Advertisement

The Role of National Media in Adult Literacy and Numeracy Policy: a Case Study from Australia

  • Keiko YasukawaEmail author
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In 2013, the OECD released its findings from the Survey of Adult Skills (SAS) which assessed adults’ skills in literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving in technology-rich environments in 22 countries. OECD initiatives like SAS and PISA have been the subject of critical policy studies, particularly in relation to their influence on national policymaking. National media as actors in these policy contexts have been the focus of some of these policy studies. Using a methodology informed by actor network theory (ANT), this study examines the Australian media’s responses to the release of the country’s SAS results, whilst making historical and international comparisons to uncover factors that mobilise the media to become a policy actor.

Keywords

Education policy Media as policy actors Adult numeracy and literacy International skills assessments 

Résumé

En 2013, l’OCDE publiait les résultats de son Enquête internationale sur l’alphabétisation des adultes (EIAA), qui évaluait les compétences de base des adultes en termes de lecture, d’écriture, de calcul et de résolution de problèmes en milieu hautement technologique, dans 22 pays. Certaines initiatives de l’OCDE telles que l’IIAA et l’étude PISA ont fait l’objet de plusieurs études critiques, particulièrement pour ce qui a trait à leur influence sur l’élaboration des politiques nationales, et une partie de ces études ont été centrées sur les médias nationaux en tant qu’acteurs dans les contextes politiques. Utilisant une méthodologie éclairée par la théorie des réseaux d’acteurs (TRA), la présente étude analyse les réactions des médias australiens suite à la publication des résultats de l’EIAA au pays, et établit des comparaisons historiques et internationales visant à mettre en évidence les facteurs qui mobilisent les médias à devenir des acteurs politiques.

Notes

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Adult literacy and life skills survey, summary results, Australia. Canberra, Australia: ABS.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013a, 15 February). Older Australians have lower levels of literacy and numeracy (Media release). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbyReleaseDate/1C9DEC10F0169A32CA257BFE00150C37?OpenDocument
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013b, 15 February). Young women lag behind young men on numeracy skills, but perform well on literacy (Media release). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbyReleaseDate/0E0314CD24010332CA257BFE001FA351?OpenDocument
  4. Australian Council for Education Research. (2013). International study reveals serious adult literacy and numeracy problems (Media release). Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/about-us/media/media-releases/international-study-reveals-serious-adult-literacy-and-numeracy-problems Google Scholar
  5. Battersby, E. (2013, 23 October). Could be that girls just wanna do sums. The Observer (Gladstone), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. Barwell, R., & Abtahi, Y. (2015). Morality and news media representations of mathematics education. In S. Mukhopadhyay & B. Greer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 298–311). Portland, OR: Portland State University.Google Scholar
  7. Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 83–103). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chorney, S., Ng, O-L, & Pimm, D.(2016). A tale of two more metaphors: Storylines about mathematics education in Canadian national media. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4),402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodd, T. (2013a, 10 October). We lift our game in latest OECD report. Australian Financial Review, p. 14).Google Scholar
  10. Dodd, T. (2013b, 14 October). Data point: High-level employment increases. Australian Financial Review, p. 24.Google Scholar
  11. Dodd, T. (2013c, 21 October). Data point: Literacy linked to wage levels. Australian Financial Review, p. 24.Google Scholar
  12. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 61(6), 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorur, R., & Wu, M. (2015). Learning too far? PISA, policy and Australia’s ‘top five’ ambitions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 647–664.Google Scholar
  14. Grek, S. (2014). OECD as a site of coproduction: European education governance and the new politics of ‘policy mobilization’. Critical Policy Studies, 8(3), 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hadfield, S. (2013, 16 February). We literally can’t read. Herald Sun, p. 16.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, M. (2011). Unruly practices: What a sociology of translations can offer to educational policy analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, M. (2012). Literacy and the politics of representation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, M., Maddox, B., & Addey, C. (Eds.). (2015). Literacy as numbers: Researching the Politics and Practices of International Literary Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hosking, W. (2013) Australians lack basic literacy, numeracy skills. (2013, 11 October). Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/
  20. Jablonka, E. (2015). The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Law, J., & Hassard, (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Organisation of Economic Development and Cooperation. (2013a). OECD Skills outlook: First results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/oecd-skills-outlook-2013_9789264204256-en
  24. Organisation of Economic Development and Cooperation. (2013b). Australia – Country Note – Survey of Adult Skills: First results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Country%20note%20-%20Australia_final.pdf Google Scholar
  25. Rodney, S., Rouleau, A., & Sinclair, N. (2016) A tale of two metaphors: Storylines about mathematics education in Canadian national media. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teens outperform greys on the two Ls (2013, 21 February). The Australian. Google Scholar
  27. Tsatsaroni, A., & Evans, J. (2014). Adult numeracy and the totally pedagogised society: PIAAC and other international surveys in the context of global educational policy on lifelong learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Special Issue: Social theory and research in mathematics education, 87(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
  28. Walker, J. (2009). The inclusion and construction of the worthy citizen through lifelong learning: A focus on the OECD. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker, J., & Rubenson, K. (2014). The media construction of an adult literacy agenda in Canada. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(1), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yasukawa, K., & Black, S. (2016). Policy making at a distance. In K. Yasukawa & S. Black (Eds.), Beyond economic interests: Critical perspectives on adult literacy and numeracy in a globalised world (pp. 19–39). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yasukawa, K., Hamilton, M., & Evans, J. (2017). A comparative analysis of national media responses to the OECD Survey of Adult Skills: policy making from the global to the local?. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ontario Institute for Educat. Studies 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations