Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 256–265 | Cite as

Hidden flow structures in compressible mixing layer and a quantitative analysis of entrainment based on Lagrangian method

  • Geng Liang
  • Bin Yu
  • Bin ZhangEmail author
  • Hui Xu
  • Hong Liu
Special Column for Symposium on Vortex Identification Methods and Applications (Guest Editor Yu-Ning Zhang)


The compressible mixing layer is an important physical model to describe the mixing enhancement in scramjet combustors. The downstream coherent structures are normally regarded as the main contribution of the entrainment in the compressible mixing layer. In this study, three cases of the compressible mixing layer of convective Mach number Ma = 0.4 are numerically simulated through the Lagrangian coherent structure (LCS) method to show that the entrainment process in the compressible mixing layer is closely related to the upstream hidden structures termed as the “entrainment formation structures”. The entrainment formation structures consist of a series of inclined control bodies that are identical and nested to one another upstream the compressible mixing layer. In combination with the separation of the flow properties of coherent structures, the entrainment characteristics in the compressible mixing layer can be evaluated by the inclined control bodies of the upstream entrainment formation structures in the upper and lower fluids. Furthermore, with the quantitative analysis of the spatial position of the upstream coherent structure, the entrainment ratio is determined. The study of the entrainment formation and its characteristics helps the effective control of the entrainment performance in the compressible mixing layer.

Key words

Compressible mixing layer Lagrangian coherent structure (LCS) finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Gutmark E. J., Schadow K. C., Yu K. H. Mixing enhancement in supersonic free shear flows [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 27: 375–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Urzay J. Supersonic combustion in air–breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 50: 593–627.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dimotakis P. E. Turbulent free shear layer mixing and combustion [J]. High Speed Flight Propulsion Systems, 1991, 137: 265–340.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brown G. L., Roshko A. On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1974, 64(4): 775–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Slessor M. D., Zhuang M., Dimotakis P. E. Turbulent shear–layer mixing: growth–rate compressibility scaling [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 414: 35–45.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lu G., Lele S. K. Inviscid instability of a skewed compressible mixing layer [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 249: 441–463.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Brown G. L. The entrainment and large structure in turbulent mixing layers [C]. 5th Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics, Adelaide, Australia, 1974, 352–359.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Qiu X., Zhang D. X., Lu Z. M. et al. Turbulent mixing and evolution in a stably stratified flow with a temperature step [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(1): 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Reinaud J., Joly L., Chassaing P. The baroclinic secondary instability of the two–dimensional shear layer [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(10): 2489–2505.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Soteriou M. C., Ghoniem A. F. Effects of the free–stream density ratio on free and forced spatially developing shear layers [J]. Physics of Fluids, 1995, 7(8): 2036–2051.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Howland C., Taylor J., Caulfield C. Testing linear marginal stability in stratified shear layers [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 839: R4.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Haller G., Yuan G. Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two–dimensional turbulence [J]. Physica D, 2000, 147: 352–370.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Peacock T., Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures: the hidden skeleton of fluid flows [J]. Physics Today, 2013, 66(2): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Shadden S. C., DabiriJ. O., Marsden J. E. Lagrangian analysis of fluid transport in empirical vortex ring flows [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18(4): 047105.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Green M. A., Rowley C. W., Haller G. Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three–dimensional turbulence [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 572: 111–120.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ho C. M., Huerre P. Perturbed free shear lyaers [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1984, 16: 365–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Guo G., Liu H., Zhang B. Development of a temporal evolution model for aero–optical effects caused by vortices in the supersonic mixing layer [J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(10): 2708–2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Wang Z., Yu B., Chen H. et al. Scaling vortex breakdown mechanism based on viscous effect in shock cylindrical bubble interaction [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(12): 126103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Clemens N. T., Mungal M. G. Large–scale structure and entrainment in the supersonic mixing layer [J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 284: 171–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 47: 137–162.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Cheng H. Y., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. 3–D Lagrangianbased investigations of the time–dependent cloud cavitating flows around a Clark–Y hydrofoil with special emphasis on shedding process analysis [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(1): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Shadden S. C., Lekien F., Marsden J. E. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finitetime Lyapunov exponents in two–dimensional aperiodic flows [J]. Physica D, 2005, 212: 271–304.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Perez–Munuzuri V. Mixing and clustering in compressible chaotic stirred flows [J]. Physical Review E, 2014, 89(2): 022917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Perez–Munuzuri V. Clustering of inertial particles in compressible chaotic flows [J]. Physical Review E, 2015, 91(5): 052906.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Chian A. C. L., Rempel E. L., Aulanier G. et al. Detection of coherent structures in turbulent photospheric flows [J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2014, 786(1): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Onu K., Huhn F., Haller G. LCS Tool: A computational platform for Lagrangian coherent structures [J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2015, 7: 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Guo G. M., Liu H., Zhang B. Numerical study on evolution characteristics of vortices in supersonic mixing layers [J]. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, 2016, 48(2): 133–140.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Haller G. A variational theory of hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures [J]. Physica D, 2012, 240(7): 574–598.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geng Liang
    • 1
  • Bin Yu
    • 1
  • Bin Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hui Xu
    • 1
  • Hong Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations