Advertisement

Experimental study of the impact of the floating-vegetation island on mean and turbulence structure

  • Wang-yang Yu (于汪洋)Email author
  • Chun-bo Jiang (江春波)
  • Ying Shi (史莹)
  • Qi Zhou (周琦)
  • Jian Liu (刘健)
  • Qi Zhang (张琦)
Article

Abstract

Floating-vegetation island (FVI) is widely used in river restoration projects for it can help decontaminate the pollutants. A physical experiment is conducted to explore the flow regime near FVI aiming to better understand the role FVI serve in river systems. According to the observed data reflecting the mean and turbulent flow characteristics, the flow field has been subdivided into four regions: the incoming flow adjustment region, initial adjustment region, shear layer developing region and fully developed region. The changing process of the velocity profile is discussed that a “J” shape in the incoming flow adjustment region evolves to a “S” similar shape in the shear layer developing and fully developed region. The velocity in the interface between the canopy and the flow in the fully developed region obeys the rule of a mixing layer theory. Based on the experiment data, a three-layer model in estimating the vertical velocity distribution in the fully developed region is deduced and performs well with laboratory findings in current work and historical research

Key words

Floating-vegetation island flow adjustment velocity profile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Nahlik A. M., Mitsch W. J. Tropical treatment wetlands dominated by free–floating macrophytes for water quality improvement in Costa Rica [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006. 28(3): p. 246–257.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Downing–Kunz M., Stacey M. Flow–induced forces on free–floating macrophytes [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2011. 671(1): p. 121–135.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Nichols, P. et al. Performance Evaluation of a Floating Treatment Wetland in an Urban Catchment [J]. Water, 2016, 8(6).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Keddy P. A. Wetland ecology: principles and conservation [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Stewart F. M. et al., Floating islands as an alternative to constructed wetlands for treatment of excess nutrients from agricultural and municipal wastes–results of laboratory–scale tests [J]. Land Contamination & Reclamation, 2008. 16(1): 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Borne K. E. Floating treatment wetland influences on the fate and removal performance of phosphorus in stormwater retention ponds [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014. 69: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Nikora V. Hydrodynamics of Aquatic Ecosystems: An Interface between Ecology, Biomechanics and Environmental Fluid Mechanics [J]. River Research and Applications, 2010, 26(4): 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Tanner C. C. et al. Floatin. Treatment Wetlands: A new tool for nutrient management in lakes and waterways [J]. Methods, 2011, 2008(2011).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lin, Y.F., et al., Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundwater in constructed wetlands [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2002. 119(3): 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Toft J. D. et al. The effects of introduced water hyacinth on habitat structure, invertebrate assemblages, and fish diets [J]. Estuaries, 2003. 26(3): 746–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zong L. J., Nepf H. Vortex development behind a finite porous obstruction in a channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012. 691: p. 368–391.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Chen Z. B. et al. The wake structure behind a porous obstruction and its implications for deposition near a finite patch of emergent vegetation [J]. Water Resources Research, 2012. 48.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ghisalberti M., Nepf H. M. Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2002. 107(C2).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Huai W. X. et al. Velocity distribution for open channel flows with suspended vegetation [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2012. 49: 56–61.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kundu P., Cohen I. Fluid mechanics 4 th ed. 2008, Academic Press San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ho C.–M., Huerre P. Perturbed free shear layers [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1984, 16(1): 365–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Fujita I., Muste M., Kruger A. Large–scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1998, 36(3): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Meinhart C. D., Prasad A. K., Adrian R. J. A parallel digital processor system for particle image velocimetry [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1993. 4(5): 619–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Rominger J. T., Nepf H. M. Flow adjustment and interior flow associated with a rectangular porous obstruction [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011. 680: 636–659.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Huai W. X., Li C. G. Longitudinal dispersion in open channel flow with suspended canopies [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016. 74(3): 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Zhao F., Huai W. X., Li D. Numerical modeling of open channel flow with suspended canopy [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2017. 105: 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wang-yang Yu (于汪洋)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chun-bo Jiang (江春波)
    • 1
  • Ying Shi (史莹)
    • 1
  • Qi Zhou (周琦)
    • 1
  • Jian Liu (刘健)
    • 1
  • Qi Zhang (张琦)
    • 1
  1. 1.Stake Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations