Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 204–219 | Cite as

A Bio-inspired Soft Robotic Arm: Kinematic Modeling and Hydrodynamic Experiments

  • Zheyuan Gong
  • Jiahui Cheng
  • Xingyu Chen
  • Wenguang Sun
  • Xi Fang
  • Kainan Hu
  • Zhexin Xie
  • Tianmiao Wang
  • Li Wen
Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Soft robotics has several promising properties for aquatic applications, such as safe interaction with environments, lightweight, low cost, etc. In this paper, we proposed the kinematic modeling and hydrodynamics experiments of a soft robotic arm with 3D locomotion capacity. We developed a mathematical model that incorporates the angle correction, as well as the open-loop model-based motion control. The model could precisely predict the three-dimensional (3D) movement, and the location error is less than 5.7 mm in different attitudes. Furthermore, we performed the hydrodynamic investigations and simultaneously measured the hydrodynamic forces and the wake flows at different amplitudes (50 mm, 100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm) and frequencies (0.3 Hz, 0.4 Hz, 0.5 Hz) of the soft arm. Surprisingly, we found that the magnitudes of the hydrodynamic force (<1 N) and the torques (<0.08 N·m) of dynamically moving soft arm were tiny, which leads to negligible inertial effect for the underwater vehicle than those of the traditional rigid underwater manipulator. Finally, we demonstrated underwater picking and placing tasks of the soft manipulator by using a computer program that controls the tip attitude and velocity. This study may inspire future underwater manipulators that have properties of low-inertial, low power cost and can safely interact with the aquatic environments.

Keywords

bio-inspired soft robotic arm aquatic environment kinematics digital particle image velocimetry 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Yufei Hao and Guangyao Huang for their help on this work. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation support key projects, China, under contract numbers 61633004 and 61333016.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 5.07 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 3.84 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 4.93 MB.

42235_2018_16_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (2.5 mb)
A Bio-inspired Soft Robotic Arm: Kinematic Modeling and Hydrodynamic Experiments

References

  1. [1]
    Odhner L U, Jentoft L P, Claffee M R, Corson N, Tenzer Y, Ma R R, Buehler M, Kohout R, Howe R D, Dollar A M. A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2014, 33, 736–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Yeow C H, Baisch A T, Talbot S G, Walsh C J. Cable-driven finger exercise device with extension return springs for recreating standard therapy exercises. Journal of Medical Devices, 2014, 8, 014502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mossadegh B, Polygerinos P, Keplinger C, Wennstedt S, Shepherd R F, Gupta U, Shim J, Bertoldi K, Walsh C J, Whitesides G M. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24, 2163–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Shepherd R F, Ilievski F, Choi W, Morina S A, Stokesa A A, Mazzeoa A D, Chena X, Wanga M, Whitesides G M. Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108, 20400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Girard A, Bigué J P L, O’Brien B M, Gisby T A, Anderson I A, Plante J S´. Soft two-degree-of-freedom dielectric elastomer position sensor exhibiting linear behavior. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 20, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Shen Q, Wang T, Liang J, Wen L. Hydrodynamic performance of a biomimetic robotic swimmer actuated by ionic polymer–metal composite. Smart Materials & Structures, 2013, 22, 075035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Seok S, Onal C D, Cho K J, Wood R J, Rus D, Kim S. Meshworm: A peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 18, 1485–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Koh J S, Cho K J. Omega-shaped inchworm-inspired Crawling robot with large-index-and-pitch (LIP) SMA spring actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 18, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Rus D, Tolley M T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015, 521, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Suresh S A, Christensen D L, Hawkes E W, Cutkosky M. Surface and shape deposition manufacturing for the fabrication of a curved surface gripper. Journal of Mechanisms & Robotics, 2015, 7, 021005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Morin S A, Shepherd R F, Kwok S W, Stokes A A, Nemiroski A, Whitesides G M. Camouflage and display for soft machines. Science, 2012, 337, 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wang Y, Yang X, Chen Y, Wainwright D K, Kenaley C P, Gong Z, Liu Z, Liu H, Guan J, Wang T, Waver J C, Wood R J, Wen L. A biorobotic adhesive disc for underwater hitchhiking inspired by the remora suckerfish. Science Robotics, 2017, 2, eaan8072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bartlett N W, Tolley M T, Overvelde J T, Weaver J C, Mosadegh B, Bertoldi K, Whitesides G M, Wood R J. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science, 2015, 349, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Cho K J, Koh J S, Kim S, Chu W S, Hong Y, Ahn S H. Review of manufacturing processes for soft biomimetic robots. International Journal of Precision Engineering & Manufacturing, 2009, 10, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Stokes A A, Shepherd R F, Morin S A, Ilievski F, Whitesides G M. A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Connolly F, Polygerinos P, Walsh C J, Bertoldi K. Mechanical programming of soft actuators by varying fiber angle. Soft Robotics, 2017, 2, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Park Y L, Chen B R, Pérezarancibia N O, Young D, Stirling L, Wood R J, Goldfield E C, Nagpal R. Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle-foot rehabilitation. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9, 16007–16023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Calisti M, Giorelli M, Levy G, Mazzolai B, Hochner B, Laschi C, Dario P. An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Onal C D, Rus D. Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hao Y, Gong Z, Xie Z, Guan S, Yang X, Ren Z, Wang T, Wen L. Universal soft pneumatic robotic gripper with variable effective length. IEEE China Control Conference, Chengdu, China, 2016, 6109–6114.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hao Y, Wang T, Ren Z, Gong Z, Wang H, Yang X, Guan S, Wen L. Modeling and experiments of a soft robotic gripper in amphibious environments. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2017, 14, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1729881417707148.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Li T, Li G, Liang Y, Cheng T, Dai J, Yang X, Liu B, Zeng Z, Huang Z, Luo Y, Xie T. Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Science Advances, 2017, 3, e1602045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Park S J, Gazzola M, Park K S, Park S, Santo V D, Blevins E L, Lind J U, Campbell P H, Dauth S, Capulli A K, Pasqualini F S, Ahn S, Cho A, Yuan H, Maoz B M, Vijaykumar R, Choi J W, Deisseroth K, Lauder G V, Mahadevan L, Parker K K. Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science, 2016, 353, 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Cianchetti M, Calisti M, Margheri L, Kuba M, Laschi C. Bioinspired locomotion and grasping in water: The soft eight-arm OCTOPUS robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2015, 10, 035003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Galloway K C, Becker K P, Phillips B, Kirby J, Licht S, Tchernov D, Wood R J, Gruber D F. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3, https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2015.0019.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Yuk H, Lin S, Ma C, Takaffoli M, Fang N X, Zhao X. Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water. Nature Communications, 2017, 8, 14230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Fernandez J J, Prats M, Sanz P J, Garcia J C, Marin R, Robinson M, Ribas D, Ridao P. Grasping for the seabed: Developing a nw uderwater robot arm for shallow-water intervention. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2013, 20, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Nakashima M, Takahashi A. Clarification of unsteady fluid forces acting on limbs in swimming using an underwater robot arm. Journal of Fluid Science & Technology, 2012, 7, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Ambar R B, Sagara S, Imaike K. Experiment on a dual-arm underwater robot using resolved acceleration control method. Artificial Life & Robotics, 2015, 20, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Webster III R J, Jones B A. Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2010, 29, 1661–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Rolf M, Steil J J. Constant curvature continuum kinematics as fast approximate model for the bionic handling assistant. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2012, 3440–3446.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Jones B A, Walker I D. Kinematics for multisection continuum robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2006, 22, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Wang H, Chen W, Yu X, Deng T, Wang X, Pfeifer R. Visual servo control of cable-driven soft robotic manipulator. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 2013, 57–62.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Krishnan G. Kinematics of a new class of smart actuators for soft robots based on generalized pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, United States, 2014, 587–592.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Duriez C. Control of elastic soft robots based on real-time finite element method. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013, 3982–3987.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Giorelli M, Renda F, Calisti M, Arienti A, Ferri G, Laschi C. Neural network and Jacobian method for solving the inverse statics of a cable-driven soft arm with nonconstant curvature. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015, 31, 823–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Jiang H, Wang Z, Liu X, Chen X, Jin Y, You X, Chen X. A two-level approach for solving the inverse kinematics of an extensible soft arm considering viscoelastic behavior. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Singapore, 2017.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Gong Z, Xie Z, Yang X, Wang T, Wen L. Design, fabrication and kinematic modeling of a 3D-motion soft robotic arm. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Qingdao, China, 2016, 509–514.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Yeoh O H. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chemistry & Technology, 2012, 66, 754–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Marchese A D, Rus D. Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2015, 35, 840–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Escande C, Chettibi T, Merzouki R, Coelen V, Pathak P M. Kinematic calibration of a multisection bionic manipulator. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20, 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Hao Y, Wang T, Xie Z, Sun W, Liu Z, Fang X, Yang M and Wen L. A eutectic-alloy-infused soft actuator with sensing, tunable degrees of freedom, and stiffness properties. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2018, 28 024004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Wen L, Weaver J C, Lauder G V. Biomimetic shark skin: Design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 217, 1656–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Wen L, Weaver J C, Thornycroft P M, Lauder G V. Hydrodynamic function of biomimetic shark skin: Effect of denticle pattern and spacing. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2015, 10, 066010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheyuan Gong
    • 1
  • Jiahui Cheng
    • 1
  • Xingyu Chen
    • 2
  • Wenguang Sun
    • 1
  • Xi Fang
    • 1
  • Kainan Hu
    • 1
  • Zhexin Xie
    • 1
  • Tianmiao Wang
    • 1
  • Li Wen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of AutomationChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations