Advertisement

Effect of Orifice Geometry on Column Trajectories of Liquid Jets in Crossflows

  • Yoonho Song
  • Donghyun Hwang
  • Kyubok AhnEmail author
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Effects of orifice geometry on liquid column trajectories of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows were experimentally studied. One circular and four elliptical plain-orifice injectors with different aspect ratios of 1/3 to 3, were designed and utilized. By changing the injection pressure drop from 1 bar to 6 bar with an increment of 1 bar, and thus the liquid–air momentum flux ratio from 15 to 106, back-lit spray photographs of liquid jets in crossflows were taken and then analyzed using an in-house code to detect the upper boundary and centerline of the liquid jet before the breakup point. Analytical liquid column trajectories for circular and elliptical liquid jets were derived through simple assumptions and compared with present experimental data. It was found that the aspect ratio affected the difference between the analytical drag coefficient and the experimental one. Novel empirical equations for liquid column trajectories of circular and elliptical liquid jets in crossflows were suggested as a function of equivalent orifice diameter, liquid–air momentum flux ratio and aspect ratio. The results showed that the present empirical equation for the circular orifice injector could be reasonably applied to the elliptical orifice injectors when the aspect ratio was below one.

Keywords

Elliptical liquid jet Jet in a crossflow Liquid column trajectory 

List of symbols

AR

Aspect ratio (b/a)

a

Diameter of an elliptical orifice in the crossflow direction

b

Diameter of an elliptical orifice in the direction transverse to crossflows

CD

Drag coefficient

d

Diameter of a circular orifice

deq

Equivalent orifice diameter (d for a circular orifice and \( {\text{d}}_{\text{eq}} = \sqrt {ab} \) for an elliptical orifice)

df

Frontal diameter of liquid jet perpendicular to crossflows

ds

Side diameter of liquid jet parallel to crossflows

l

Orifice length

q

Liquid–air momentum flux ratio (\( {\text{q}} = \rho_{\text{l}} V_{\text{l}}^{2} /\rho_{\text{a}} u_{\text{a}}^{2} \))

R2

Coefficient of determination

ReL

Reynolds number based on the characteristic length (L = a)

t

Time

ua

Air velocity in the test section

ul

X-directional velocity of liquid column

Vl

Liquid jet exit velocity

Wea

Air Weber number (\( We_{\text{a}} = \rho_{\text{a}} u_{\text{a}}^{2} d_{\text{eq}} /\sigma \))

x

Distance in the crossflow direction from the center of an orifice exit

y

Distance in the direction transverse to crossflows from the center of an orifice exit

yc

Centerline of liquid column (yc = 0.5 × (yu + yl))

yl

Lower boundary of liquid column

yu

Upper boundary of liquid column

z

Distance in the spanwise direction

ΔP

Injection pressure drop

ρa

Air density in the test section

ρl

Liquid density

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Research Foundation Grants (NRF-2013R1A5A1073861, NRF-2017R1A1A1A05001237, and NRF-2018M1A3A3A02065683), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea. The authors would like to thank the MSIT for its support.

References

  1. 1.
    Hojnacki JT (1972) Ramjet engine fuel injection studies. AFAPL-TR-72-76. Air Force Aero Propulsion Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inamura T, Takahashi M, Kumakawa A (2001) Combustion characteristics of a liquid-fueled ramjet combustor. J Propuls Power 17(4):860–868.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samuelsen S, McDonell V (1999) Advance fuel injection strategies for high performance gas turbine engines. In: AGARD conference proceedings, AGARD-RTO-MP-14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    No SY (2015) A review on empirical correlations for jet/spray trajectory of liquid jet in uniform cross flow. Int J Spray Combust Dyn 7(4):283–314.  https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8277.7.4.283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang M, Broumand M, Birouk M (2016) Liquid jet trajectory in a subsonic gaseous cross-flow: an analysis of published correlations. At Sprays 26(11):1083–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.2016013485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broumand M, Birouk M (2016) Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: recent progress and remaining challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 57:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mashayek A, Ashgriz N (2011) Atomization of a liquid jet in a crossflow. In: Ashgriz N (ed) Handbook of atomization and sprays. Springer, New York, pp 657–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen TH, Smith CR, Schommer DG, Nejad AS (1993) Multi-zone behavior of transverse liquid jet in high-speed flow. AIAA Paper 1993-0453Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuller RP, Wu PK, Kirkendall KA, Nejad AS (2000) Effects of injection angle on atomization of liquid jets in transverse airflow. AIAA J 38(1):64–72.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schetz JA, Kush EA, Joshi PB (1980) Wave phenomena in liquid jet breakup in a supersonic crossflow. AIAA J 18(7):774–778.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inamura T, Nagai N (1997) Spray characteristics of liquid jet traversing subsonic airstreams. J Propuls Power 13(2):250–256.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu PK, Kirkendall KA, Fuller RP, Nejad AS (1997) Breakup processes of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows. J Propuls Power 13(1):64–73.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sallam KA, Aalburg C, Faeth GM (2004) Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow. AIAA J 42(12):2529–2540.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahn K, Kim J, Yoon Y (2006) Effects of orifice internal flow on transverse injection into subsonic crossflows: cavitation and hydraulic flip. At Sprays 16(1):15–34.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.v16.i1.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    No SY (2013) Empirical correlations for breakup length of liquid jet in uniform cross flow-a review. J ILASS Korea 18(1):35–43.  https://doi.org/10.15435/JILASSKR.2013.18.1.035 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nguyen TT, Karagozian AR (1992) Liquid fuel jet in subsonic crossflow. J Propuls Power 8(1):21–29.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inamura T (2000) Trajectory of a liquid jet traversing subsonic airstreams. J Propuls Power 16(1):155–157.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becker J, Hassa C (2002) Breakup and atomization of a kerosene jet in crossflow at elevated pressure. At Sprays 12(1–3):49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.v12.i123.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iyogun CO, Birouk M, Popplewell N (2006) Trajectory of water jet exposed to low subsonic cross-flow. At Sprays 16(8):963–980.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.v16.i18.70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freitag S, Hassa C (2008) Spray characteristics of kerosene jet in crossflow of air at elevated pressure. ILASS-Europe Paper 08-12-1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song Y, Hwang D, Ahn K (2018) Spray characteristics of liquid jets in acoustically-forced crossflows. J Korean Soc Propuls Eng 22(2):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2018.22.2.001
  22. 22.
    Ku WK, Hong JG, Lee CW (2011) effect of internal flow structure in circular and elliptical nozzles on spray characteristics. At Sprays 21(8):655–672.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.2012004192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kasyap TV, Sivakumar D, Raghunandan BN (2008) Breakup of liquid jets emanating from elliptical orifices at low flow condition. At Sprays 18(7):645–668.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AomizSpr.v18.i7.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kasyap TV, Sivakumar D, Raghunandan BN (2009) Flow and breakup characteristics of elliptical liquid jets. Int J Multiph Flow 35(1):8–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song Y, Hwang D, Ahn K (2017) Effect of orifice geometry on flow characteristics of liquid jet from single hole nozzle. J Korean Soc Propuls Eng 21(5):19–28.  https://doi.org/10.6108/KSPE.2017.21.5.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    New TH, Lim TT, Luo SC (2003) Elliptic jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 494:119–140.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003005925 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lim TT, New TH, Luo SC (2006) Scaling of trajectories of elliptic jets in crossflow. AIAA J 44(12):3157–3160.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    New TH (2008) Near-Field Developments of elliptic jets in crossflow. J Turbul 9(24):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14685240802195177 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schetz JA, Padhye A (1977) Penetration and breakup of liquids in subsonic airstreams. AIAA J 15(10):1385–1390.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mashayek A, Jafari A, Ashgriz N (2008) Improved model for the penetration of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows. AIAA J 46(11):2674–2686.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marzbali SN (2011) Penetration of circular and elliptical liquid jets into gaseous crossflow: a combined theoretical and numerical study. Master Dissertation, Mechanical and Industrial Department, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Farvardin E, Dolatabadi A (2012) Breakup simulation of elliptical liquid jet in gaseous crossflow. AIAA Paper 2012-2817Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vennard JK (1961) Elementary fluid mechanics, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khan WA, Culham JR, Yovanovich MM (2005) Fluid flow around and heat transfer from elliptical cylinders: analytical approach. J Thermophys Heat Transf 19(2):178–185.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.10456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chelko LJ (1950) Penetration of liquid jets into a high-velocity air stream. NACA RM-E50F21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chungbuk National UniversityCheongjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations