Indian Phytopathology

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 183–189 | Cite as

Cataloguing variability in Phytophthora infestans with respect to ploidy status and response of different polyploids to temperature

  • Sanjeev SharmaEmail author
  • Anupama Guleria
  • Mehi Lal
  • B. P. Singh
  • S. K. Chakrabarti


Late blight, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, had been, and continues to be the most dreaded disease of potato and tomato world over. In the present study, P. infestans isolates collected from Indian hills, sub-tropical plains and plateau regions were analyzed for their ploidy status and results revealed that P. infestans population in the country are polyploid consisting of diploids, triploids and tetraploids. Diploids were predominant in all the locations while tetraploids were altogether missing from north-eastern and southern hills while in plateau only diploids were observed. Response of different polyploids to temperature was studied and results revealed that mycelial growth was observed in the range of 15–28 °C with the optimum temperatures being 15–20 °C. Indirect germination was highest at 4 °C, with germination decreasing drastically with increase in temperature while direct germination was fairly good in all polyploids in the range of 8–22 °C, though differed significantly, thereafter it declined drastically. Temperature differentially affected incubation period (IP), latent period (LP), lesion area (LA) and sporulation. In general, IP decreased with increase in temperature and shortest IP for all polyploids occurred at 24 °C. Lesion area increased with increase in temperature in all polyploids up to 20 °C and thereafter it decreased. At 28 °C, diploids and triploids could not establish infection while tetraploids could do after 72 h. No sporulation was observed for any of the polyploid at 10 and 28 °C while diploids and triploids did not sporulate at 24 °C. In general diploids had highest sporulation than tetraploids. Diploids were predominant at all locations and were more aggressive that could be one of the reasons for their dominance in the country.


Aggressiveness Late blight pathogen Potato temperature effect 



The work is the outcome of an Outreach project on “Phytophthora, Fusarium and Ralstonia Diseases of Horticultural and Field Crops (PhytoFuRa)” funded by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.


  1. Al-Kherb SM, Fininsa C, Shattock RC, Shaw DS (1995) The inheritance of virulence of Phytophthora infestans to potato. Plant Pathol 44:552–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryant TR, Howard KL (1969) Meiosis in oomycetes: I. A microspectrophotometric analysis of nuclear DNA in Saprolegnia terrestris. Am J Bot 56:1075–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chycoski CL, Punja ZK (1996) Characterization of population of Phytophthora infestans from potato in British Columbia and other regions of Canada during 1993 to 1995. Plant Dis 80:579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke DEL, Cano LM, Raffaele S, Brain RA, Cooke LR, Etherington GJ, Deahl KL, Farrer RA, Gilroy EM, Goss EM, Grunwald NJ, Hein I, MacLean D, McNicol JW, Randall E, Oliva RF, Pel MA, Shaw DS, Squires JN, Taylor MC, Vleeshouwers VGAA, Birch PRJ, Lees AK, Kamoun S (2012) Genome analyses of an aggressive and invasive lineage of the Irish potato famine pathogen. PLoS Pathog 8(10):1002940. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crosier W (1934) Studies in the biology of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA, Memoir 155Google Scholar
  6. Daggett SS, Knighton JE, Therrien CD (1995) Polyploidy among isolates of Phytophthora infestans from eastern Germany. Phytopathology 143:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danies G, Small IM, Myers K, Childers R, Fry WE (2013) Phenotypic characterization of recent clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans in the United States. Plant Dis 97:873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fry WE, Drenth A, Spielman LJ, Mantel BC, Davidse LC, Goodwin SB (1991) Population genetic structure of Phytophthora infestans in the Netherlands. Phytopathology 81:1330–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta H (2000) Studies on late blight disease of potatoes and tomatoes caused by Phytophthora infestans. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Botany, JN College, Baraut, Meerut (UP), India, p 180Google Scholar
  10. Hamed BH, Gisi U (2013) Generation of pathogenic F1 progeny from crosses of Phytophthora infestans isolates differeing in ploidy. Plant Pathol 62:708–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard KL, Bryant TR (1971) Meiosis in the oomycetes: II. A microspectrophotometric analysis of nuclear DNA in Apodachlya brachynema. Mycologia 63:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kato M, Mizubuti ES, Goodwin SB, Fry WE (1997) Sensitivity to protectant fungicides and pathogenic fitness of clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans in the United States. Phytopathology 87:973–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Klarfeld S, Rubin A, Cohen Y (2009) Pathogenic fitness of oosporic progeny isolates of Phytophthora infestans on late blight resistant tomato lines. Plant Dis 93:947–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maziero JMN, Maffia LA, Mizubuti ESG (2009) Effects of temperature on events in the infection cycle of two clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans causing late blight on tomato and potato in Brazil. Plant Dis 93:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mizubuti ESG, Fry WE (1998) Temperature effects on developmental stages of isolates from three clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 88:837–843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma S, Singh BP, Sharma S, Patil VU (2016) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Phytophthora infestans population of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol 69(4):391–395Google Scholar
  17. Sansome E (1977) Polyploidy and induced gametangial formation in British isolates of Phytophthora infestans. J Gen Microbiol 99:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sansome E, Brasier CM (1975) Diploidy and chromosomal structural hybridity in Phytophthora infestans. Nature 214:344–345Google Scholar
  19. Tani S, Yatzkan E, Judelson HS (2004) Multiple pathways regulate the induction of genes during zoosporogenesis in Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17:330–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Therrien CD, Ritch DL, Davidse LC, Jespers Ad BK, Spielman LJ (1989) Nuclear DNA content, mating type, and metalaxyl sensitivity of eighty-three isolates of Phytophthora infestans from the Netherlands. Mycol Res 92:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Therrien CD, Ritch DL, Sujkowski LS, Tooley PW, Spielman LJ, Daggett SS, Sim JH (1993) Phytophthora infestans in Poland from 1987–1989. Nuclear DNA content, mating type distribution and response to metalaxyl. J Phytopathol 139:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tooley PW, Therrien CD (1987) Cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content of 23 Mexican and 18 non-Mexican isolates of Phytophthora infestans. Exp Mycol 11:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tooley PW, Fry WE, Villarreal Gonzalez MJ (1985) Isozyme characterization of sexual and asexual Phytophthora infestans populations. J Hered 76:431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tooley PW, Therrien CD (1991) Variation in ploidy in Phytophthora infestans. In: Lucas JA, Shattock RC, Shaw DS, Cooke R (eds) Phytophthora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–217Google Scholar
  25. Tooley PW, Therrien CD, Ritch DL (1989) Mating type, race composition, nuclear DNA content, and isozyme analysis of Peruvian isolates of Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 79:478–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whittaker SL, Shattock RC, Shaw DS (1991) Variation in DNA content of nuclei of Phytophthora infestans as measured by a microfluorimetric method using the fluorochrome DAPI. Mycol Res 95:602–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoon HS, Hackett JD, Pinto G, Bhattacharya D (2002) The single, ancient origin of chromist plastids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15507–15512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zadoks JC, Schein RD (1979) Epidemiology and plant disease management. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Phytopathological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjeev Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anupama Guleria
    • 1
  • Mehi Lal
    • 2
  • B. P. Singh
    • 1
  • S. K. Chakrabarti
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-Central Potato Research InstituteShimlaIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Regional StationModipuramIndia

Personalised recommendations