Advertisement

Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Fixed L-ribs to the Damage Behavior of Integrated Composite T-joint Subject to Low Velocity Impact

  • Rujian Zhu
  • Xiwu XuEmail author
  • Chunjian Mao
Original Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of fixed L-ribs on the damage behavior of integrated composite T-joints subject to low velocity impact. Experimental test is performed on a vertical drop-weight testing device with two different impact energies. Detailed inspection by visual and ultrasonic C-scan reveals that different impact energies result in different damage types and shapes. Experimental results show that without fixed L-ribs the impact caused an elliptical damage around the impact point at the impact energy of 4.45 J/mm and a trumpet delamination at the impact energy of 8.90 J/mm. In comparison, the impact only caused serious damage around the impact point without delamination at the impact energy of 8.90 J/mm with fixed L-ribs. This experimental study has demonstrated that fixing the L-ribs is an effective way to prevent the delamination of the integrated composite T-joint subject to low velocity impact.

Keywords

T-joint Composite structure Low velocity impact Delamination 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160786).

References

  1. 1.
    Kolakowski Z, Kubiak T (2005) Load-carrying capacity of thin-walled composite structures. Compos Struc 67(4):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mair RI (2002) Advanced composite structures research in Australia. Compos Struc 57:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baur J, Silverman E (2007) Challenges and opportunities in multifunctional composite structures for aerospace applications. MRS Bull 32:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cezary G, Anita O, Jan HS (2016) Prestressed composite structures-Modeling, manufacturing, design. Compos Struct 151:172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malhotra A, Guild FJ, Pavier M (2008) Edge impact to composite laminates-experiments and simulations. J Mater Sci 43(20):6661–6667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breen C, Guild F, Pavier M (2006) Impact damage to thick carbon fibre reinforced plastic composite laminates. J Mater Sci 41:6718–6724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salvador B, Lorenzo M, Carmen B (2008) Reduced strength degradation of alumina-aluminium titanate composite subjected to low-velocity impact loading. J Eur Ceram Soc 28(15):2923–2931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raffael B, Janko K, Tobias W (2018) Review and benchmark study on the analysis of low-velocity impact on composite laminates. Eng Fail Anal 86:72–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang D, Shu D (2005) Local displacement of core in two-layer sandwich composite structures subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struc 71:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C (2012) Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struc 94(9):2902–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tiberkak R, Bachene M, Rechak S (2008) Damage prediction in composite plates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struc 83:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang S, Wu L, Li M (2010) Low-velocity impact and residual tensile strength analysis to carbon fiber composite laminates. Mater Design 31:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitrevski T, Marshall IH, Thomson RS (2006) Low-velocity impacts on preloaded GFRP specimens with various impactor shapes. Compos Struc 76(3):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson T, Madenci E (2000) Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites. Compos Struc 50(3):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cantwell WJ (2007) Geometrical effects in the low velocity impact response of GFRP. Compos Sci Technol 67(9):1900–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shanmugam NE, Ng YH, Richard Liew JY (2002) Behaviour of composite haunched beam connection. Eng Struct 24:1451–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trask RS, Hallett SR, Helenon FM (2012) Influence of process induced defects on the failure of composite T-joint specimens. Compos Part A-Appl S 43(4):748–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guo S, Morishima R (2011) Numerical analysis and experiment of composite sandwich T-joints subjected to pulling load. Compos Struc 94:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helenon F, Wisonm MR, Hallett SR (2013) Investigation into failure of laminated composite T-piece specimens under bending loading. Compos Part A-Appl S 54:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ermias GK, Giovanni B (2015) An experimental and finite element study of the transverse bending behavior of CFRP composite T-joints in vehicle structures. Compos Part B-Eng 79:430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferry D, Rodney S, Thomson H (2004) Geometry and damage effects in a composite marine T-joint. Compos Struc 66:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng Y, Zhang H, Tan X (2016) Effect of impact damage positions on the buckling and post-buckling behaviors of stiffened composite panel. Compos Struc 155:184–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun W, Guan ZD, Li ZS et al (2018) Modelling and simulating of the compressive behavior of T-stiffened composite panels subjected to stiffener impact. Compos Struc 186:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tan RM, Guan ZD, Sun W et al (2018) Experiment investigation on impact damage and influences on compression behaviors of single T-stiffened composite panels. Compos Struc 203:486–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li N, Chen PH (2016) Experimental investigation on edge impact damage and Compression after impact (CAI) behavior of stiffened composite panels. Compos Struc 138:134–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gui LJ, Cheng XQ, Kou CH (2000) Effects of stitching on strength and impact damage resistance of composite laminates. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 21(4):368–371Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical StructuresNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations