Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 319–327 | Cite as

Motion Characteristics of the Appendages of Mole Crickets during Burrowing

  • Yan ZhangEmail author
  • Jiafeng Cao
  • Qi Wang
  • Pengfei Wang
  • Yueying Zhu
  • Junxia Zhang
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Mole crickets, Gryllotalpa orientalis, have a pair of fully specialized forelegs for burrowing and employ an efficient underground excavating pattern, which provides excellent biological example for design of bionic underground excavation equipment. In this study, the excavating pattern and kinematic features of mole crickets were obtained by using high-speed motion capture system and employing a transparent hydrogel as the analogue for soil. The two-dimensional motion characteristics of the forelegs of mole crickets during burrowing were captured and analyzed. The results show that the forelegs of the mole cricket employ a unique excavating pattern, which consists of foreword digging and horizontal expansion. We label this pattern a digging-expanding mode. An excavating cycle includes the digging and expanding motion of the forelegs, rotation caused by the midlegs and hindlegs, and forward thrust by the hindlegs. The excavating motion of the left and right forelegs is alternately carried out. This study can inspire the design of bionic tunnelling mechanisms and underground excavation equipment.

Keywords

bionics experimental biology mole cricket burrowing forelegs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51405341 and 51505332), and the Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (Grant Nos. 15JCYBJC19300, 15JCQNJC06900, 14ZCDSY00010 and 16JCZDJC35900).

References

  1. [1]
    Endo C. The underground life of the oriental mole cricket: An analysis of burrow morphology. Journal of Zoology, 2007, 273, 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bailey D L, Held D W, Kalra A, Twarakavi N, Arriaga F. Biopores from mole crickets (Scapteriscus, spp.) increase soil hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rates. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 94, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zhang Y, Huang H, Liu X, Ren L Q. Kinematics of terrestrial locomotion in mole cricket Gryllotalpa orientalis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2011, 8, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zhang Y, Zhang J X, Ren L Q. The terrestrial locomotion of a mole cricket with foreleg amputation. Science China E, 2015, 58, 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Quillin K J. Ontogenetic scaling of burrowing forces in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203, 2757–2770.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Manton S M. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms — Part 2. General introduction to the locomotory mechanisms of the arthropoda. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 42, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Maladen R D, Ding Y, Li C, Goldman D I. Undulatory swimming in sand: Subsurface locomotion of the Sandfish lizard. Science, 2009, 325, 314–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Maladen R D, Ding Y, Umbanhowar P B, Kamor A, Goldman D I. Mechanical models of sandfish locomotion reveal principles of high performance subsurface sand-swimming. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2011, 8, 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Thomas H G, Bateman P W, Scantlebury M, Bennett N C. Seasonal effects on digging activity and burrow architecture in the Cape dune mole-rat, Bathyergus suillus (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Zoologica Africana, 2012, 47, 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Davies K C, Jarvis J U M. The burrow systems and burrowing dynamics of the mole-rats Bathyergus suillus and Cryptomys hottentotus in the fynbos of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Journal of Zoology, 2015, 209, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Scott R G, Richardson R C. Realities of biologically inspired design with a subterranean digging robot example. Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ji W F, Chen D H, Jia H L, Tong J. Experimental investigation into soil-cutting performance of the claws of mole rat (Scaptochirus moschatus). Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S166–S171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Espinoza D N, Santamarina J C. Ant tunneling-a granular media perspective. Granular Matter, 2010, 12, 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Tschinkel W R. The nest architecture of the ant, Camponotus socius. Journal of Insect Science, 2005, 5, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sudd J H. The excavation of soil by ants. Ethology, 1969, 26, 257–276.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sudd J H. Specific patterns of excavation in isolated ants. Insectes Sociaux, 1970, 17, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sowig P. Brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): The effect of soil moisture on time budget, nest structure, and reproductive success. Ecography, 1996, 19, 254–258.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Anderson J R, Loomis E C. Exotic dung beetles in pasture and range land ecosystems. California Agriculture, 1978, 32, 31–32.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ljungberg H. Notes on north European Onthophagus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Entomologisk Tidskrift, 2002, 123, 35–49.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Tvedten S L. The Best Control II - An Encyclopedia of Integrated Pest Management. Institute of Pest Management, [2018-12-13], https://doi.org/www.learnipm.com/enroll.htm
  23. [23]
    Dorgan K M, Arwade S R, Jumars P A. Burrowing in marine muds by crack propagation: Kinematics and forces. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 4198–4212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Gidmark N J, Strother J A, Horton J M, Summers A P, Brainerd E L. Locomotory transition from water to sand and its effects on undulatory kinematics in sand lances (Ammodytidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 657–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Li M, Chen D H, Zhang S J, Tong J. Biomimeitc design of a stubble-cutting disc using finite element analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Watson J T, Ritzmann R E. Leg kinematics and muscle activity during treadmill running in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis, I. Slow running. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1998, 182, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Kram R. Inexpensive load carrying by rhinoceros beetles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1996, 199, 609–612.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiafeng Cao
    • 1
  • Qi Wang
    • 1
  • Pengfei Wang
    • 1
  • Yueying Zhu
    • 1
  • Junxia Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Integrated Design and On-line Monitoring for Light Industry & Food Machinery and Equipment, College of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin University of Science & TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations