Advertisement

Asian Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 371–381 | Cite as

Transient Galerkin finite volume solution of dynamic stress intensity factors

  • Saeed Reza Sabbagh-Yazdi
  • Arwin FarhoudEmail author
  • Masoud Zabihi-Samani
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Transient Galerkin finite volume method (GFVM) is developed to solve time-dependent problems and analysis of the dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIFs) for cracked problem. An interesting feature of the developed method is its matrix free operations; therefore, it obviously reduces the computation workloads for dynamic cases with small time marching. The two-point displacement extrapolation method is used for calculating the stress intensity factors (SIFs). To show the ability of this method, the structural problem, such as a beam under dynamic load, is considered as the first case study. The computed transient deflections are used for evaluating the accuracy of the GFVM in comparison with the results of the explicit finite element method (explicit-FEM) and meshless method solvers. A comparison of the CPU time consumption of the GFVM and explicit-FEM solvers shows that the GFVM entails lesser time consumption than the explicit-FEM, without reducing the accuracy of the results. In the second case study, the SIFs are computed for plate with inner crack under constant loading. For the third and fourth case study, the ability of the proposed GFVM solver to cope with DSIFs for a plate with an edge crack and L-shape plate with an inclined crack under dynamic load were tested. The comparison indicates that the GFVM not only provide compatible accuracy close to other common numerical solvers, also offers considerable CPU-time consumption, in comparison with the methods that requires matrix manipulations.

Keywords

Galerkin finite volume method Dynamic stress intensity factor Structural elastodynamic problems Unstructured triangular mesh 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aghajanian, S., Baghi, H., Amini, F., & Samani, M. (2014). Optimal control of steel structures by improved particle swarm. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14, 223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-2003-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amini, F., & Zabihi-Samani, M. (2014). A wavelet-based adaptive pole assignment method for structural control. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29, 464–477.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. L. (2004). Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and applications (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijelonja, I., Demirdžić, I., & Muzaferija, S. (2006). A finite volume method for incompressible linear elasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, 6378–6390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.01.005.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, S. K., Tuba, I. S., & Wilson, W. K. (1970). On the finite element method in linear fracture mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(70)90026-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fedelinski, P., Aliabadi, M. H., & Rooke, D. P. (1996). The Laplace transform DBEM for mixed-mode dynamic crack analysis. Computers & Structures, 59, 1021–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00347-9.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Fryer, Y. D., Bailey, C., Cross, M., & Lai, C. H. (1991). A control volume procedure for solving the elastic stress–strain equations on an unstructured mesh. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 15, 639–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(09)81010-X.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghanooni-Bagha, M., Shayanfar, M., Reza-Zadeh, O., & Zabihi-Samani, M. (2017). The effect of materials on the reliability of reinforced concrete beams in normal and intense corrosions. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability, 19, 393–402.  https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2017.3.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu, Y. T., & Liu, G. R. (2001). A meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method for free and forced vibration analyses for solids. Computational Mechanics, 27, 188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660100237.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Irwin, G. R. (1957). Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24, 361–364.Google Scholar
  11. Naeiji, A., Raji, F., & Zisis, I. (2017). Wind loads on residential scale rooftop photovoltaic panels. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 168, 228–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nayroles, B., Touzot, G., & Villon, P. (1992). Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements. Computational Mechanics, 10, 307–318.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364252.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Rice, J. R. (1968). A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35, 379–386.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3601206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rybicki, E. F., & Kanninen, M. F. (1977). A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 9, 931–938.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R., Mastorakis, N. E., & Esmaili, M. (2008). Explicit 2D matrix free Galerkin finite volume solution of plane strain structural problems on triangular meshes. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
  16. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R., & Ali-Mohammadi, S. (2011). Performance evaluation of iterative GFVM on coarse unstructured triangular meshes and comparison with matrix manipulation based solution methods. Scientia Iranica, 18, 131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R., Ali-Mohammadi, S., & Pipelzadeh, M. K. (2012). Unstructured finite volume method for matrix free explicit solution of stress–strain fields in two dimensional problems with curved boundaries in equilibrium condition. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 2224–2236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.08.001.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R., Farhoud, A., & Asil Gharebaghi, S. (2018). Simulation of 2D linear crack growth under constant load using GFVM and two-point displacement extrapolation method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 61, 650–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.05.022.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Slone, A. K., Bailey, C., & Cross, M. (2003). Dynamic solid mechanics using finite volume methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 27, 69–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(02)00060-4.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Suliman, R., Oxtoby, O. F., Malan, A. G., & Kok, S. (2014). An enhanced finite volume method to model 2D linear elastic structures. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 2265–2279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.028.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Timoshenko, S. P., & Goodier, J. N. (1970). Theory of elasticity (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Tran, V.-X., Geniaut, S., Galenne, E., & Nistor, I. (2013). A modal analysis for computation of stress intensity factors under dynamic loading conditions at low frequency using extended finite element method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 98, 122–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang, J., Liew, K. M., Tan, M. J., & Rajendran, S. (2002). Analysis of rectangular laminated composite plates via FSDT meshless method. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 44, 1275–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00057-7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Wheel, M. A. (1996). A geometrically versatile finite volume formulation for plane elastostatic stress analysis. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 31, 111–116.  https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247V312111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xuan, Z. C., Khoo, B. C., & Li, Z. R. (2006). Computing bounds to mixed-mode stress intensity factors in elasticity. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 75, 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-005-0388-3.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Zabihi-Samani, M., & Ghanooni-Bagha, M. (2018). Optimal semi-active structural control with a wavelet-based cuckoo-search fuzzy logic controller. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0206-0.Google Scholar
  27. Zisis, I., Raji, F., & Candelario Jose, D. (2017). Large-scale wind tunnel tests of canopies attached to low-rise buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 23, B4016005.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentK.N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Parand BranchIslamic Azad UniversityParandIran

Personalised recommendations