Multi-objective optimization of the kinematic parameters of fish-like swimming using a genetic algorithm method
- 28 Downloads
This paper investigates the kinematic optimization of fish-like swimming. First, an experiment was performed to detect the motion of the fish tail foil of a fish robot. Next, the kinematic swimming model was verified experimentally using an image processing method. The model includes two rotational motions: caudal foil motion and foil-pitching motion. The kinematic model allows us to evaluate the influence of motion trajectory in the optimization process. To optimize the propulsive efficiency and thrust, a multi-objective genetic algorithm was employed to handle with kinematic, hydrodynamic, and propulsion models. The results show that the caudal length has a significant effect on the performance of the flapping foil in fish-like swimming, and its influence on the motion trajectory may increase the propulsive efficiency to as high as 98% in ideal conditions. The maximum thrust coefficient can also reach approximately 3 in ideal conditions.
Key wordsFish-like swimming fish robot hydrodynamics optimization genetic algorithm
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was supported by the International Research and Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (NRF-2017K1A3A1A30084513) and partial support was also obtained from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Grant Nos. 2011-0030013, 2018R1A2B2007117).
- Fish F. Comparative kinematics and hydrodynamics of odontocete cetaceans: morphological and ecological correlates with swimming performance [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1998, 201(20): 2867–77.Google Scholar
- Politis G. K., Tsarsitalidis V. Simulating biomimetic (flapping foil) flows for comprehension, reverse engineering and design [C]. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Trondheim, Norway, 2009.Google Scholar
- Esfahani J. A., Barati E., Karbasian H. R. Comparative investigations in the effect of angle of attack profile on hydrodynamic performance of bio-inspired foil, (corrected) [J]. 2013, 10(2): 10.Google Scholar
- Tuncer I. H., Walz R., Platzer M. F. A computational study on the dynamic stall of a flapping airfoil [C]. 16th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 1998.Google Scholar
- Delaurier J. D. An aerodynamic model for flapping wing flight [J]. Aeronautical Journal, 1993, 97(964): 125–30.Google Scholar
- Hoerner S. F. Fluid dynamic drag: Practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance [M]. Second Edition, 1965.Google Scholar
- Lian Y., Shyy W. Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number plunging airfoil under gusty environment [C]. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2007.Google Scholar