Advertisement

Characterization and structural performance of hybrid fiber-reinforced composite deck panels

  • R. GopinathEmail author
  • R. Poopathi
  • S.S. Saravanakumar
Original Research
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the experimental and analytical investigation on the behavior of hybrid fiber-reinforced composite deck made up of glass and jute fibers embedded in vinyl ester matrix. Finite element evaluation of the flexural performance of the composite decks was carried out using ANSYS, FE software. It was observed that analytical evaluation underestimates the value of deflection of deck panels 1 and 2 by 10.91% and 18.57%, respectively, when compared to the experimental results. However, the value of strain obtained by FEA is appreciably higher than that observed during the experiment. The analytical evaluation of deck panels was further extended to HYFRP and GFRP (glass fiber-reinforced polymer) decks with varied cross sections obtained by changing the location and shape of stiffeners. The specifications stipulated by Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), USA, for FRP decks were used for evaluating the performance of deck panels. The values of maximum deflection and strain experienced by the deck panels with stiffeners at the web-flange joint were found to be less than that of deck panels provided with stiffeners at the center of top flange of each cellular unit. Out of the various configurations examined, the performance of decks with V-shaped stiffeners and combination of U- and V-shaped stiffeners at top and bottom web-flange joint were found to be best with substantially lower deflection and strain.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Hybrid Fibers Deck Flexure FE analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Barkakaty BC (1976) Some structure aspects of sisal fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 20:2921–2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GC, Zeng HM (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 61(10):1437–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishak MR, Leman Z, Sapuan SM, Edeerozey AMM, Othman IS (2010) Mechanical properties of kenaf bast and core fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering vol. 11, pp.1–6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Almeida JRM, Aquino RCMP, Monteiro SN (2006) Tensile mechanical properties, morphological aspects and chemical characterization of piassava (Attalea funifera) fibers. Compos Part A 37:1473–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS (2011) Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Carbohydr Polym 86:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charlet K, Baley C, Morvan C, Jernot JP, Gomina M, Breard J (2007) Characteristics of Herme’s flax fibres as a function of their location in the stem and properties of the derived unidirectional composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 38:1912–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24(2):221–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kabir MM, Wang H, Aravinthan T, Cardona F, Lau KT (2011) Effects of natural fiber surface on composite properties: a review. EddBE2011 Proceedings pp. 94–99Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mishra S, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M, Parija S, Nayak SK, Tripathy SS (2003) Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1377–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sreekumar PA, Thomas SP, Saiter JM, Joseph K, Unnikrishnan G, Thomas SP (2009) Effect of fiber surface modification on the mechanical and water absorption characteristics of sisal/polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Compos Part A 40:1777–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8(5):313–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mwaikambo L, Ansell M (2002) Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci 84(12):2222–2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao Y, Shibata S, Fukumoto I (2006) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites reinforced with bagasse fiber before and after alkali treatments. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 37:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomes A, Matsuo T, Goda K, Ohgi J (2007) Development and effect of alkali treatment on tensile properties of curaua fiber green composites. Compos Part A 38:1811–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goda K, Sreekala MS, Gomes A, Kaji T, Ohgi J (2006) Improvement of plant based natural fibers for toughening green composites – effect of load application during mercerization of ramie fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:2213–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edeerozey AMM, Azhar AB, Akil HM, Zainal Ariffin MI (2007) Chemical modification of kenaf fibers. Mater Lett 61:2023–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yousif BF, Shalwan A, Chin CW, Ming KC (2012) Flexural properties of treated and untreated kenaf/ epoxy composites. Mater Des 40:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rout J, Mishra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK (2001) The influence of fiber treatment on the performance of coir–polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1303–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Panthapulakkal S, Sain M (2007) Injection-molded short hemp fiber/glass fiber reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites – mechanical, water absorption and thermal properties. J Appl Polym Sci 103(4):2432–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koradiya SB, Patel JP, Parsania PH (2010) The preparation and physicochemical study of glass, jute and hybrid glass–jute bisphenol-C-based epoxy resin composites. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 49(14):1445–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Joseph S, Sreekala MS, Koshy P, Thomas S (2008) Mechanical properties and water sorption behavior of phenol-formaldehyde hybrid composites reinforced with banana fiber and glass fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 109(3):1439–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alagusundaramoorthy P, Veera Sudarsana Reddy R (2008) Testing and evaluation of GFRP composite deck panels. Ocean Eng 35:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar P, Chandrashekhara K, Antonio N (2004) Structural performance of a FRP bridge deck. Constr Build Mater 18:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mallick PK (2008) Fiber reinforced Composites. CRC press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdel Ghafaar M, Mazen AA, El-Mahallawly NA (2006) Application of the rule of mixtures and halpin-tsai equations to woven fabric reinforced epoxy composites. J Engrg Sci Assiut Univ 34:227–236Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chawla KK (1987) Composite Mater Sci Eng. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goangseup Z, Byeong MK, Yoon KH, Young HL (2008) An experimental study on static behavior of a GFRP bridge deck filled with a polyurethane foam. Compos Struct 82:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity College of Engineering, Anna UniversityTindivanamIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kamaraj College of Engineering and TechnologyVirudhunagarIndia

Personalised recommendations