Numerical simulation of transient turbulent cavitating flows with special emphasis on shock wave dynamics considering the water/vapor compressibility
- 52 Downloads
The objective of this paper is to investigate the compressible turbulent cavitating flows with special emphasis on shock wave dynamics, with the water/vapor compressibility taken into account. The simulations are performed by solving the compressible, multiphase unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with Saito cavitation model and SST-SAS turbulence model. The compressibility of both the pure water and vapor is considered by employment of the Tait equation of state for water and ideal gas equation of state for vapor. Results are presented for a 3-D NACA66 hydrofoil fixed at α = 6° and σ =1.25 in partial cavitating flows. Cavity collapse induced shock wave formation and propagation, which is closely related to the compressibility characteristics of cavitating flows, are well predicted. Good performance has been obtained for both the cavity evolution process and cavitation induced pressure signals, especially the cavity collapse induced shock wave emission and its interaction with the attached cavity sheet. The pressure peaks in microseconds accompanying the shock wave are captured. The typical quasi-periodic sheet/cloud cavitation evolution is characterized by the following four stages: (1) the growth of the attached cavity sheet, (2) development of re-entrant flow and attached cavity sheet breakup, (3) attached cavity sheet rolling up and cavity cloud shedding, and (4) cloud cavity collapse, shock wave emission and propagation. The cloud cavity collapse induced shock wave dynamics is supposed to be the major origin of cavitation instabilities.
Key wordsTurbulent cavitating flows compressibility re-entrant flow shock wave cavitation instability OpenFOAM
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the Graduate Technological Innovation Project of Beijing Institute of Technology (Grant No. 2017CX10017).
- Reisman G. E. Dynamics, acoustics and control of cloud cavitation on hydrofoils [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Pasadena, USA: California Institute of Technology, 1997.Google Scholar
- Soyama H., Kato H., Oba R. Cavitation observations of severely erosive vortex cavitation arising in a centrifugal pump [C]. Proceedings of the third IMechE International Conference on Cavitation, Cambridge, UK,1992.Google Scholar
- Wallis G. One-dimensional two-phase flow [M]. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
- Brennen C. E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Franc J. P., Michel J. M. Fundamentals of cavitation [M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar
- Mørch K. A. On the collapse of cavity cluster in flow cavitation [C]. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Cavitation and Inhomogenieties in Under-water Acoustics, Gottingen, Germany, 1979, 95–100.Google Scholar
- Mørch K. A. Cavity cluster dynamics and cavitation erosion [C]. Proceedings of ASME Cavitation and Polyphase Flow Forum, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1981.Google Scholar
- Core R. H. Underwater explosion [M]. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
- Semenov E., Kosterin S. Results of studying the speed of sound in moving gas-liquid systems [J]. Teploenergetika, 1964, 11 (6): 46–51.Google Scholar
- Henry R. E., Grolmes M., Fauske H. K. Pressure-pulse propagation in two-phase one- and two-component mixtures [R]. Technical Report Argonne and Image Library, 1971.Google Scholar
- Meier G. E. A., Thompson P. A. Adiabatic waves in liquid-vapor systems [M]. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1990.Google Scholar
- Schmidt E., Grigull U. Properties of water and stream in SI-Units [M]. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1981.Google Scholar
- Egorov Y., Menter F. R. Development and application of SST-SAS turbulence model in the DESIBER project (Peng S. H., Haase W. Advances in hybrid RANS-LES modeling. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multi-disciplinary design) [M]. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2008, 97: 261–270.Google Scholar
- Sagaut P. Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows [M]. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
- Eddington R. B. Investigation of supersonic phenomena in a two-phase (liquid-gas) tunnel [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Pasadena, USA: California Institute of Technology, 1967Google Scholar