Experimental Investigation of Combined Vibrations for a Hydrofoil-rod System at Low Reynold Numbers

  • Ren-feng Wang (王人凤)
  • Ke Chen (陈科)
  • Francis Nobelesse
  • Yun-xiang You (尤云祥)Email author
  • Wei Li (李巍)


A hydrodynamic tunnel experimental investigation and analysis of vibration characteristics for a hydrofoil in a transient regime is considered. Tests are performed for NACA 0017 models with a non-uniform section at an angle of attack AOA = 5º and Reynolds numbers up to Re = 7.0 × 106. This study is related to a project design of experiments in a complex facility that involves several parameters. The analysis focuses on the vibrations of a hydrofoil for different values of the bracing stiffness kh, the torsional stiffness kα, and the locations of the elastic axis ā and of the center of gravity xα. The structural bracing response is investigated via measurements of the displacement of the free tip section of the hydrofoil using a three-axis acceleration sensor, and the torsional response of the structure is analyzed via measurements of displacements with single-axis acceleration sensors. The hydrofoil is made of reinforced plastics without flexibility, and elastic functions are provided by a spring support mechanism combined with a torsional structure. The study shows that an increase of the velocity V results in different behaviors of the bracing and torsional amplitudes. Another notable result of the study is that the emergence of transition occurs simultaneously with additional peaks and changes of vibration amplitudes.

Key words

Vibrations lifting bodies transition laminar separation bubbles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Caster M. The structure and behavior of separation bubbles [R], Revised Aero Report, 1967, 1181.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rojratsirikul P., Genc M. S., Wang Z., et al. Flow–induced vibrations of low aspect ratio rectangular membrane wings [J], Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(8): 1296–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lian Y., Shyy W., Viieru D., et al. Membrane wing aerodynamics for micro air vehicles [J], Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2003, 39(6): 425–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Lian Y., Shyy W. Laminar–turbulent transition of a low reynolds number rigid or flexible airfoil [J], AIAA journal, 2007, 45(7): 1501–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hu H., Yang Z. An experimental study of the laminar flow separation on a low–reynolds–number airfoil [J], Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(5): 051101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Rist U., and Maucher U. Investigations of time–growing instabilities in laminar separation bubbles [J], European Journal of Mechanics–B/Fluids, 2002, 21(5): 495–509.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gostelow J. P., McMullan W. A., Walker G J. Streamwise vorticity, laminar separation and transition in flows over turbomachinery blades [C]. 49th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting, AIAA, 2011, volume 285.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ravi S., Watkins S., Watmuff J., et al. Transient loads occurring over a thin airfoil subjected to large–scale freestream turbulence [J], AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(6): 1473–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nati A., Kat R. D., Scarano F., et al. Dynamic pitching effect on a laminar separation bubble [J], Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56(9): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Samson A., Sarkar S. An experimental investigation of a laminar separation bubble on the leading–edge of a modelled aerofoil for different reynolds numbers [J], Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2015, 0954406215594826.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    DeMauro E. P., DellOrso H., Zaremski S., et al. Control of laminar separation bubble on naca 0009 airfoil using electroactive polymers [J], AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(8): 2270–2279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Garcia E, Yu P, Durgesh V, et al. Experimental Study of Thin and Thick Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers [C]. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016: 0854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lambert A, Yarusevych S V. Analyzing Vortex Dynamics in the Laminar Separation Bubble vis Surface Pressure Measurements[C]. 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2015: 2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lambert A. Vortex Dynamics within the Laminar Separation Bubble over a NACA 0018 Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers [D]. University of Waterloo, 2015.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Herr R W. A study of flutter at low mass ratios with possible application to hydrofoils [R]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ducoin A, Astolfi J A, Gobert M L. An experimental study of boundary–layer transition induced vibrations on a hydrofoil [J], Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2012, 32: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ren-feng Wang (王人凤)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ke Chen (陈科)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francis Nobelesse
    • 2
  • Yun-xiang You (尤云祥)
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Wei Li (李巍)
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ocean EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea ExplorationShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations