An Analysis of the Different Flow Characteristics of a Closed Bomb Test in Cylindrical and Spherical Closed Vessels
- 5 Downloads
A zirconium/potassium perchlorate (ZPP) mixture is ignited inside cylindrical and spherical closed vessels. The performance of an explosive is measured via pressure histories. Each experiment maintains the same conditions (other than vessel shape), but the outputs indicate different pressure characteristics. The cylindrical vessel shows oscillating pressure values, while the spherical vessel exhibits dampened pressure values. A 2-D numerical simulation and a 0-D performance analysis are thus utilized to reveal the physical phenomena inside the vessels and select the adequate vessel shape for the test. It is determined that the different pressure characteristics occur due to the different pressure shock wave movements generated by the rapid ZPP combustion. The cylindrical vessel retains its shock longer than the spherical vessel because the cylinder has a constant cross-sectional area. The spherical vessel has a narrow–wide–narrow shape, which consistently reflects the side of the shock wave along with its propagation. A flow visualization inside the thick closed vessel provides elementary understandings on the closed bomb test that helps to interpret the combustion characteristics.
KeywordsClosed bomb test (CBT) Pyrotechnics Reactive two-phase flow
This work was supported by the Agency for Defense Development under the ‘A precise energy release for the pyrotechnic mechanical device’ program.
- 1.Homan BE, Juhasz AA, XLCB: A new closed-bomb data acquisition and reduction program. Army research laboratory public release document, ARL-TR-2491Google Scholar
- 2.Konecny P, Krizan Z (2008) Determination of Black Powder Burning Rate. Adv Milit Technol 3(2):11–18Google Scholar
- 5.Bradley HH, Mechanical design requirements for closed combustion bomb,” Naval Weapons Center Public Release Document, NWC-TM-3037Google Scholar
- 8.Yang LC (2011) “Effects of fuel particle size and impurity on solid-to-solid pyrotechnic reaction rate”, 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
- 9.Poulsen BL, Rink KK (2011) “Modeling the energy release and burn rate characteristics of ZPP based initiators”, 49th AIAA aerospace science meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition. Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
- 10.CEA, chemical equilibrium application, 1994, NASA reference publication 1311Google Scholar
- 11.Rosin P, Rammler E (1933) The laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J Inst Fuel 7:29–36Google Scholar
- 15.White FM (2006) Viscous fluid flow, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar