Threshold concepts for Australian university outdoor education programs: findings from a Delphi research study
In Australia, when a person wants to work in the outdoor education or recreation field, they can follow a number of different pathways to gain the required knowledge, skills and experience. Typically, this involves the completion of a formal program with either a training organisation or a university, depending on the qualification sought. Programs delivered by training organisations typically use a national training package to define the specific competencies (knowledge and skills) and the curriculum and outcomes of these programs are clearly defined, and qualifications are usually transferable around the country. Outdoor education programs delivered by universities in Australia, however, have no such clarity. This paper describes a research study that used the Delphi research method to consult with academics working in university outdoor education programs across Australia. The research set out to establish a set of threshold concepts that articulate what a student who completes at least a major in outdoor education knows and is able to do. Over two rounds of consultation the six authors of this paper formed the Delphi facilitation team, which solicited input and feedback from an expert panel. Nineteen different university academics participated in the research and produced seven threshold concepts, which are shared in this paper to encourage discussion and invite feedback from a wider range of stakeholders. More research is required to ascertain the efficacy of these threshold concepts in describing what graduates of university outdoor education programs know and can do.
KeywordsThreshold concepts Outdoor education pathways Outdoor leadership training Delphi research
We would like to acknowledge the input and support of the academics from the Australian Tertiary Outdoor Education Network who contributed as expert panel members.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework, (2nd ed.) Retrieved from https://www.aqf.edu.au/aqf-second-edition-january-2013
- Barrett, M. J., Harmin, M., Maracle, B., Patterson, M., Thomson, C., Flowers, M., & Bors, K. (2016). Shifting relations with the more-than-human: Six threshold concepts for transformative sustainability learning. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1121378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education., 1, 5–22.Google Scholar
- Boyes, M. (2004). The maintenance of quality in the preparation of outdoor education teachers. New Zealand Journal of Outdoor Education: Ko Tane Mahuta Pupuke, 1(4), 82–98.Google Scholar
- Department of Education and Training. (2015). Training package details SIS10 - Sport, Fitness and Recreation Training Package. Retrieved from https://training.gov.au/Training/Details/SIS10#.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Galloway, S. (2002). Theoretical cognitive differences in expert and novice outdoor leader decision making: Implications for training and development. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
- Gray, T., & Mitten, D. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave international handbook of women and outdoor learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hills, D., & Thomas, G. J. (2019). Digital technology and outdoor experiential learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1604244.
- Larkin, I. (2003). Developing a code of ethics for Australian outdoor education, in Relevance: Making it Happen (pp. 115–120), Proceedings of the 13th National Outdoor Education Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
- Martin, B., Bruenig, M., Wagstaff, M., & Goldenberg, M. (2017). Outdoor leadership: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice ten years on (pp. 412–424). Oxford: OCSLD Retrieved on September 24, 2016 from https://www.dkit.ie/ga/system/files/Threshold_Concepts__and_Troublesome_Knowledge_by_Professor_Ray_Land_0.pdf.Google Scholar
- Morgan, P. K. (2015). Pausing at the threshold. (Paper 1258). Faculty Publications. http://digitalcommons.hope.edu/faculty_publications/1258
- O’Donnell, R. (2010). A critique of the threshold concepts hypothesis and an application in economics (Working Paper No. 164). Retrieved from http://www.finance.uts.edu.au/research/wpapers/wp164.pdf
- Outdoor Education Australia. (2017). Code of Ethics, accessed 19/2/2019 from https://outdooreducationaustralia.org.au/about/code-of-ethics/
- Payne, P., & Wattchow, B. (2009). Phenomenological deconstruction, slow pedagogy and the corporeal turn in wild environmental/outdoor education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 15–32.Google Scholar
- Priest, S., & Gass, M. A. (2017). Effective leadership in adventure programming (3rd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Rosengren, N., & Peterson, J. (1989). Heritage values and the geological and geomorphological significance of the Australian alpine zone. The Scientific Significance of the Australian Alps. The Australian Alps National Parks Liaison Committee/Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 187–204.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena.Google Scholar
- Sellars, M. (2017). Reflective practice for teachers. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
- SkillsIQ. (2015). SIS10: Sport, Fitness, and Recreation Training Package (Release 3.1). Retrieved from https://training.gov.au/Training/Details/SIS10
- Wattchow, B., & Brown, M. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar