Advertisement

English Teaching & Learning

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 125–146 | Cite as

Using Pitch and Length Information to Assess Speech Prosody: a Parallel Approach

  • Hang ChanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Recent studies on pronunciation instruction underscore the effectiveness of using pitch variation contours to enhance language learners’ awareness of English intonation. Little is known of the situation in language production: Do learners adjust their pitch levels or lengthen or shorten a sound in order to vary their prosody? The current study posits that both pitch and length variations are involved in encoding speech prosody; it purports to quantify their relative importance by using Hincks’s (2005) Pitch Variation Quotient (PVQ) and a self-created length variation quotient (LVQ). The methods section introduces four quantitative methods, using data from the participants’ verbal speech as well as the training material (a song) to compare pitch and length behaviours. Results from three of the four methods support that the learners, after undergoing a period of training (a singing class), improved their length variation but not their pitch variation over a reading task. The fourth method (a mixed between-within ANOVA) also confirms the learners’ general prosodic improvement, but the test raises curious points about the complex relationship between pitch and length that are worth further consideration by pronunciation assessors. Overall, this study provides initial evidence of the importance of length variation for assessing prosodic change.

Keywords

Pitch Length Variation quotients Prosodic assessment 

以聲調和音長來評估說話的韻律:平行進路研究

摘要

發音教學的最新研究表明, 運用聲調變化輪廓 (Pitch Variation Contours) 能有效增加語言學習 者對英語語調 (intonation) 的意識。然而, 我們對聲調變化在發音上的狀況卻不太了解 : 語言 學習者究竟是否透過聲調高低, 或聲音的長短來改變其說話的韻律 (prosody)? 本項研究指出, 聲調高低和聲音長短兩者同時釐定出說話的韻律, 並試圖運用 Hincks (2005) 的聲調變化商數 (Pitch Variation Quotient (PVQ)), 以及一個自身制作的音長變化商數 (Length Variation Quotient (LVQ)), 來比較兩者的重要性。就此, 本文的方法欄目裏測試了四項計量方法; 它們透過運用 學習者的說話, 以及培訓材料 (一首歌), 來比較聲調和音長行為。當中三項計量方法表明, 在被培訓一段時間後 (一個歌唱課), 學習者於一個閱讀任務中, 能改善其音長變化, 卻不能 改善聲調變化。至於第四項方法, 以一種混合中間/裡面的變異數分析 (a between-within ANOVA), 雖然證實了學習者在韻律上的整體改善, 卻就其中引發對聲調和音長之間的種種複 雜關係, 仍待日後發音專家的繼續探索。大體而言, 本研究就音長變化對說話韻律的重要性, 提供了初步的證據。

關鍵詞

聲調 音長 變化商數 韻律評估 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the anonmyous reviewers for their feedback, which has greatly improved the clarify of the paper. He also wishes to thank Mr. Roger Lo and other student helpers at HKBU for their assistance in the implementation of the treatment.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

42321_2018_17_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby, M., & Maidment, J. (2005). Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM). (2009). Grade 5 singing examination. Retrieved from http://us.abrsm.org/en/our-exams/singing-exams/. Accessed 24 Apr 2016.
  4. 4.
    Audacity Team. (2016). Audio editor and recorder [computer programme]. (Version 2.1.1). Retrieved from http://audacityteam.org/. Accessed 24 Apr 2016.
  5. 5.
    Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Riverton, NJ: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer programme]. (Version 6.0.21). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 2 Aug 2016.
  7. 7.
    Brazil, D. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, J. D. (2012). New ways in teaching connected speech. Alexandria: TESOL International Association.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (Vol. 2). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, P. K. W. (1997). Using songs in the English language classroom. In P. Falvey & P. Kennedy (Eds.), Learning language through literature: a sourcebook for teachers of English in Hong Kong (pp. 107–115). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, H. (2018). A method of prosodic assessment: insights from a singing workshop. Cogent Education, 5(1).  https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1461047.
  13. 13.
    Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 57(4), 1468.  https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279.
  14. 14.
    Christiner, M., & Reiterer, S. M. (2013). Song and speech: examining the link between singing talent and speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00874.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: from theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chun, D. M., Hardison, D. M., & Pennington, M. C. (2008). Technologies for prosody in context: Past and future of L2 research and practice. In J. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 323–346). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coulthard, M. (1992). The significance of intonation in discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 35–49). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deterding, D. (2001). Letter to the editor: the measurement of rhythm: a comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 217.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferreira, F. (2005). Prosody. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Retrieved from https://login.lib-ezproxy.hkbu.edu.hk/login?qurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.credoreference.com%2Fcontent%2Fentry%2Fwileycs%2Fprosody%2F0.
  23. 23.
    Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–768.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126–152.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fry, D. B. (1979). The physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gan, L., & Chong, S. (1998). The rhythm of language: fostering oral and listening skills in Singapore pre-school children through an integrated music and language arts program. Early Child Development and Care, 144, 39–45.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gingold, H., & Abravanel, E. (1987). Music as a mnemonic: the effects of good- and bad-music settings on verbatim recall of short passages by young children. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 7(1), 25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094188.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Good, A. J., Russo, F. A., & Sullivan, J. (2015). The efficacy of singing in foreign-language learning. Psychology of Music, 43(5), 627–640.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614528833.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goodwin, J. (2014). Teaching pronunciation. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 136–152). Boston: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hincks, R. (2005). Measures and perceptions of liveliness in student oral presentation speech: a proposal for an automatic feedback mechanism. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 575–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.04.002. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hincks, R. (2015). Technology and learning pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 505–519). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hincks, R., & Edlund, J. (2009). Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 32–50.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). A survey of intonation systems. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). (1999). HKDSE English Language: Recommended texts for the school-based assessment component. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/SBA/HKDSE/Eng-SBA_Recommended_Texts-091008.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2016.
  36. 36.
    Iwasaki, B., Rasinski, T., Yildirim, K., & Zimmerman, B. S. (2013). Let’s bring back the magic of song for teaching reading. Reading Teacher, 67(2), 137–141.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    James, E. F. (1976). The acquisition of prosodic features of speech using a speech visualizer. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 14(3), 227–243.  https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1976.14.3.227.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English pronunciation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim, S., Broersma, M., & Cho, T. (2012). The use of prosodic cues in learning new words in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 415–444.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263112000137.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ladefoged, P. (2003). Phonetic data analysis: an introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and consonants: an introduction to the sounds of languages (2nd ed.). Oxford, Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2011). A course in phonetics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lehmann, J. A. M., & Seufert, T. (2018). Can music foster learning—effects of different text modalities on learning and information retrieval. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02305.
  45. 45.
    Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Levis, J. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 37–63.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Levis, J., & Pickering, L. (2004). Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 32(4), 505–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Low, E. L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43(4), 377–401.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ludke, K. M., Ferreira, F., & Overy, K. (2014). Singing can facilitate foreign language learning. Memory Cognition, 42(1), 41.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0342-5.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Morrill, T. (2011). Acoustic correlates of stress in English adjective-noun compounds. Language and Speech, 55(2), 167–201.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911417251.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (6th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Paquette, K. R., & Rieg, S. A. (2008). Using music to support the literacy development of young English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 227–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0277-9.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English language teaching: an international approach. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Racette, A., & Peretz, I. (2007). Learning lyrics: to sing or not to sing? Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 242–253.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rainey, D. W., & Larsen, J. D. (2002). The effect of familiar melodies on initial learning and long-term memory for unconnected text. Music Perception, 20(2), 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.173.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rogerson-Revell, P. (2011). English phonology and pronunciation teaching. New York, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schoepp, K. (2001). Reasons for using songs in the ESL/EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(2). retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Schoepp-Songs.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  58. 58.
    Schön, D., & François, C. (2011). Musical expertise and statistical learning of musical and linguistic structures. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 167.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00167.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Setter, J. (2006). Speech rhythm in world Englishes: the case of Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 763–782.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shen, C. (2009). Using English songs: an enjoyable and effective approach to ELT. English Language Teaching, 2(1), retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/341/305. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  61. 61.
    Tompkins, G. E. (2013). Language arts: patterns of practice (8th ed.). London, Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Trask, R. L. (1996). A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wallace, W. T. (1994). Memory for music: effect of melody on recall of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1471–1485.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1471.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yu, V. Y., & Andruski, J. E. (2010). A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(4), 323–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9142-2.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang, Y., Nissen, S. L., & Francis, A. L. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498–4513.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Taiwan Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education StudiesHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations