Advertisement

SN Applied Sciences

, 1:1160 | Cite as

Fabrication of tungsten-iron-doped TiO2 nanotubes via anodization: new photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical cathodic protection under visible light

  • Mohamad Mohsen MomeniEmail author
  • S. Hamid Khansari-Zadeh
  • Hossein FarrokhpourEmail author
Research Article
  • 135 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. 4. Materials (general)

Abstract

The simultaneous doping of tungsten (W) and iron (Fe) into TiO2 nanotubes (W–Fe-TNTs) has been performed via one-step anodizing in different ratios of W and Fe in this work. The synthesized samples were characterized by the XRD, FE-SEM, EDX-mapping, and UV–Vis techniques which proved the appropriate formation of the doped samples. The photocathodic protection effect of the synthesized samples was also studied using electrochemical measurement techniques including OCP, chronoamperometry and Tafel polarization curves. The experimental results indicated that the samples could protect the 403SS from corrosion very well. The W–Fe-TNT sample with equal percentage of W and Fe showed the best photoelectrochemical anticorrosion effect for stainless steel under visible light illumination.

Keywords

Tungsten Iron Titanium dioxide Co-doping Anodization Photocathodic protection Corrosion 

1 Introduction

Metal corrosion is a kind of silent destruction which takes place almost for all metals in nature except for noble metals such as Au and Pt [1]. Since, the metals have many applications in industry and human life, the prevention of their corrosion is inevitable. For example, stainless steel (SS) is a crucial material used in marine equipment due to its benefits of corrosion resistance, stability and hardness. Because of the presence of chloride anion in oceans, steel is vulnerable to localized corrosion [2, 3]. According to different corrosion mechanisms, various methods have been used for metal corrosion prevention including cathodic protection and anticorrosion coatings [4, 5, 6]. Recently, semiconductors such as TiO2 have been used for the photocathodic protection of SS. Titanium dioxide is an n-type semiconductor with interesting electrochemical and photoelectrochemical activities [7, 8]. The special interest to TiO2 as semiconductor for photoelectric conversion [9] and photocatalyst [10] purposes is mainly due to its stability [11], non-toxicity [12], and low cost [13]. TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs) compared to TiO2 particles have been extensively used in solar cells, sensors, environmental purification, and photoelectrodes because of their vast surface areas, great controllability, premier electron transport properties, and supreme physicochemical property [14]. On the other hand, pure TiO2 film due to its wide energy band gap (Eg = 3.2 eV) cannot impressively absorb light in visible region. It is difficult to maintain photocathodic protection in the absence of light because of the fast recombination of the photogenerated electron–hole (e–h+) pairs, and it is essential to prepare TNTs for extending the light absorption ranges and improve the photoelectrochemical performances of TiO2 [15].

Various strategies including doping with nonmetal or metal elements have been adopted to extend the photoresponse into visible spectral range, improve separation rate of e–h+ and ultimately promote photocathodic protection. Ni–TiO2 samples prepared by sol–gel were used as photoanodes for PEC cathodic protection performance of 304SS and 316LSS, respectively. Liu et al. prepared Fe–TiO2 photoanodes by LPD method and showed their excellent PEC cathodic protection performance for 304SS. Also our previous studies showed that deposition of nickel–platinum on the surface of Fe-doped TiO2 nanotube films is a promising technology to improve the PEC cathodic protection to some metals such as 304SS. Usually, the doped ions create additional energy levels into the band structure, which can be used to trap electrons or holes to separate carriers from the bands, thus allowing more carriers to successfully diffuse to the surface [16, 17, 18, 19]. Yu et al. proposed a new approach for inhibiting of localized corrosion of SS by constructing a super hydrophobic WO3–TiO2 hierarchical nanoflake surface on the Fe–W amorphous alloys formed on SS [20]. Li et al. [22] enhanced the photocathodic protection of 304SS under visible light irradiation using Ag-graphene–TiO2 composite. Ren et al. synthesized polypyrrole-TiO2 nanotube arrays with excellent visible light response protection by anodic oxidation and electro-polymerization method for the photocathodic protection of coupled Q235 carbon steel under white light irradiation [23]. Sun et al. provided an approach for the design and synthesis of composite films 3D ZnIn2S4 nanosheet-TiO2 nanowire arrays and used them to enhance the photocathodic protection of 304SS [23]. Cheng et al. studied the effect of SiO2 doping on photogenerated cathodic protection of nano-TiO2 films on 304SS. They showed that the 10% SiO2–TiO2 film is the best for the photogenerated cathodic performance [24]. The NiO–TiO2 pn heterojunction composites were synthesized by Han et al. using electroless plating and annealing, which resulted in TiO2 nanotube arrays coated with a layer of NiO particles. Produced composites exhibited great photoelectrochemical performance, which provided better photocathodic protection for 304SS [14].

In the present study, TiO2 nanotubes were simultaneously doped with Fe and W by the one-step anodizing method at different ratios of Fe and W and the prepared structures were characterized by FE-SEM, EDX-mapping, XRD, and UV–Vis techniques. In addition, their performance in photocathodic protection of 403SS under the illumination of Xe lamp in a corrosive media was investigated. To the author’s knowledge, simultaneous doping of Fe and W with different ratios by the one-step anodizing method has not been reported in literature. This work is the first experimental study on the effect of simultaneous doping of two cations on photocathodic protection of 403SS.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Sample preparation

The pure Ti foils were cleaned in acetone, ethanol, and deionized water for 10 min, respectively, and dried in air. The TiO2 nanotube films were fabricated in prepared solutions with different ratios of W and Fe (see Table 1) by an anodic oxidation method at 40 V for 8 h with a Pt counter electrode. Then, the samples were annealed at 450 C for 2 h in air at a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and naturally cooled down. Figure 1a shows, schematically, the preparation of W–Fe-TNTs.
Table 1

The experimental parameters for the synthesis of each sample

Samples

Anodizing solution

K0

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O

K1

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O + 12 mM K3FeCN6

K2

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O + 9 mM K3FeCN6 + 3 mM Na2O4W

K3

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O + 6 mM K3FeCN6 + 6 mM Na2O4W

K4

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O + 3 mM K3FeCN6 + 9 mM Na2O4W

K5

97 mL DMSO + 2 mL HF + 1 mL H2O + 12 mM Na2O4W

Fig. 1

a Schematic for the preparation of W–Fe-TNTs and b the experimental setup for photogenerated cathodic protection coupled with 403SS

2.2 Characterization of morphology and chemical composition

The morphologies of the synthesized samples were determined by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Quanta™ 450 FEG). The chemical composition of the samples was analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX: Seron AIS 2300, Korea). The crystallographic structure of the W–Fe-TNTs was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Asenware AW-DX 300). A (JASCO V-570) spectrophotometer was used to record the UV–Vis light absorption spectra of the samples.

2.3 Electrochemical measurements

Electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature using an Origa flex electrochemical workstation (OGF500 potentiostat/galvanostat, France). The schematic of the experimental setup for the photoelectrochemical measurements is demonstrated in Fig. 1b. The electrolyte of the corrosion and PEC cells was 3.5 wt% NaCl and 0.1 mol L−1 Na2S + 0.2 mol L−1 NaOH, respectively. The connection between electrolyte solutions in these two cells was fulfilled by a salt bridge. The Ag–AgCl (reference) and Pt (counter) electrodes along with 403SS were placed in the corrosion cell. W–Fe-TNTs were placed in the PEC cell and connected to the 403SS as working electrode. In addition, a xenon lamp (55 W) with 200 mW cm−2 intensity was used as light source for illumination.

3 Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows typical FE-SEM images of the K1–K5 films prepared by one-step electrochemical anodizing. (FE-SEM images of the K0 film have been reported in previous work) [25]. The formation of nanotubes is clearly seen in Fig. 2 so that the morphology of nanotubes is recognizable. The average inner diameter of nanotubes is approximately 157 nm. As seen in Fig. 2, the nanotubes were uniformly distributed on the entire sample surface. Also, the change in the morphology of nanotubes due to the presence of W is evident from the FE-SEM images. In addition, when both metals are present in the sample (see K2, K3, and K4), the structure of the nanotubes changed and looked like nanocoil, which could be due to the different conduction of each anodizing solutions.
Fig. 2

FE-SEM images of W–Fe-TNT samples; a, a′ K1, b, b′ K2, c, c′ K3, d, d′ K4, e, e′ K5

The XRD pattern of the prepared W–Fe-TNT films is demonstrated in Fig. 3. In these patterns, the diffraction peaks located at 25.2° and 48.0° are the characteristic peaks of TiO2 in the form of anatase structure. The peaks observed at 35.0°, 38.5°, 40.1°, 53.0°, 62.9°, 70.6°, 76.2°, and 77.3° suggest the existence of Ti. Moreover, the presence of WO3 and Fe2O3 peaks confirmed that co-doping of TiO2 nanotubes has been successfully performed. The sharpness of the peaks in the XRD patterns confirms that the samples have been crystallized, perfectly.
Fig. 3

XRD patterns of different samples; a K0, b K1, c K2, d K3, e K4, f K5

The synthesized samples were analyzed by EDAX for recognizing the existent elements (see Fig. 4). The peaks related to titanium were observed clearly between 3.4 and 5.1 keV in all images. Because of the low concentration of W and Fe, their peaks appeared with low intensity. Figure 5 shows the EDX‐mapping analysis of K3, and it can be clearly seen that the elements have been distributed homogeneously at the sample surfaces.
Fig. 4

EDAX spectra of the samples; a K1, b K2, c K3, d K4, e K5

Fig. 5

EDX-mapping analysis obtained from K3

Figure 6 demonstrates the UV–Vis absorption spectra of pure TiO2 and W–Fe-TNTs samples. It is obvious that due to the doping with the W and Fe, the absorption spectra of W–Fe-TNT films display a significant redshift to the visible light region. Band gap energy of all samples was calculated using Tauc plot [26] which has been decreased compared to TiO2 nanotubes (3.2 eV). Table 2 shows the calculated band gap energies of W–Fe-TNTs samples.
Fig. 6

a UV–Vis spectrum of W–Fe-TNTs, b plot of (Ahυ)1/2 versus

Table 2

The band gap energies of different W–Fe-TNTs samples

Samples

Band gap energy (eV)

K1

1.83

K2

1.75

K3

1.40

K4

151

K5

1.90

After preparing samples and performing several characterization tests including FE-SEM, XRD, EDX-mapping, and UV–Vis, it can be concluded that the fabrication of the W–Fe-TNT films has been successfully carried out by one-step anodizing.

The OCP variations of the 403SS electrode coupled with various prepared films as photoelectrodes are shown in Fig. 7a. As can be seen, by turning on the light, the OCP patterns of all samples show a significant negative shift. It is clear that by doping of TiO2 with metals, the photopotential values of synthesized samples decrease to more negative potential compared to pure TiO2 which shows the enhancement in photocathodic protection (see Table 3). The OCP pattern of W–Fe-TNTs drops immediately and remains in a range of − 300 to − 530 mV, which was far better than of corrosion potential of 403SS. It is clear that co-doping of W and Fe, especially for K3 sample, shows the best result than the other samples and markedly improves the photocathodic protection efficiency of the TiO2.
Fig. 7

a OCP variations of 403SS coupled with fabricated samples, b photoresponse spectra, c Tafel curves of pure 403SS electrode and 403SS coupled with W–Fe-TNT electrodes under illumination light

Table 3

Potential obtained from OCPs for 403SS coupled with samples under illumination

Samples

OCP (mV) under illumination

403SS

− 160

K0 (TiO2)

− 220

K1

− 300

K2

− 455

K3

− 530

K4

− 435

K5

− 321

Figure 7b illustrates chronoamperometry curves of the 403SS, pure TiO2, and W–Fe-TNT films with several on–off cycles of light illumination. All the fabricated samples show excellent photoresponses compared to pure TiO2. When the light is turn-on, the photocurrent increases, rapidly, and its values become nearly constant during the illumination. The photocurrent decreases, rapidly, and reaches to initial values when the light is turn-off. K3 sample indicated the best result in comparison with other samples. The increase in the photocurrent is due to the considerable increase in the number of electrons and holes under the illumination. The rapid increase and decrease in photocurrent in Fig. 7b show that the charge transport occurs in the film very quickly [18, 19, 27].

Corrosion resistance of W–Fe-TNT films coupled with 403SS was measured via Tafel polarization measurements under the light illumination (see Fig. 7c). The polarization potentials of the synthesized samples showed a significant negative shift compared to bare 403SS which indicated that both pure TiO2 and W–Fe-TNTs can serve as protector to prevent the 403SS from corrosion. By co-doping of TiO2, the corrosion potential was, considerably, decreased to negative potential compared to pure TiO2 which can be a favorable path for transferring enough photogenerated electrons to the 403SS electrode. Also, the increase in polarization current densities of samples can be due to the enhancement of electrochemical reaction at the interface resulting from the polarization of photogenerated electrons [27]. K3 indicated the best result in comparison with other samples.

The photocatalytic chemical stability of synthesized photoanodes was measured for 35 min at 0.40 V versus Ag–AgCl where the photocurrent density of these samples was not decreased and samples held their high photocatalytic activity for a long period of time, as observed in Fig. 8. Additionally, the photocurrent density of all samples was returned to their original state which shows sensitivity to illumination during a long period of time.
Fig. 8

The photocatalytic chemical stability of all prepared samples

4 Conclusion

The W–Fe-TNT films with different W and Fe ratios have been successfully prepared via one-step anodization to inhibit 403SS corrosion. The results showed that these samples are significantly useful for the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes, as confirmed by the OCP, chronoamperometry and Tafel polarization curves. W–Fe-TNTs especially K3, showed a notable photocathodic protection effect toward the 403SS, and based on the results, it can be claimed that these samples are promising materials for metal corrosion protection.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Bu Y, Ao JP (2017) A review on photoelectrochemical cathodic protection semiconductor thin films for metals. Green Energy Environ 2:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuan S, Liang B, Zhao Y, Pehkonen SO (2013) Surface chemistry and corrosion behaviour of 304 stainless steel in simulated seawater containing inorganic sulphide and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Corros Sci 74:353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian W, Du N, Li S, Chen S, Wu Q (2014) Metastable pitting corrosion of 304 stainless steel in 3.5% NaCl solution. Corros Sci 85:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tawfik SM (2015) Alginate surfactant derivatives as an ecofriendly corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in acidic environments. RSC Adv 5:104535–104550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdullayev E, Abbasov V, Tursunbayeva A, Portnov V, Ibrahimov H, Mukhtarova G, Lvov Y (2013) Self-healing coatings based on halloysite clay polymer composites for protection of copper alloys. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4464–4471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farahi A, Bentiss F, Jama C, El Mhammedi MA, Bakasse M (2017) A new approach in modifying ethylene glycol methacrylate phosphate coating formulation by adding sodium montmorillonite to increase corrosion resistance properties. J Alloy Compd 723:1032–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radhakrishnan S, Siju CR, Mahanta D, Patil S, Madras G (2009) Conducting polyaniline-nano-TiO2 composites for smart corrosion resistant coatings. Electrochim Acta 54:1249–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Altın İ, Sökmen M, Bıyıklıoğlu Z (2016) Sol gel synthesis of cobalt doped TiO2 and its dye sensitization for efficient pollutant removal. Mater Sci Semicond Process 45:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ha TT, Chi CH, Vy NT, Thoa NT, Huynh TD, Lam QV (2015) Improving the performance of QDSSC s based on TiO2/CdS (Silar)/CdSe (Colloid)/Zns (Silar) photoanodes. Environ Prog Sustain 34:1774–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu Z, Yang W, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2014) Passivated n-p co-doping of niobium and nitrogen into self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays for enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B Environ 144:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang Q, Long M, Tan L, Zhang Y, Ouyang J, Liu P, Tang A (2015) Helical TiO2 nanotube arrays modified by Cu-Cu2O with ultrahigh sensitivity for the nonenzymatic electro-oxidation of glucose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:12719–12730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu MM, Li J, Sun WJ, Jiang M, Zhang FX (2014) Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of composite materials of copper (II) porphyrin/TiO2. J Mater Sci 49:5519–5528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Zhang R, Li J, Li L, Lin S (2014) First-principles study on transition metal-doped anatase TiO2. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Han C, Shao Q, Lei J, Zhu Y, Ge S (2017) Preparation of NiO/TiO2 p-n heterojunction composites and its photocathodic protection properties for 304 stainless steel under simulated solar light. J Alloy Compd 703:530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang J, Hu J, Zhu YF, Liu Q, Zhang H, Du RG, Lin CJ (2015) Fabrication of CdTe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots sensitized TiO2 nanotube films for photocathodic protection of stainless steel. Corros Sci 99:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun MM, Chen ZY, Yu JQ (2013) Highly efficient visible light induced photoelectrochemical anticorrosion for 304 SS by Ni-doped TiO2. Electrochim Acta 109:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu Y, Xu C, Feng ZD (2014) Characteristics and anticorrosion performance of Fe-doped TiO2 films by liquid phase deposition method. Appl Surf Sci 314:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li H, Wang X, Zhang L, Hou B (2015) Preparation and photocathodic protection performance of CdSe/reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 composite. Corros Sci 94:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Momeni MM, Ghayeb Y, Moosavi N (2018) Preparation of Ni–Pt/Fe–TiO2 nanotube films for photoelectrochemical cathodic protection of 403 stainless steel. Nanotechnology 29:425701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu SQ, Ling YH, Wang RG, Zhang J, Qin F, Zhang ZJ (2018) Constructing superhydrophobic WO3@TiO2 nanoflake surface beyond amorphous alloy against electrochemical corrosion on iron steel. Appl Surf Sci 436:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li H, Wang X, Wei Q, Liu X, Qian Z, Hou B (2017) Enhanced photocathodic protection performance of Ag/graphene/TiO2 composite for 304SS under visible light. Nanotechnology 28:225701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ren J, Qian B, Li J, Song Z, Hao L, Shi J (2016) Highly efficient polypyrrole sensitized TiO2 nanotube films for photocathodic protection of Q235 carbon steel. Corros Sci 111:596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun W, Wei N, Cui H, Lin Y, Wang X, Tian J, Wen J (2018) 3D ZnIn2S4 nanosheet/TiO2 nanowire arrays and their efficient photocathodic protection for 304 stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci 434:1030–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng W, Li C, Ma X, Yu L, Liu G (2017) Effect of SiO2-doping on photo generated cathodic protection of nano-TiO2 films on 304 stainless steel. Mater Des 126:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hosseini MG, Momeni MM, Faraji M (2011) Electro-oxidation of hydrazine on gold nanoparticles supported on TiO2 nanotube matrix as a new high active electrode. J Mol Catal A Chem 335:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Momeni MM, Ghayeb Y, Moosavi N (2018) Study of various aliphatic alcohols as sacrificial agents on photoelectrochemical behavior of nickel-platinum-modified Cr-TiO2 nanotubes. J Solid State Electr 22:3137–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Momeni MM, Taghinejad M, Ghayeb Y, Bagheri R, Song Z (2019) Preparation of various boron-doped TiO2 nanostructures by in situ anodizing method and investigation of their photoelectrochemical and photocathodic protection properties. J Iran Chem Soc 16:1839–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations