The Postdigital Human: Making the History of the Future

  • Steve Fuller
  • Petar Jandrić

Steve Fuller is Auguste Comte Professor of Social Epistemology in the Department of Sociology at the University of Warwick, UK. A product of Jesuit education (Regis High School in New York City), Steve was a John Jay Scholar at Columbia University where he graduated number two in his class of 1979. Columbia awarded Steve a Kellett Fellowship to study at Cambridge University for what turned out to be two of the most decisive years in recent British history (1979–1981). He subsequently earned an M.Phil. in history and philosophy of science, which he followed up with a Ph.D. at the University of Pittsburgh, where he was an Andrew Mellon Fellow. He was awarded a D.Litt. by the University of Warwick in 2007 for sustained lifelong contributions to scholarship. He is also a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, the UK Academy of Social Sciences, and the European Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Steve is best known for his foundational work in the field of ‘social epistemology’, which is the name...


  1. Barron, C. (2003). A strong distinction between humans and non-humans is no longer required for research purposes: A debate between Bruno Latour and Steve fuller. History of the Human Sciences, 16(2), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From anthropocentric humanism to critical Posthumanism in digital education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collin, F. (2011). Science studies as naturalized philosophy. Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  5. Fuller, S. (1988/2002). Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fuller, S. (1989/1993). Philosophy of science and its discontents. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fuller, S. (1996). Recent work in social epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 149–166.Google Scholar
  8. Fuller, S. (1999). The science wars: Who exactly is the enemy? Social Epistemology, 13(3–4), 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuller, S. (2000). The Governance of Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, S. (2003). Kuhn vs. popper: The struggle for the soul of science. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  11. Fuller, S. (2006a). The philosophy of science and technology studies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, S. (2006b). The new sociological imagination. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller, S. (2013). Preparing for life in humanity 2.0. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuller, S. (2015a). Knowledge: The philosophical quest in history. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller, S. (2015b). Customised science as a reflection of ‘Protscience’. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 46(4), 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuller, S. (2015c). Intelligent Design: Ten Years after Dover. ABC Religion & Ethics, 22 December. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  18. Fuller, S. (2016a). The academic Caesar: University leadership is hard. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuller, S. (2016b). Science has always been a bit ‘post-truth’. The Guardian, 15 December. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  20. Fuller, S. (2017). Review of The Age of Em: Love, Work and Life when Robots Rule the Earth by R. Hanson. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuller, S. (2018). Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game. London: Anthem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuller, S. & Collier, J. H. (2004/2012). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning for Science and Technology Studies. (Orig. 1993, by fuller). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuller, S., & Lipinska, V. (2014). The Proactionary imperative: A Foundation for transhumanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gordin, M. (2015). Scientific babel: From the fall of Latin to the rise of English. London: Profile.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harding, S. (Ed.). (2011). The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Huxley, T. (1893). Romanes Lecture. Oxford Magazine, May. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  29. Jandrić, P. (2016). The methodological challenge of networked learning: (post) disciplinarity and critical emancipation. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 165–181). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jandrić, P. (2018). Post-truth and critical pedagogy of trust. In M. A. Peters, S. Rider, M. Hyvönen, & T. Besley (Eds.), Post-truth, fake news: Viral Modernity & Higher Education (pp. 101–111). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, L. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kristensen, R. G., & Claycomb, R. M. (Eds.). (2010). Writing against the curriculum: Antidisciplinarity in the writing and cultural studies classroom. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Lawrence, R. J., & Després, C. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marx, K. (1932). The German Ideology. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  37. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976/1848). The Communist Manifesto. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  38. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2015). Revolutionary critical pedagogy is made by walking – In a world where many worlds coexist. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Pedagogy of Insurrection: From Resurrection to Revolution (pp. 255–298). New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2017a). From liberation to salvation: Revolutionary critical pedagogy meets liberation theology. Policy Futures in Education, 15(5), 620–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2017b). Peter McLaren’s liberation theology: Karl Marx meets Jesus Christ. In J. S. Brooks & A. Normore (Eds.), Leading against the grain: Lessons for creating just and equitable schools (pp. 39–48). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2018). Karl Marx and liberation theology: Dialectical materialism and Christian spirituality in, against, and beyond contemporary capitalism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(2), 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miranda, J. P. (1980). Marx against the Marxists: The Christian Humanism of Karl Marx. Trans. Drury J. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  43. Montgomery, S. (2000). Science in translation: Movements of knowledge through cultures and times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  45. Nicolescu, B. (2008). In vitro and in vivo knowledge – Methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity – Theory and practice (pp. 1–22). New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nida, E. (1964). Toward a science of translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  47. Schaffner, F. J. (1968). Planet of the Apes [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
  48. Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life? Dublin: Trinity College. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  49. Shadish, W., & Fuller, S. (Eds.). (1993). The social psychology of science. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  51. Steinmetz, K. (2016). Oxford’s word of the year for 2016 is ‘post-truth’. Time, November 15. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  52. Swanson, D. (1986). Undiscovered public knowledge. The Library Quarterly, 56(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. The Breakthrough Institute (2015). Breakthrough Dialogue 2015: The Good Anthropocene. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  54. U.S. District court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. (2005). 400 F. Supp. 2d 707. Accessed 15 May 2018.
  55. Weiss, S. (2012). Review of humanity 2.0 by Steve fuller. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 1(3), 6–9.Google Scholar
  56. Young, G. (2012). Russian cosmism: The esoteric futurism of Nikolai Federov and his followers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Zagreb University of Applied SciencesZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations