i}\) and \({\mathbf{k}}_{s}\) are the wave vectors of the incident and scattered waves.

To analyze the diffraction patterns, we consider the scattering from one-dimensional linear chain of scatterers first. The condition for the appearance of the Laue diffraction maxima for the linear chain and normal incidence is described by the simple formula:
$$\theta_{s} = \cos^{ - 1} \left( {n\lambda /a} \right)$$
(2)
where \(a = \left| {{\mathbf{a}}_{ 1} } \right|\), λ is the wavelength of incident light, θs is the angle of scattering on the chain between vectors a1 and the wave vector of the scattered waves \({\mathbf{k}}_{s}\). Equation (2) defines the diffraction selection rules in relation to the ratio between λ and a because the inverse cosine function is defined in the interval from −1 to 1 only. For zero-order diffraction (n = 0), the angle of light scattering becomes \(\theta_{s} = 90^{ \circ }\) and the scattering is observed for any ratio between λ and a in the plane perpendicular to the axis \({\mathbf{a}}\). Next, a pair of diffraction cones of the n-th order appears at \(a > n\lambda\). For \(\lambda \, < \alpha < 2\lambda\), we can distinguish in the diffraction patterns additionally to the plane (n = 0) a pair of cones (n = 1) that has the axes of symmetry coinciding with \({\mathbf{a}}\) and the apex angle of scattering \(\theta_{s1} = \cos^{ - 1} \left( {\lambda /a} \right)\) (Fig. 2b). For \(2\lambda \, < \alpha < 3\lambda\), we can observe the plane and two pairs of cones with \(\theta_{s1} = \cos^{ - 1} \left( {\lambda /a} \right)\) (n = 1) and \(\theta_{s2} = \cos^{ - 1} \left( {2\lambda /a} \right)\) (n = 2) (Fig. 2a) and so on.

We observed experimentally strong optical diffraction from rather small (50 × 50 μm) low-contrast dielectric 2D samples on a flat screen placed behind the sample (Fig. 2a). The ordered fishnet structure (Fig. 1b) can be considered as a structure composed of two sets of mutually orthogonal chains of scatterers along the x- and y-axes.

For all ordered fishnets with the square symmetry C4v, the experimentally measured diffraction patterns demonstrate the same C4v symmetry (Fig. 3). In Fig. 3a, for all samples, we can distinguish on the screen two types of the diffraction features: Two orthogonal strips that correspond to the zero-order scattering (n = 0) and two pairs of arcs that correspond to the first-order of scattering (n = ± 1). The patterns are formed by intersections of planes or cones with flat screen, as shown schematically in Fig. 2b. For the chain of scatterers with the lattice constant of \(a_{ 1} = 1\;\upmu{\text{m}}\) and \(\lambda = 0.53\;\upmu{\text{m}}\), the first-order cones have angle of scattering \(\theta_{s1} = 58^\circ\).
Fig. 3

Diffraction pattern evolution from ordered a to disordered b–f woodpile thin slabs with normal distribution of the disordered parameter p. a \(p\) = 0, b \(p\) = 0.02, c \(p\) = 0.04, d \(p\) = 0.06, e \(p\) = 0.1, f \(p\) = 0.5. The lattice parameters of the ordered sample \(a_{x} = a_{y} = 1\;\upmu{\text{m}}\), the number of layers along the z-axis N = 8 for all samples. The patterns are observed on a flat screen positioned behind the sample. \(\lambda = 0.53\;\upmu{\text{m}}\)

3.2 Transformation from Laue diffraction to speckle patterns

Figure 3 presents the results of experimental studies of light scattering from ordered and disordered woodpile thin slabs depending on the disorder parameter p, together with the SEM images of the corresponding structures. When the random fluctuations of the orientation for both x-oriented and y-oriented individual rods are introduced, the diffraction patterns changed dramatically: Stripes and arcs become randomized and a granular distribution of light intensity appears through the entire screen (Fig. 3b–f). For disordered structure, light from different points of the sample traverses different optical path lengths to reach the screen. As a result, a laser speckle appears on the screen which is a random interference effect that gives a high-contrast granular distribution of scattering intensity. The speckle diffraction pattern is one of the most remarkable properties of photonic glasses [11], the disordered woodpile we be classified as a new type of such photonic structures.

Figure 4 presents results of the diffraction study on anisotropic glassy woodpiles. The anisotropic structure is designed with disorder in rods which initially oriented along x-axis while all rods oriented along y-axis are ordered. From Fig. 4e, it is clearly seen that the arcs from ordered set of rods (a rod marked with the red rectangle in Fig. 4d) becomes randomized and hardly observed while the cones from disordered set of rods (a rod marked with the yellow rectangle in Fig. 4d) remained strong and bright. To explain this result, we have carried out the calculations of the diffraction patterns using two different models of scatterers. For the first model, we consider each dielectric rod as a set of 1000 coaxial equidistant point scatterers (“rod model”). Such model (Fig. 4i) fails to describe the experimental patterns in Fig. 4e. For the second model, we assume that only points of rods intersections define the diffraction patterns (“points of intersections model”). The results of calculations using the “points of intersections” model are in excellent agreement with experimental data. The reason is that all points of intersections owned by each x-oriented rod are distributed equidistantly (blue points in Fig. 4c) due to equidistant arrangement of the y-oriented ordered set of rods. Therefore, each x-oriented rod gives rise to perfect (yellow) arcs. In contrast, because of the disorder in the x-oriented set of rods, all interscatterer distances in y-direction become randomized resulting in the destruction of the perfect (red) arcs.
Fig. 4

SEM images of the square ordered a and x-disordered d woodpile-type photonic structures. b, e Experimentally measured diffraction patterns corresponding to the upper structures. c, f Diffraction patterns numerically calculated using the “points of intersections model”. g, h Schematic of the zero-order (n = 0) and first-order (n = ± 1) Laue diffraction from the horizontally (g) and vertically (h) oriented chains of scatterers. Yellow color corresponds to scattering from horizontal (disordered) rods, and red color corresponds to scattering from vertical (ordered) rods. i Diffraction patterns numerically calculated using the “rod model”

3.3 The Penrose tiling

The Penrose tilings were described for the first time in a paper with a title “The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research” [12] that emphasizes the extraordinary structure of these 2D quasicrystalline lattices [13, 14]. We note that the concept of quasicrystal as a nonperiodic structure with perfect long-ranged order was brought in solid-state physics in 1984 [15], 10 years after Roger Penrose’s publication [12]. The Penrose tiling can be thought of as a generalization of the Fibonacci lattice to the 2D case [16].

We have fabricated a set of the Penrose photonic quasicrystals using the direct laser writing technique. A Penrose quasicrystal structure can be built according to the additive rules as shown in Fig. 5. Two types of rhombuses having sides of the same length but different angles at the vertices constitute a Penrose tiling. Large rhombuses with αbig1 = 72° and αbig2 = 108° angles form a central star, and small rhombuses with αsm1 = 36° and αsm2 = 144° angles form the next layer of the structure (Fig. 5a), and so on (Fig. 5b–d).
Fig. 5

SEM images of Penrose tiling photonic structures. Colored circles show substitution rules for constructing a 2D Penrose quasicrystal

We also demonstrate two images of Penrose tilings taken with a conventional optical photograph, Fig. 6a, b. Figure 6c, d demonstrate experimentally measured Laue diffraction patterns. As theoretically expected, a fivefold orientational symmetry of the Penrose tiling gives rise to a tenfold orientational symmetry of the diffraction images as demonstrated by the numbering in Fig. 6d.
Fig. 6

Photographs of two Penrose tiling photonic structures a, b and corresponding experimentally measured Laue diffraction patterns c, d \(\lambda = 0.53\;\upmu{\text{m}}\)

4 Conclusions

We demonstrate that optical diffraction experiments offer a variety of information on the mechanisms of light scattering from 2D ordered and disordered dielectric photonic structures. The experiments were carried out on different 2D photonic structures fabricated using direct laser writing technique, and the results were discussed on the basis of the Laue equations in the Born approximation. We visualized the diffraction patterns for 2D photonic structures on a flat screen placed behind the sample. We have demonstrated the mechanism for the formation of optical diffraction patterns from disordered woodpile-type photonic structures. Our calculated results are in good agreement with experiment. We also found the tenfold orientational symmetry of the diffraction patterns of Penrose tilings.

Notes

Funding

Authors acknowledge support by Goszadanie (Grant Nos. 0040-2019-0006). M.V.R. and A.D.S acknowledge support by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (3.1500.2017/4.6).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Farsari M, Chichkov BN (2009) Two-photon fabrication. Nat Photon 3:450–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer J, Wegener M (2013) Three-dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit. Laser Photon Rev 7:22–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sekkat Z, Kawata S (2014) Laser nanofabrication in photoresists and azopolymers. Laser Photon Rev 8:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rybin MV, Samusev KB, Lukashenko SYu, Kivshar YS, Limonov MF (2016) Transition from two-dimensional photonic crystals to dielectric metasurfaces in the optical diffraction with a fine structure. Sci Rep 6:30773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinelnik AD, Rybin MV, Lukashenko SY, Limonov MF, Samusev KB (2017) Optical properties of honeycomb photonic structures. Phys Rev A 95:063837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rybin MV, Sinev IS, Samusev AK, Samusev KB, Trofimova EY, Kurdyukov DA, Golubev VG, Limonov MF (2013) Dimensionality effects on the optical diffraction from opal-based photonic structures. Phys Rev B 87(12):125131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briers JD (2001) Laser Doppler, speckle and related techniques for blood perfusion mapping and imaging. Physiol Meas 22:R35–R66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brüser B, Staude I, von Freymann G, Wegener M, Pietsch U (2012) Visible light Laue diffraction from woodpile photonic crystals. Appl Opt 51:6732–6737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ziman JM (1979) Models of disorder: the theoretical physics of homogeneously disordered systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guinier A (1994) X-ray diffraction in crystals, imperfect crystals, and amorphous bodies. Courier CorporationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia PD, Sapienza R, Blanco A, López C (2007) Photonic glass: a novel random material for light. Adv Mater 19:2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Penrose R (1974) The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research. Bull Inst Math Appl 10:266Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shir D, Liao H, Jeon S, Xiao D, Johnson HT, Bogart GR, Bogart KHA, Rogers JA (2008) Three-dimensional nanostructures formed by single step, two-photon exposures through elastomeric Penrose quasicrystal phase masks. Nano Lett 8:2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaliteevski MA, Brand S, Abram RA, Krauss TF, Millar P, De La Rue RM (2001) Diffraction and transmission of light in low-refractive index Penrose-tiled photonic quasicrystals. J Phys Condens Matter 13:10459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levine D, Steinhardt PJ (1984) Quasicrystals: a new class of ordered structures. Phys Rev Lett 53:2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poddubny AN, Ivchenko EL (2012) Quasicrystalline photonic structures: between order and disorder. In: Limonov MF, Rue RDL (eds) Optical properties of photonic structures: interplay of order and disorder. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artem Sinelnik
    • 1
  • Kirill Samusev
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mikhail Rybin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mikhail Limonov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Ioffe InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations