Advertisement

Architecture options estimate for the near-medium-haul aircraft control system by the reliability, mass and power consumption criteria

  • S. E. Postnikov
  • A. A. Trofimov
  • S. V. Baikov
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Current trends in increasing fuel efficiency and improving aircrafts flight characteristics place engineers before task of reducing the weight of onboard systems and decreasing power consumption with preserving required degree of reliability. In part of aircraft control system, the main stream is the actuators usage with power supply. In this article, three architecture options of the power part of the aircraft control system with different electrification levels are considered. The considered options of the power part of the control system are estimated by three criteria: reliability, mass, power consumption. The selected criteria allow for the preliminary conclusion about the prospects one or another aircraft control system architecture.

Keywords

The control system architecture The control system reliability The control system mass The power consumption of the control system The aircraft actuator Reservation Electro-hydrostatic actuators 

References

  1. 1.
    Voronovich SG, Kargopolchev VD, Kutahov VV, Aviapanorama (2009) 4, pp 14–17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alekseenkov AS (2014) Improvement of dynamic properties and study of working processes of the aircraft steering hydraulic actuator with combined speed control with increasing external load. Doctor’s thesis, Moscow, MAI, p 150Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ermakov SA, Karev VI, Mitrichenko AN, Selivanov AM, Sukhorukov RV (2010) Control actuation systems of civil aircraft. New developments and reliability. Aerosp MAI J 17(3):18–29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xue L (2009) Actuation technology for flight control system on civil aircraft. Master’s thesis. Cranfield, Cranfield University, p 164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maré J-C (2016) Aerospace actuators 1: needs, reliability and hydraulic power solutions. ISTE Ltd, London, p 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maré J-C (2017) Aerospace actuators 2: signal-by-wire and power-by-wire. ISTE Ltd, London, p 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baikov SV, Bliznova TB, Obolenskiy YG (2012) Development trends for architecture of control system’s executive section in construction of modern aircraft. Nauchnyj vestnik GosNII GA 2(313):15–23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meng F (2010) Actuation system design with electrically powered actuators. Master’s thesis. Cranfield, Cranfield University, p 138Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCullough KR (2011) Design and characterization of a dual electro-hydrostatic actuator. Master’s thesis. Hamilton, McMaster University, p 170Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shcumilov IS (2009) Sistemy upravleniya rulyami samoletov (Aircraft control systems), Moscow, MGTU im. N. E. Baumana, p 469Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aleshcin BS, Bajenov SG, Didenko YI, Sheluhin YF (2013) Sistemy distantsionnogo upravleniya magistral’nykh samoletov (Fly-by-wire control system for long-haul aircraft). Nauka, Moscow, p 223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations