Performance Evaluation of Moment-Resisting Steel Frame Buildings Under Seismic and Blast-Induced Vibrations

  • Muhammed Zain KangdaEmail author
  • Sachin Bakre
Original Paper



The paper is an attempt to evaluate the efficiency of passive control techniques such as base isolation system (e.g. Lead/Rubber Bearing) and fluid viscous dampers subjected to earthquake ground motions and underground blast-induced vibrations. Two moment-resisting steel frame buildings are analyzed to evaluate the structural responses under dynamic excitations. The effect of vertical irregularity on the performance of passive control techniques in mitigating the responses of the building is also studied.


Non-linear dynamic analysis has been conducted on regular and irregular steel structures. The study investigates the effect of isolation period on the structural responses. The isolators are designed based on the design procedures developed by various researchers. The technical specifications of fluid viscous dampers have been selected from M/s Taylor Devices, USA.


The structural responses and energy dissipated by these control techniques is evaluated and a comparative study is also carried out amongst control techniques under blast and seismic excitations.


Both the selected passive control techniques have proved to be very effective in reducing the structural responses and forces induced in the building owing to ground-induced vibration.


Blast-induced vibration Base isolation Energy dissipation Earthquake Fluid viscous damper Passive techniques 


  1. 1.
    BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) (1973) IS 6922: Indian Standard criteria for safety and design of structures subject to underground blast, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) (1968) IS 4991: Indian standard criteria for blast resistant design of structures for explosions above ground, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UFC 3-340-02 (2008) Department of Defense-Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions, Washington, DC, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FEMA 428 (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2003) Primer to Design Safe School Projects in Case of Terrorist Attacks, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NATO AC/258-D/258 (1993) Manual of NATO safety principles for the storage of NATO ammunition and explosives, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar R, Choudhury D, Bhargava K (2013) Prediction of blast-induced vibration parameters for soil sites. Int J Geomech. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rigas F, Ioannis S (1999) Amplification effects of soil stratification on ground stress waves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(7):611–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu C, Lu Y, Hao H, Lim WK, Zhou Y, Seah CC (2003) Characterisation of underground blast-induced ground motions from large-scale field tests. Shock Waves 13(3):237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu C, Hao H (2005) Numerical study of characteristics of underground blast induced surface ground motion and their effect on above-ground structures. Part I. Ground motion characteristics. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mondal PD, Ghosh AD, Chakraborty S (2017) Performances of various base isolation systems in mitigation of structural vibration due to underground blast induced ground motion. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 17(4):1750043MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu C, Hao H, Lu Y, Sun S (2004) Numerical simulation of structural responses on a sand layer to blast induced ground excitations. Comput Struct 82(9):799–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mondal PD, Ghosh A, Chakraborty S (2014) Control of underground blast induced vibration of structures using fluid viscous damper. J Vib Eng Technol 2(1):27–33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soong TT, Dargush GF (1997) Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–180Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Su L, Ahmadi G, Tadjbakhsh IG (1989) A comparative study of performances of various base isolation systems, part I: shear beam structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 18(1):11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jangid RS (1996) Seismic response of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(11):1301–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naeim F (2001) The seismic design handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 724–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Necdet T (2004) Seismic isolation and energy dissipating systems in earthquake resistant design. In: Proc. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, 13WCEE, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodrigo MM, Romero ML (2003) An optimum retrofit strategy for moment resisting frames with nonlinear viscous dampers for seismic applications. Eng Struct 25(7):913–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Constantinou MC, Tadjbakhsh IG (1985) Hysteretic dampers in base isolation: random approach. J Struct Eng 111(4):705–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly JM, Leitmann G, Soldatos AG (1987) Robust control of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation. J Optim Theory Appl 53(2):159–180MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson EA, Ramallo JC, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK (2002) Intelligent base isolation systems. Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jangid RS, Kelly JM (2001) Base isolation for near-fault motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(5):691–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, Chassiakos AG, Claus RO, Masri SF, Skelton RE, Soong TT, Spencer BF, Yao JT (1997) Structural control: past, present, and future. J Eng Mech 123(9):897–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin YY, Tsai MH, Hwang JS, Chang KC (2002) Direct Displacement based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems. Eng Struct 25(1):25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kokil AS, Shrikhande M (2007) Optimal placement of supplemental dampers in seismic design of structures. J Seismol Earthq Eng 9(3):125–135Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singh MP, Moreschi LM (2002) Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(4):955–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dargush GF, Sant RS (2005) Evolutionary aseismic design and retrofit of structures with passive energy dissipation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(13):1601–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park JH, Kim J, Min KW (2004) Optimal design of added visco elastic dampers and supporting braces. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(4):465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Di Sarno L, Chioccarelli E, Cosenza E (2011) Seismic response analysis of an irregular base isolated building. Bull Earthq Eng 9(5):1673–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cancellara D, Angelis FD (2017) Assessment and dynamic nonlinear analysis of different base isolation systems for a multi-storey RC building irregular in plan. Comput Struct 180:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goel RK (2004) Seismic response control of irregular structures using nonlinear dampers. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hinman EE (1989) Shock response of buried structures subject blast. Proc., ASCE Spec. Conf. on Structures for Enhanced Safety and Physical Security, 191–202Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carvalho EM, Battista RC (2003) Blast-induced vibrations in urban residential buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 156(3):243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar R, Choudhury D, Bhargava K (2016) Determination of blast-induced ground vibration equations for rocks using mechanical and geological properties. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(3):341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    CSI (Computers and Structures Inc.) (2004) SAP2000 v10 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures.CSI, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Whittle JK, Williams MS, Karavasilis TL, Blakeborough A (2012) A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design. J Earthq Eng 16(4):540–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    BS (British Standard) (2004) EN-1998-1- Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildingsGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) (2016) IS 1893 (Part 1)-Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1—general provisions and buildings, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    UBC (Uniform building code) (1997) International conference of building officials (ICBO), Whittier, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Uang CM, Bertero VV (1990) Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Haskell G, Lee D (1996) Fluid viscous damping as an alternative to base isolation. Asme Publ Pvp 330:35–40Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ras A, Boumechra N (2014) Study of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers behaviour in seismic steel structures design. Arab J Sci Eng 39(12):8635–8648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Narkhede DI, Sinha R (2014) Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations. J Sound Vib 333(1):80–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KrishteleMaging Solutions Private Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mechanics DepartmentVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Applied MechanicsVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations