Analysis of Gas Content in Oil-Filled Equipment with Spark Discharges and Discharges with High Energy Density

  • Oleksii Serhiiovych KulykEmail author
  • Oleg Volodymyrovych Shutenko
Regular Paper


The paper presents the results of the analysis of the gas content in 444 units of oil-filled equipment, which revealed spark and creeping discharges, as well as discharges with high energy density. The values of gas ratios and the percentage of gases in oil samples are calculated. Nomograms and graphical areas of defects are constructed. The description of the most characteristic damages in the equipment is given. Diagnostics of the equipment using the Duval triangle is carried out. The results obtained make it possible to increase the reliability of defect type recognition based on the results of the analysis of gases dissolved in oil.


Dissolved gas analysis Diagnostics of faults Oil-filled equipment Spark discharges Creeping discharges Discharges with high energy density Gas ratio Gas percentage Graphic areas Duval triangle 



  1. 1.
    G. Behzadi, H. Golnabi, Monitoring temperature variation of reactance capacitance of water using a cylindrical cell probe. J. Appl. Sci. 9, 752–758 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Behzadi, H. Golnabi, Investigation of conductivity effects on capacitance measurements of water liquids using a cylindrical capacitive sensor. J. Appl. Sci. 10, 261–268 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Behzadi, H. Golnabi, Comparison of invasive and non-invasive cylindrical capacitive sensors for electrical measurements of different water solutions and mixtures. Sens. Actuators A 167(2), 359–366 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Behzadi, L. Fekri, H. Golnabi, Effect of the reactance term on the charge/discharge electrical measurements using cylindrical capacitive probes. J. Appl. Sci. 11, 3293–3300 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.-F. Hsu, Y.-H. Chang, Y.-C. Cheng, S.-L. Lie, C.-C. Lin, C.-H. Hsu, C.-W. Chang, W.-S. Jan, C.-H. Chou, Smart maintenance system for three-phase power transformer via fuzzy logic approach. Int J Circuits Syst Signal Process 5(4), 370–381 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.R. Hussein, M.M. Yaacob, M.F. Othman, An expert system for diagnosing faults and assessing the quality insulation oil of power transformer depending on the DGA method. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 78(2), 278–285 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.R. Ahmed, M.A. Geliel, and A. Khalil, Power transformer fault diagnosis using fuzzy logic technique based on dissolved gas analysis, in 21 st Mediterranean Conference on Control&Automation (MED), Platanias-Chania, Crete, Greece, 25–28 June 2013, pp. 584–589Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.A. Muhamad, S.A.M. Ali, LabVIEW with fuzzy logic controller simulation panel for condition monitoring of oil and dry type transformer. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Inte. J. Electr. Comput. Energet. Electron. Commun. Eng. 2(8), 1685–1691 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U. Roland, O. Omorogiuwa, Artificial neural network approach to distribution transformers maintenance. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Technol. 1(4), 62–70 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chin-Pao Hung, Mang-Hui Wang, Diagnosis of incipient faults in power transformers using CMAC neural network approach. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 71, 235–244 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEC Publication 60599, Interpretation of the Analysis of Gases in Transformer and Other Oil Med Electrical Equipment in Service (IEC, Geneva, 2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Dornenburg, W. Strittmater, Monitoring oil cooling transformers by gas analysis. Brown Boveri Rev. 61, 238–274 (1974)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.R. Rogers, IEEE and IEC codes to interpret incipient faults in transformers, using gas in oil analysis. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 13(5), 349–354 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SOU-N PE 46.501: Diagnosis oil-filled transformer equipment based on the results of chromatographic analysis of free gas with gas relay selected, i gases dissolved in insulating oil, Kyiv (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    RD 153-34.0-46.302-00: Guidelines for the diagnosis of developing faults in transformer equipment based on the results of the chromatographic analysis of gases dissolved in oil, Moscow (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IEEE Guide for the Interpretation of Gases Generated in Oil-Immersed Transformers, IEEE StandARCd C57.104-2008 (2009 Feb)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Mollmann, B. Pahlavanpour, New guidelines for interpretation of dissolved gas analysis in oil-filled transformers. Electra 186, 31–51 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O. Shutenko, I. Jakovenko, Analysis of gas content in high voltage equipment with partial discharges, in 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems (IEPS), 10–14 September 2018, Kharkiv, Ukraine, pp. 347–352.
  19. 19.
    O. Shutenko, Faults diagnostics of high-voltage equipment based on the analysis of the dynamics of changing of the content of gases. Energetika 64(1), 11–22 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O. Shutenko, I. Jakovenko, Fault diagnosis of power transformer using method of graphic images, in 2017 IEEE International Young Scientists Forum on Applied Physics and Engineering (YSF-2017), 17–20 October 2017, Lviv, Ukraine, pp. 66–69 (2017).
  21. 21.
    O. Shutenko, Analysis of the content of gases in oil-filled equipment with electrical defects. Probl. Energ. Reg. 3(38), 1–16 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Lakehal, F. Tachi, Bayesian duval triangle method for fault prediction and assessment of oil immersed transformers. Measur. Control 50(4), 103–109 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.I. Khalyasmaa, D.I. Bliznyuk, A.M. Verkhozin, K.V. Ovchinnikov, The problems of dissolved in oil gases analysis results’ interpretation in information analytical systems, in 2016 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 743–747Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michel Duval, A review of faults detectable by gas-in-oil analysis in transformers. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 18(3), 8–173 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanika Shrivastava, Ashish Choubey, A novel association rule mining with IEC ratio based dissolved gas analysis for fault diagnosis of power transformers. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res. 2(2), 34–44 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lutao Liu, Zujun Ding, Modeling analysis of power transformer fault diagnosis based on improved relevance vector machine. Math. Probl. Eng. 636374, 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. Londo, R. Bualoti, M. Çelo, N. Hobdari, Hybrid dissolved gas-in-oil analysis methods. J. Power Energy Eng. 3(6), 10–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Al-Janabi, S. Rawat, A. Patel, I. Al-Shourbaji, Design and evaluation of a hybrid system for detection and prediction of faults in electrical transformers. Electr Power Energy Syst 67, 324–335 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Li, L. Wang, B. Song, S. Jian, Improved fuzzy C-means clustering for transformer fault diagnosis using dissolved gas analysis data. Energies 11(9), 1–17 (2018). Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M.M.B. Yaacob, A.R. Hussein, M.F.B. Othman, DGA Method-based ANFIS expert system for diagnosing faults and assessing quality of power transformer insulation oil. Mod. Appl. Sci. 10(1), 13–22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    O. Shutenko, Analysis of graphical samples of gases constructed for chromatographic analysis of gases dissolved in oil for high-voltage power transformers with various types of defects. Bulletin of the National Technical University “KhPI”. Collection of scientific papers. Series: Power reliability and energy efficiency, Kharkiv: NTU “KhPI”, No. 31(1253), pp. 97–121 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A.-P. Chen, C.-C. Lin, Fuzzy approaches for fault diagnosis of transformers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118, 139–151 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Z. Abidin, M.H. Shukri, K. Abdul Rashid, et al., Design of a fault diagnostic engine for power transformer using data mining. Project Report. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Skudai, Johor (Unpublished).
  34. 34.
    R.N. Afiqah, I. Musirin, D. Johari, M.M. Othman, T.K.A. Rahman, Z. Othman, Fuzzy logic application in DGA methods to classify fault type in power transformer, in International Conference on Electric Power Systems, High voltages, Electric machines, International Conference on Remote Sensing–Proceedings (2010), pp. 83–88Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    I.A. Abulmageed Hameed, S.R. Farag, Monitoring power transformer using fuzzy logic. J. Eng. Dev. 17(6), 146–163 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Liu, K. Zheng, H. Zhang, D. Peng, A comparative research on power transformer fault diagnosis based on several artificial neural networks. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 18, 7501–7508 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sherif Ghoneim, Kamel A. Shoush, Diagnostic tool for transformer fault detection based on dissolved gas analysis. Adv. Electr. Eng. Syst. 1(3), 152–156 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Z.B. Sahri, R.B. Yusof, Support vector machine-based fault diagnosis of power transformer using k nearest-neighbor imputed DGA dataset. J. Comput. Commun. 2, 22–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    H.A. Illias, X.R. Chai, A.H. Abu Bakar, H. Mokhlis, Transformer incipient fault prediction using combined artificial neural network and various particle swarm optimisation techniques. PLOS ONE 45, 50 (2015). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of «Electric Power Transmission»National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»LiubotynUkraine
  2. 2.Department of «Electric Power Transmission»National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»KharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations