Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:1179 | Cite as

Comparative study of bio-materials versus conventional materials in building construction methods; economical evaluation of different building materials

  • Abdelaziz F. MohamedEmail author
  • Mai Mokhtar
  • Shaimaa Elghobashy
Research Article
  • 193 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Materials Science: Sustainable Building Materials, the Netherlands, 2019

Abstract

The problem of desertification has become a threat for many regions in Egypt as a result of climate change and the improper use of natural resources which has had a negative impact on human life and food shortages, leading to an increase in the migration rate. Many proposals have been presented to solve the problem of desertification but have not succeeded. Therefore, it was necessary to refer to nature and find solutions from it. Nature has been always a source of inspiration for human being in different aspects of their life, also it has been a part of human architecture since the early architectural periods in the caves that he used to live in and using materials from the surrounding nature, but this is not only what architecture took from nature it also influenced the form, function, space and structure. The aim of this research is to understand the role that nature plays in architecture to achieve buildings integrated with the surrounding environment with economical cost. It makes architects pay attention to nature as a source of inspiration in different perspectives. The case study of this paper presents the application of bio-material as a building and construction material and compares it with traditional building materials through the present worth method including the initial cost, characteristics and life time period to apply bio-material on a selected case study.

Keywords

Desertification Bio-materials Feasibility study Life cycle costing 

1 Introduction

Each year the desert progresses 600 m [1], at a rate of 2 m per day, and in the Sahara alone arises Daily a billion new sand grains, needing new spaces and forcing people to migrate and more Poverty. The problem is very acute and it is standing in front of millions of people living on the borders of the desert in Africa (as shown in Fig. 1). One third of the land suffers from drought and 60% of the Earth's population is affected.
Fig. 1

The coverage of sand for five deserts in Africa.

Source: sites.google.com

In 2003, twenty-three African States met to develop plans to combat desertification. The original plan was based on planting a million trees as a wall along the line of desertification that passes along the African continent. Certainly it was an initiative worthy of appreciation, but it faced many Practical difficulties not least that poor people were cutting trees to sell fuel [1].

As a result, most of the sciences start to look back to nature and inspire from it and many research and studies are done through this, the idea started from 1998 by Janine Benyus. Nowadays many researchers are working on it because they feel that nature is a great source to inspire from it. Jirapong believes that nature has many great lessons for human to study and learn from it. The creativity use of material, resourcefulness structural systems act in response to dissimilar kind of climatic and environmental forces. Tomasz and Rafal in their Structural design inspired by nature are saying “Complicated design problems needs novel solution to solve and as most of the solution already done in nature” [2].

2 Relationship between human and nature

From the beginning of creation, human was surrounded by nature and influenced by it in its different design elements such as: form, function, space and structure. Everything in nature is well organized and in harmony [2]. It has been a source of inspiration for human in different aspects of their life and it can be a reflection of a person's beliefs and desires. Human is a part of the surrounding nature and the surrounding environment has an impact on human behaviors and attitude [3], the effect of the environment on behavior is direct, passive, simple and readily predictable [4, 5]. The effects of the environment on human behavior are through responses of an emotional nature [6]. In fact human resort to nature for relaxation, refreshment and calmness due to the impact of its colors on human and giving the sense of inner happiness [7].

Nature is an emotional element within the surrounding environment and is an important aspect to deal with everyday affecting everything around human. Human always communicates with nature; since starting to build shelters and using them, nature has been used as an important and basic part in the plans and designs. Human being noticed the advantages of communicating with nature as; health, less stress and sickness. Plants and green spaces can help in perfection and safety in the cities and improvement of social relationship and interaction in residential environments [8].

By time passing and in the presence of technology development respect to nature decreased and human became over nature, replacing technology as a metaphor instead of nature as a metaphor results in a major difference in the relationship between human, architecture and nature. Most of nowadays designs and its application harm the natural environmental system that supports human lives on planet and convert the green planet into a concrete one as human architecture is the largest consumer for natural resources (as shown in Fig. 2), which result in lack of buildings integrated with the surrounding environment and neglecting natural elements during the design process, lack of natural interior spaces although it helps in solving environmental problems facing earth by minimizing the energy usage, water and raw materials. Therefore, one of the design solutions for architects and designers to increase the optimization in their design works is looking at nature in every aspect deeper and try to apply it on the conceptual design [4].
Fig. 2

Nowadays built environment and the energy it consumes (Researcher)

3 Importance of designing with nature

It creates new architecture integrated with the environment to achieve human needs and satisfaction. New natural ideas are capable of creating new understanding and therefore, new realities. It approaches building forms to the elements in nature to be familiar for human being. It is an important and effective tool for creativity and it gives the ability for designers to express their own ideas and find several design solutions [3] (as shown in Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Designing form nature is the source of creativity (Researcher)

4 Construction from nature in desert environment

Bacillus pasteurii is a friendly type of bacteria that has been used lately as a construction method in different projects to save the land from desertification [5] (as shown in Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Proposed projects saving land from desertification (Researcher)

4.1 Sand dune project by Magnus Larsson

The architect Magnus Larsson began to think in a way to solve the problem of desertification with architecture. The idea was to move buildings next to the trees, and then people could live under the shadow of the trees, at the same time the need to stabilize the sand movement. The idea was to use materials available in the area; the sand itself without the need for transport or purchase (as shown in Fig. 5) [9, 10].
Fig. 5

The Dune project design.

Source: bldgblog.com

Through the sand-stuffing can build a wall along 6000 km to be a green belt. The problem faced the idea was how to convert sand into stones? After a period of research and testing Magnus arrived That bacteria Bacillus pasteurii can do the job at the cheapest prices and most efficient and a long life time which is more than 100 years (as shown in Figs. 6, 7) [9, 10].
Fig. 6

Testing the Bacillus pasteurii bacteria.

Source: bldgblog.com

Fig. 7

The benefits for the solidified sand structure.

Source: bldgblog.com

A particular microorganism, Bacillus pasteurii, is flushed through the dun-escape, which causes a biological reaction that turns the sand into solid sandstone. The initial reactions finish within 24 h; it would take about a week to saturate the sand enough to make the structure habitable. The bacteria are non-pathogenic and die in the process of solidifying the sand, also the wind could change the form by solidifying parts of the surface to force the grains of sand to align in certain patterns, certain shapes, having the wind blow out our voids, creating a structure that would change and change again over the course of a decade, a century, a millennium (as shown in Fig. 8) [11, 12].
Fig. 8

Steps for obtaining Bacillus pasteurii structure.

Source: bldgblog.com and Authors

Construction methods
  • A balloon-like pneumatic structure filled with Bacillus pasteurii, which would then be released into the sand and allowed to solidify the same into permaculture architecture (as shown in Fig. 9) [9].
    Fig. 9

    Structure created by balloon.

    Source: bldgblog.com

  • The piles would be pushed through the dune surface and a first layer of bacteria spread out, solidifying an initial surface within the dune. They would then be pulled up, creating almost any conceivable (structurally sound) surface along their way, with the loose sand acting as a jig before being excavated to create the necessary voids (as shown in Fig. 10) [9].
    Fig. 10

    Structure created by sand injection.

    Source: bldgblog.com

The architectural form is derived from tafoni, a cavernous rock structure that formally ties the project back to notions of aggregation and erosion (as shown in Fig. 11). These forms are porous and have a large surface area which will help in inner ventilation and relaxing temperature, for bacteria in the soil, you can get infinity of artistic formations that match the surrounding environment [11, 12].
Fig. 11

The concept of architectural form of Bacillus pasteurii structure.

Source: bldgblog.com

The temperature difference between the interior and the exterior of the solidified dunes makes it possible to create nodal points that could both support water harvesting and inhabitable thermal comfort zones. This gives the chance for growing oases in the desert, and stops the sand from pushing people away from their homes and villages (as shown in Fig. 12) [11, 12].
Fig. 12

Phases of form transformation of the sand dune project.

Source: bldgblog.com

The design mainly depends on curves and organic lines which add beauty to the design and it respects the human scale and proportion within the interior space (as shown in Fig. 13) [11, 12].
Fig. 13

Curvy interiors respecting human scale and proportion.

Source: bldgblog.com

Researchers at the University of California at Davis have been investigating the technique which involves injecting the bacterium Bacillus pasteurii into the soil in a calcium-rich, alkaline mix as a means to stabilize the ground in earthquake-prone regions. In the lab, it can solidify 32 square feet of soil in a matter of hours, although they estimate that it would take up to a few weeks for large-scale solidification [13].

4.2 Synthetic sandstone bricks

Professor Ginger Dosier invented a way of constructed sand bricks with the help of bacteria; the bacteria that munch on natural crude oil in ocean water or in sand; take the wondrous critter, Bacillus pasteurii that can turn sand into sandstone and heal cracks in concrete. The architect chose the bricks as they are so humble and are the lowest common denominator in architecture. The sand brick differs than the standard brick which result in more atmospheric pollution and consumes large amounts of energy, as it must be fired in a kiln at temperatures greater than 1000 degrees centigrade; making a couple of bricks generates more than a kilogram of carbon dioxide and it’s estimated that perhaps 1.2 trillion bricks are manufactured around the world every year. The bacteria treated the bricks easily as it produces calcite that can glue sand grains together, treating the bacteria right requires feeding them which is where the urine comes in, can be made synthetically or from urine, and provides nutrition for the bacteria. Water is also necessary, as is calcium chloride (as shown in Fig. 14) [14].
Fig. 14

The components of sand bricks.

Source: throughthesandglass.typepad.com

The process for making a brick is relatively straightforward: by putting dry sand into a mold, adding the cultured bacteria, water, urea, and calcium chloride, and the process takes about a week under 37 degrees centigrade at which the bacteria must be prepared and no heating is required. The brick is about 3 cm long, 1.5 cm wide and a centimeter deep (as shown in Fig. 15) [14].
Fig. 15

Stages for creating sand bricks.

Source: throughthesandglass.typepad.com

4.3 Bacillus pasteurii material cost

The initial price for the purchase of bacteria is $60, which is the price that won't be paid again, the cubic meter of bacterial dirt costs about $11, which is considered a low cost compared to reinforced concrete that costs about 90$ [12].

5 Case study

This research hypothesizes that forms and materials inspired from nature are the most feasible for different architectural projects. The selected site is a residential project in Borg el-Arab District in Alexandria (as shown in Fig. 16). The site is located in the desert of King Maryout and the main view is the Maryout Lake with dimensions 22 m * 30 m. The local materials are white stones and sand. A natural structure will be tested using bacteria material using 3D max for the structure and simulation for sunlight in the desert environment of Alexandria, Egypt (as shown in Fig. 17).
Fig. 16

Selected site analysis.

Source: Authors; googlemaps.com

Fig. 17

3d shot for the structure.

Source: Researcher

The form of the structure is derived from living organisms bone structure as it contributes with different environments due to their existence in all environments. The structure is porous to allow light and ventilation for the interior spaces (as shown in Fig. 18).
Fig. 18

Porous form for the unit.

Source: Researcher

A direct comparison between the organic form and regular form was formed to obtain the amount of light and temperature for each (as shown in Fig. 19).
Fig. 19

Organic form and regular form in desert environment.

Source: Researcher

The temperature differs and the light control in case of organic is better than regular form which proves that organic forms create better living spaces for human being than regular forms (as shown in Fig. 20).
Fig. 20

The amount of ultra violet sunrays is very low in case of bacteria material (less 7 times than regular) and all the spaces are well lit.

Source: Researcher

A direct comparison between construction materials is done in desert environment.

5.1 Bacillus pasteurii bacteria

Cost is a key constraint of the project, a budget for the current project is included in this paper and the Bacillus pasteurii bacteria was chosen to be tested. The initial price of a new residential villa using the Bacillus pasteurii bacteria is estimated at $7260. This cost includes material and labor costs. The material will be compared with two other materials which are reinforced concrete and rammed earth to be applied on the same residential project (as shown in Table 1).
Table 1

Initial cost for the three selected materials.

Source: Authors

Material

Reinforced concrete

Solidified sand

Rammed earth

Components

Reinforced concrete–plain concrete–bricks–finishing

Sand-bacteria

Steel–timber–concrete–precast concrete–brick–earth

Building life time

50 years

More than 100 years

More than 100 years

Area

22 * 30 = 660 m2 (3 floors)

Total initial cost

435,712 $

21,780 $

495,000 $

5.2 Reinforced concrete

Concrete in which steel is embedded in such a manner that the two materials act together in resisting forces. The reinforcing steel rods, bars, or mesh absorbs the tensile, shear, and sometimes the compressive stresses in a concrete structure. Plain concrete does not easily withstand tensile and shear stresses caused by wind, earthquakes, vibrations, and other forces and are therefore unsuitable in most structural applications. In reinforced concrete, the tensile strength of steel and the compressive strength of concrete work together to allow the member to sustain these stresses over considerable spans. The invention of reinforced concrete in the nineteenth century revolutionized the construction industry, and concrete became one of the world’s most common building materials.

Cost: $70 per cubic meter [15].

5.3 Rammed earth

Rammed earth construction is an ancient method originating in Africa, it is best if locally sourced earth is used rather than transported to site, which will lower the walls embodied energy. Forms are made from wood and filled with combination of different earths and a concrete a couple inches at a time and is tamped in layers. The large thermal mass is good for regulating indoor temperature thus reducing heating and cooling bills, and with slight modification this method can be used in any climate.

Cost: $250 per vertical square meter of wall at 30" thick [16].

A direct comparison for the advantages and disadvantages for the three materials is required to help select the best alternative as shown in Table 2:
  • Alternative No. 1 is Reinforced Concrete

  • Alternative No. 2 is Bacillus pasteurii bacteria

  • Alternative No. 3 is Rammed earth

Table 2

Comparison between three alternatives characteristics.

Source: Authors

Type

Advantages

Disadvantages

Reinforced concrete

Traditional method of construction

High cost

Using local materials

Short life time

Not environmentally friendly

No creativity in form

Bacteria

Low cost

Part of the building is underground

Long life time

Bacteria is not a native material (needs to be imported)

Creates any type of form

 

Using native materials

 

Rammed earth

Long life time

High cost

Environmentally friendly

The structure requires lots of materials to construct it

 

No creativity in form

Feasibility study between the three materials is done to select the best economical material for the project as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Comparison between three alternatives cost.

Source: Authors

Item

Alternative 1

Alternative 2

Alternative 3

Original

P.W

Original

P.W

Original

P.W

Initial cost

Initial cost ($)

435,712

435,712

21,780

21,780

495,000

495,000

Design cost

5%

21,780

10%

2178

7%

34,650

License cost

1%

4357

1%

217.8

1%

4950

Initial cost

 

461,854.57

 

24,175.8

 

534,600

Useful life

50 years, I = 10%

100 years, I = 10%

100 years, I = 10%

Replacement

PW of replacement cost

3955

P1 = 1525

2825

P1 = 1089

5650

P1 = 2178

P1 10 years, P/F, I, n

 

P2 = 588

 

P2 = 420

 

P2 = 840

P2 20 years,

 

P3 = 277

 

P3 = 162

 

P3 = 324

P3 30 years,

 

P4 = 87

 

P4 = 62

 

P4 = 125

P4 40 years,

 

P5 = 34

 

P5 = 24

 

P5 = 48

P5 50 years,

   

P6 = 165

 

P6 = 19

P6 60 years,

   

P7 = 9

 

P7 = 7

P7 70 years,

   

P8 = 1.4

 

P8 = 3

P8 80 years,

   

P9 = 0.5

 

P9 = 1

P8 90 years,

   

P10 = 0.3

 

P10 = 0.6

P8 100 years,

      

Total PW replacement cost

 

2460 $

 

1772 $

 

3544 $

Salvage

Salvage cost (20%)

87,142

741 $

4356

0.4 $

99,000

9.9 $

Annual

Pw of maintenance cost (1%)

77,121

43,200 $

2178

21,778 $

4950

49,497 $

Present worth

895,644 $

28,126 $

587,631 $

The owner should select the proposal no. 2, because it is the economical one

The salvage value is the assumed value of the three alternatives after the useful life and the maintenance (annual cost) cost of the three alternatives

The proposed material alternative is the solidified bacterial sand as it achieves the best economical material from the other two alternatives.

6 Results

A comparison between three different materials was done through a feasibility study using the present worth method. The three material in the process were as following:

The first alternative was the reinforced concrete, while the second alternative was Bacillus pasteurii material, and the third one was the rammed earth. The initial cost of each material was calculated according to the following aspects: cost of the material per meter square multiplied by the total area of the building, design cost of the architect, and the building license cost.

The design cost of the three alternatives were: 5%, 10%, and 7% respectively. It was obvious that the design cot of the Bacillus pasteurii was doubled the percentage of the reinforced concrete material due to the creativity and innovative design required for the design. The total initial cost demonstrated that the third alternative (rammed earth) was the highest in cost at 534,600 $, while the second alternative (Bacillus pasteurii) indicated the lowest cost at 24,175.8 $.

After that the replacement cost was figured according to the useful life of each material. Both Bacillus pasteurii and rammed earth had the longest useful life, each was considered at 100 years. The results showed that the total present worth replacement cost of the reinforced concrete material and rammed earth were inflated in cost at 2460 $ and 3544 $ respectively. On the other hand, the Bacillus pasteurii demonstrated much lower cost than the other alternatives at 1772 $. The maintenance cost also was considered at 1% of the initial cost for each alternative. Moreover, the salvage was deducted from the total present worth at 20% for each material.

Finally, the total present worth was deliberated for the three alternatives. The rammed earth material scored the highest cost among the other alternatives, which equaled 587,631 $. While the other two materials cost were as following: Reinforced concrete 895,644 $, and Bacillus pasteurii 28,126 $. Therefore, it was concluded that the second alternative was the most economical choice. After analyzing the economic feasibility of bacterial material to other materials a SWOT analysis for the selected site was carried out (as shown in Fig. 21) to help take the future decision.
Fig. 21

SWOT analysis for the selected site.

Source: Authors

7 Conclusions

Bio-material is able to compete the traditional materials in construction industry. The proposed material is more effective, economic than the traditional materials on the long run.

A feasibility study was carried out using the present worth method. Three alternative materials was applied for comparison. Based on the information presented in the pre-mentioned feasibility study done to choose the best material to be applied at the residential villa of Borg Al Arab. It is recommended that the owner should select the second proposal (Bacillus pasteurii material) because it is the most economical one.

The findings of the feasibility study show that this initiative will be highly beneficial to the organization and has a high probability of success. Key findings are as follows: The second option got the lowest initial cost, also the total PW of replacement cost is the lowest for the second alternative. Moreover, the second option got the lowest salvage cost, which means it got the lowest total amount of depreciation expense, and the present worth cost of maintenance was the modest among the three alternatives.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Manaugh G (2009). https://www.bldgblog.com/2009/04/sandstone/. Accessed 26 Nov 2017
  2. 2.
    Vahedi A (2009) Nature as a source of inspiration of architectural conceptual design. Master of Science in Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madden TJ, Hewett K, Roth MS (2000) Managing images in different cultures: a cross-national study of color meanings and preferences. J Int Mark 8(4):90–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cronbach L (1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. J Am Psychol 30:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Proshansky HM, Ittelson WH, Rivlin LC (1970) Environmental psychology: man and his physical setting. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Festinger L, Schacter S, Back K (1950) Social pressure in informal groups. Halper, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Soliman TM (1990) The impact of the surrounding environment on people's perception of major urban environmental attributes. J King Saud Univ 2:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panahi S, Mirzaei Q, Mohammadikia M (2013) Comparative analysis of natural elements in the architecture of Tabriz and Kashan Houses. Middle East J Sci Res 13:507–517Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Architecture and construction builders (2011) https://www.bonah.org/. Accessed Mar 2018
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica (2014) https://www.britannica.com/technology/reinforced-concrete/. Accessed Nov 2017
  16. 16.
    Magwood C (2017) Rammed earth construction basics. https://endeavourcentre.org/2017/01/rammed-earth-construction/. Accessed Feb 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdelaziz F. Mohamed
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mai Mokhtar
    • 2
  • Shaimaa Elghobashy
    • 2
  1. 1.Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime TransportAswanEgypt
  2. 2.Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime TransportAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations