Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 293–305 | Cite as

Wild pedagogies and wilding pedagogies: teacher-student-nature centredness and the challenges for teaching

  • John QuayEmail author
  • Aage Jensen
Original paper


The notion of wild pedagogies entreats teachers to act – to wild pedagogies – by acknowledging that more than a singular will characterizes pedagogical situations. Wilding pedagogies requires going beyond ideas of teacher-centred and student-centred pedagogies to encompass nature-centred pedagogies: recognizing the self-will of wider nature. In attempting this wilding, we suggest teachers can learn from the the previous movement from teacher-centred pedagogy to what Larry Cuban describes as teacher-centred progressivism; a hybrid pedagogy that emerged as a result of compromises between teacher-centred and student-centred pedagogies. Attempting to incorporate nature-centred pedagogies presents difficulties and opportunities for educational responses and we highlight a way forward that might be achievable via Dewey’s notion of education through occupations. Occupations are important to Dewey’s theory of experience, drawing together purpose and meaning into occupational wholes. This, we argue, presents challenges for teaching.


Wild pedagogies Wilding pedagogies Nature-centred Occupations Outdoor education Dewey Næss 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Blenkinsop, S., & Morse, M. (2017). Saying yes to life: The search for the rebel teacher. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future (pp. 49–61). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuban, L. (1983). How did teachers teach, 1890-1980. Theory Into Practice, 22(3), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880–1990 (1st ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cuban, L. (2007). Hugging the middle: Teaching in an era of testing and accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(1) Retrieved from Accessed 25 Sept 2018.
  6. Dewey, J. (1902a). The educational situation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1902b). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1930). How much freedom in schools? New Republic, 63(9), 204–206.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  12. Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Morse, M., & Jensen, A. (2018). Wild pedagogies: Six initial touchstones for early childhood environmental educators. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. Advance online publication.
  13. Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, P. (1999). Critical outdoor education and nature as a friend. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure Programming. State College: Venture.Google Scholar
  15. Næss, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Næss, A., & Jickling, B. (2000). Deep ecology and education: A conversation with Arne Næss. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 48–62.Google Scholar
  17. Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Payne, P. (2002). On the construction, deconstruction and reconstruction of experience in 'critical' outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 6(2), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pedersen Gurholt, K. (2008). Norwegian friluftsliv and ideals of becoming an ‘educated man’. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 8(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quay, J. (2013). Education, experience and existence: Engaging Dewey, Peirce and Heidegger. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quay, J. (2015). Understanding life in school: From academic classroom to outdoor education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quay, J. (2016). Outdoor education and school curriculum distinctiveness: More than content, more than process. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 19(2), 42–50.Google Scholar
  23. Quay, J., & Seaman, J. (2013). John Dewey and education outdoors: Making sense of the 'educational situation' through more than a century of progressive reforms. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Skeat, W. W. (1888). An etymological dictionary of the English language. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vest, J. H. C. (1985). Will-of-the-land: Wilderness among primal indo-Europeans. Environmental Review: ER, 9(4), 323–329.Google Scholar
  26. Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears?: A conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English Forest schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Outdoor Education Australia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Kwong Lee Dow BuildingUniversity of MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.LevangerNorway

Personalised recommendations