Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 673–681 | Cite as

Preparation and Endothelialization of Multi-level Vessel-like Network in Enzymated Gelatin Scaffolds

  • Guirong Dong
  • Qin Lian
  • Laixia Yang
  • Wei Mao
  • Shiyang Liu
  • Chao Xu
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Loss of function of large tissues is an urgent clinical problem. Although the artificial microfluidic network fabricated in large tissue- engineered constructs has great promise, it is still difficult to develop an efficient vessel-like design to meet the requirements of the biomimetic vascular network for tissue engineering applications. In this study, we used a facile approach to fabricate a branched and multi-level vessel-like network in a large muscle scaffolds by combining stereolithography (SL) technology and enzymatic crosslinking mechanism. The morphology of microchannel cross-sections was characterized using micro-computed tomography. The square cross-sections were gradually changed to a seamless circular microfluidic network, which is similar to the natural blood vessel. In the different micro-channels, the velocity greatly affected the attachment and spread of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell (HUVEC)-Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). Our study demonstrated that the branched and multi-level microchannel network simulates biomimetic microenvironments to promote endothelialization. The gelatin scaffolds in the circular vessel-like networks will likely support myoblast and surrounding tissue for clinical use.

Keywords

large-size scaffolds vascular network enzymatically gelatin hydrogel endothelialization muscle tissue engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51375371) and the High-Tech Projects of China (Grant Nos. 2015AA020303 and 2015AA042503).

References

  1. [1]
    Hurd S, Bhati N, Walker A, Kasukonis B, Wolchok J C. Development of a biological scaffold engineered using the extracellular matrix secreted by skeletal muscle cells. Biomaterials, 2015, 49, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Valentin J E, Freytes D O, Grasman J M, Pesyna C, Freund J, Gilbert T W, Badylak S F. Oxygen diffusivity of biologic and synthetic scaffold materials for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2009, 91, 1010–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mandru M, Ionescu C, Chirita M. Modelling mechanical properties in native and biomimetically formed vascular grafts. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cokelet G R, Soave R, Pugh G, Rathbun L. Fabrication of in vitro microvascular blood flow systems by photolithography. Microvascular Research, 1993, 46, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    He J K, Chen R M, Lu Y J, Zhan L, Liu Y X, Jin Z M. Fabrication of circular microfluidic network in enzymatically- crosslinked gelatin hydrogel. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications, 2016, 59, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Choi J S, Piao Y, Seo T S. Fabrication of a circular PDMS microchannel for constructing a three-dimensional endothelial cell layer. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 36, 1871–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Choi J S, Piao Y, Seo T S. Circumferential alignment of vascular smooth muscle cells in a circular microfluidic channel. Biomaterials, 2014, 35, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Huang Z C, Li X, Martinsgreen M M, Liu Y X. Microfabrication of cylindrical microfluidic channel networks for microvascular research. Biomedical Microdevices, 2012, 14, 873–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wong C C, Agarwal A, Balasubramanian N, Kwong D L. Fabrication of self-sealed circular nano/microfluidic channels in glass substrates. Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, 135304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jana S, Leung M, Chang J L, Zhang M Q. Effect of nanoand micro-scale topological features on alignment of muscle cells and commitment of myogenic differentiation. Biofabrication, 2014, 6, 035012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chen S W, Nakamoto T, Kawazoe N, Chen G P. Engineering multi-layered skeletal muscle tissue by using 3D microgrooved collagen scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2015, 73, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hosseini V, Kollmannsberger P, Ahadian S, Ostrovidov S, Kaji H, Vogel V, Khademhosseini A. Fiber-assisted molding (FAM) of surfaces with tunable curvature to guide cell alignment and complex tissue architecture. Small, 2014, 10, 4851–4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fiddes L K, Raz N, Srigunapalan S, Tumarkan E, Simmons C A, Wheeler A R, Kumacheva E. A circular cross-section PDMS microfluidics system for replication of cardiovascular flow conditions. Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 3459–3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kolesky D B, Truby R L, Gladman A S, Busbee T A, Homan K A, Lewis J A. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Advanced materials, 2014, 26, 3124–3130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kubis H P, Scheibe R J, Decker B, Hufendiek K, Hanke N, Gros G, Meissner J D. Primary skeletal muscle cells cultured on gelatin bead microcarriers develop structural and biochemical features characteristic of adult skeletal muscle. Cell Biology International, 2016, 40, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Baniasadi H, Mashayekhan S, Fadaoddini S, Haghirsharifzamini Y. Design, fabrication and characterization of oxidized alginate-gelatin hydrogels for muscle tissue engineering applications. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2016, 31, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hajiabbas M, Mashayekhan S, Nazaripouya A, Naji M, Hunkeler D, Zeleti S R, Sharifiaghdas F. Chitosan-gelatin sheets as scaffolds for muscle tissue engineering. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 2015, 43, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dong G R, Lian Q, Yang L X, Mao W, Liu S Y, Xu C. Design and fabrication of vascular network for muscle tissue engineering. Advances in Engineering Research, 2016, 75, 613–621.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Murray C D. The physiological principle of minimum work: I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1926, 12, 207–214.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zamir M. Optimality principles in arterial branching. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1976, 62, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kroll M H, Hellums J D, Mcintire L V, Schafer A I, Moake J L. Platelets and shear stress. Blood, 1996, 88, 1525–1541.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Lowe G D O. Virchow’s triad revisited: Abnormal flow. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb, 2003, 33, 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Hoganson D M, Pryor H I, Spool I D, Burns O H, Gilmore J R, Vacanti J P. Principles of biomimetic vascular network design applied to a tissue-engineered liver scaffold. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2010, 16, 1469–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Camp J P, Shuler S M L. Fabrication of a multiple-diameter branched network of microvascular channels with semicircular cross-sections using xenon difluoride etching. Biomedical Microdevices, 2008, 10, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Huh D, Matthews B D, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Hsin H Y, Ingber D E. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science, 2010, 328, 1662–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Shah G, Costello B J. Soft tissue regeneration incorporating 3-dimensional biomimetic scaffolds. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 2017, 29, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Badhe R V, Bijukumar D, Chejara D R, Mabrouk M, Choonara Y E, Kumar P, du Toit L C, Kondiah P P D, Pillay V. A composite chitosan-gelatin bi-layered, biomimetic macroporous scaffold for blood vessel tissue engineering. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 157, 1215–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mansouri N, Bagheri S. The influence of topography on tissue engineering perspective. Materials Science & Engineering C–Materials for Biological Applications, 2016, 61, 906–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Visone R, Gilardi M, Marsano A, Rasponi M, Bersini S, Moretti M. Cardiac meets skeletal: What’s new in microfluidic models for muscle tissue engineering. Molecules, 2016, 21, 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Jeong K Y, Ji S L, Paik D H, Jung W K, Choi S W. Fabrication of cell-penetrable microfibrous matrices with a highly porous structure using a simple fluidic device for tissue engineering. Materials Letters, 2016, 168, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Agarwal P, Choi J K, Huang H S, Zhao S T, Dumbleton J, Li J R, He X M. A biomimetic core-shell platform for miniaturized 3D cell and tissue engineering. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 2015, 32, 809–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Ren L, Qian Z H, Ren L Q. Biomechanics of musculoskeletal system and its biomimetic implications: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Ostrovidov S, Ahadian S, Ramon-Azcon J, Hosseini V, Fujie T, Parthiban S P, Shiku H, Matsue T, Kaji H, Ramalingam M, Bae H, Khademhosseini A. Three-dimensional co-culture of C2C12/PC12 cells improves skeletal muscle tissue formation and function. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2017, 11, 582–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Elsayed Y, Lekakou C, Labeed F, Tomlins P. Fabrication and characterisation of biomimetic, electrospun gelatin fibre scaffolds for tunica media-equivalent, tissue engineered vascular grafts. Materials Science & Engineering C–Materials for Biological Applications, 2016, 61, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Williams C, Xie A W, Yamato M, Okano T, Wong J Y. Stacking of aligned cell sheets for layer-by-layer control of complex tissue structure. Biomaterials, 2011, 32, 5625–5632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Syed H, Unnikrishnan V U, Olcmen S. Characteristics of time-varying intracranial pressure on blood flow through cerebral artery: A fluid-structure interaction approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H, 2016, 230, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Hudlicka O, Brown M D. Adaptation of skeletal muscle microvasculature to increased or decreased blood flow: Role of shear stress, nitric oxide and vascular endothelial growth factor. Journal of Vascular Research, 2009, 46, 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Issa B, Moore R J, Bowtell R W, Baker P N, Johnson I R, Worthington B S, Gowland P A. Quantification of blood velocity and flow rates in the uterine vessels using echo planar imaging at 0.5 Tesla. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010. 31, 921–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guirong Dong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qin Lian
    • 3
  • Laixia Yang
    • 1
  • Wei Mao
    • 3
  • Shiyang Liu
    • 3
  • Chao Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an University of Science and TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Higher Vocational and Technical EducationXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’an Jiao Tong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations