Advertisement

Computational Study on the Steady Loading Noise of Drone Propellers: Noise Source Modeling with the Lattice Boltzmann Method

  • Chun Hyuk Park
  • Dae Han Kim
  • Young J. MoonEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In the present study, a new computational methodology is explored to compute the acoustic field of drone propellers using noise source modeling with the lattice Boltzmann method. A simple mathematical model of steady loading noise for predicting the blade passing frequency (BPF) tone and harmonics at low frequencies (100–1000 Hz) is proposed and tested for various types of drone propellers. The computed result is in a reasonably good agreement with NASA’s measured sound pressure level (SPL) for APC-SF and DJI-CF two-blade single drone propellers rotating at 3600–6000 revolutions per minute. It replicates well the feature of an even number of BPF harmonics for the tested model propellers, showing the decaying slope of \(-\,6\) for the first two BPF and harmonic peaks in the SPL spectrum. Notably, the proposed steady loading noise model shows all components of RPS harmonics with different magnitudes for different blade sizes and rotor arrangements, such as tricopter and quadcopter. The proposed method can be used for predicting and analyzing tones at low frequencies for various types of open rotor systems, such as multicopters and distributed electric propulsion vehicles.

Keywords

Drone propeller noise Computational aeroacoustics Steady loading noise source modeling Lattice Boltzmann method 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Barmpounakis NE, Vlahogianni IE, Golias CJ (2016) Unmanned aerial aircraft systems for transportation engineering: current practice and future challenges. Int J Transp Sci Technol 5(3):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christian A, Cabell R (2017) Initial investigation into the psychoacoustic properties of small unmanned aerial system noise. In: 17th AIAA aviation techonology, integration and operations conferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brentner SK, Farassat F (2003) Modeling aerodynamically generated sound of helicopter rotors. Prog Aerosp Sci 39(2–3):83–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurtz DW, Marte JE (1970) A review of aerodynamic noise from propellers, rotors, and lift fans. NASA Technical Report, USGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kikolas SZ, Douglas Boyd D Jr, Casey LB (2016) Acoustic characterization and prediction of representative, small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft system components. In: AHS international 72nd annual forumGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Intaratep N, Alexander WN, Devenport WJ (2016) Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions. In: 22nd AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tinney EC, Sirohi J (2018) Multirotor drone noise at static thrust. AIAA J 56(7):2816–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ffowcs Wiliams JE, Hawkings DL, Lighthill JM (1969) Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 264(1151):321–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo YP (2000) Application of the Ffowcs Williams/Hawkings equation to two-dimensional problems. J Fluid Mech 403:201–221MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bres AG, Perot F, Freed D (2009) Properties of the Lattice-Boltzmann method for acoustics. In: 15th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics Conference, Miami, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lim YH, Kwon SH, Kim KH, Ahn HS (2017) Implementation of load transportation using multiple quadcopters. In: IEEE international conference on advance intelligent mechatronics, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim HD, Perry AT, Ansell PJ (2018) A review of distributed electric propulsion concepts for air vehicle technology. In: AIAA/IEEE electric aircraft technologies symposium, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu Z, LIU Y, Debiasi M, Khoo BC (2016) Acoustic characteristics of a multi-rotor MAV and its noise reduction technology. InternoiseGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bao YB, Meskas J (2011) Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid simulations. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Q, He YL (2016) Three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann model for convection heat transfer in porous media at the REV scale. arXiv:1611.03329
  16. 16.
    Humieres D, Ginzburg I, Krafczyk M, Lallemand P, Luo L, Bushnell DM (2002) Multiple-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann models in 3D. In: Institute for computer applications in science and engineering, Hampton, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim DH, Park CH, Moon YJ (2019) Identification of loading-noise sources of drone propeller by 3D transient Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computations. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci (in print)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCormick BW (1995) Aerodynamics, aeronautics, and flight mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Fluid Dynamics and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Mechanical EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations