Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 15–22 | Cite as

Viral diseases: a threat for tomato cultivation in Indo-Gangetic eastern plains of India

  • Krishnan NagendranEmail author
  • Venkataravanappa Venkataravanappa
  • Neha Singh Chauhan
  • Mareppa Hussaini Kodandaram
  • Awadhesh Bahadur Rai
  • Bijendra Singh
  • Sengottaiyan Vennila
Original Article


Tomato, worldwide, is infected by several viral diseases which cause stunting, leaf curl, yellowing, mosaic, mottling, necrosis and shoe-string symptoms on plants, leaves or fruits. Among them, bud necrosis disease caused by an orthotospovirus is emerging as a major constraint to the cultivation of tomato for resource-poor farmers. In the Indo-Gangetic eastern plains, bud necrosis disease incidence on tomato ranged from 0 to 45% under field conditions during 2015 and 2016, along with other diseases such as leaf curl and mosaic caused by begomoviruses (0–35%) and tobamoviruses (0–18%) respectively. Thirty four viral infected samples collected from 11 different villages were screened for different viruses using serological and PCR-based methods. The result revealed that most samples were positive for RNA (peanut bud necrosis virus, tomato mosaic virus) and DNA (tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus, tomato leaf curl Palampur virus, tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus, tomato leaf curl Karnataka virus) viruses along with their satellites (DNA-α and DNA-β) respectively. Further, the incidence of bud necrosis correlates to the weather parameters, which demonstrate that a long dry spell leads to higher incidence of viral disease, whereas lower incidence was observed during the rainy period considering a reduced vector population.


Leaf curl Mosaic Tomato virus diseases Tospovirus BegomoviruTobamovirus 



The work was carried out under grants from the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) in the form of National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) on Real Time Pest Dynamics in Tomato.


  1. Briddon RW (2004) Diversity of DNA 1: a satellite-like molecule associated with monopartite begomovirus-DNA [beta] complexes. Virology 324:462–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briddon RW, Bull SE, Mansoor S, Amin I, Markham PG (2002) Universal primers for the PCR-mediated amplification of DNAβ: a molecule associated with some monopartite begomoviruses. Mol Biotechnol 20:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bull SE, Briddon RW, Markham PG (2003) Universal primers for the PCR-mediated amplification of DNA 1: a satellite-like molecule associated with begomovirus-DNAβ complexes. Mol Biotechnol 23:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakraborty S, Vanitharani R, Chattopadhyay B, Fauquet CM (2008) Supervirulent pseudorecombination and asymmetric synergism between genomic components of two distinct species of begomovirus associated with severe tomato leaf curl disease in India. J Gen Virol 89:818–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chowda Reddy RV, Colvin J, Muniyappa V, Seal S (2005) Diversity and distribution of begomoviruses infecting tomato in India. Arch Virol 150:845–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu FH, Chao CH, Chung MH, Chen CC, Yeh SD (2001) Completion of the genome sequence of Watermelon silver mottle virus and utilization of degenerate primers for detecting tospoviruses in five serogroups. Phytopathology 91:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DACFW (2015) Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare. In: Horticultural statistics at a glance, vol 2015. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, p 153Google Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  9. FAOSTAT, 2014. Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations. Available online Accessed on 5th May, 2017
  10. Gómez P, Sempere RN, Amari K, Gómez-Aix C, Aranda MA (2010) Epidemics of tomato torrado virus, Pepino mosaic virus and tomato chlorosis virus in tomato crops: do mixed infections contribute to torrado disease epidemiology? Ann Appl Biol 156:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Llamas-Llamas ME, Zavaleta-Mejia E, Gonzalez-Hernandez VA, Cervantes-Diaz L, Santizo-Rincon JA, Ochoa-Martinez DL (1998) Effect of temperature on symptom expression and accumulation of tomato spotted wilt virus in different host species. Plant Pathol.
  12. Nagendran K, Mohankumar S, Aravintharaj R, Balaji CG, Manoranjitham SK, Singh AK, Rai AB, Singh B, Karthikeyan G (2017) The occurrence and distribution of major viruses infecting cucurbits in Tamil Nadu state, India. Crop Prot 99:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nawaz-ul-Rehman MS, Fauquet CM (2009) Evolution of geminiviruses and their satellites. FEBS Lett 583:1825–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rojas MR, Gilbertson RL, Maxwell DP (1993) Use of degenerate primers in the polymerase chain reaction to detect whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Plant Dis 77(4):340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Venkata Ramana C, Venkata Rao P, Prasada Rao RDVJ, Kumar SS, Reddy IP, Reddy YN (2011) Genetic analysis for Peanut bud necrosis virus (PBNV) resistance in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.). In III International Symposium on Tomato Disease (914):459–463Google Scholar
  16. Venkataravanappa V, Reddy CNL, Jalali S, Krishna Reddy M (2012) Molecular characterization of distinct bipartite begomovirus infecting bhendi (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) in India. Virus Genes 44:522–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Patologia Vegetale (S.I.Pa.V.) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishnan Nagendran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Venkataravanappa Venkataravanappa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Neha Singh Chauhan
    • 1
  • Mareppa Hussaini Kodandaram
    • 1
  • Awadhesh Bahadur Rai
    • 1
  • Bijendra Singh
    • 1
  • Sengottaiyan Vennila
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Crop ProtectionICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable ResearchVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Central Horticultural Experiment Station (CHES)ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchChettalliIndia
  3. 3.ICAR- National Centre for Integrated Pest ManagementNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations