Advertisement

Differential Responses of Seed Yield and Yield Components to Nutrient Deficiency Between Direct Sown and Transplanted Winter Oilseed Rape

  • Rihuan Cong
  • Yin Wang
  • Xiaokun Li
  • Tao Ren
  • Jianwei LuEmail author
Research
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Both transplanting and direct-sowing are the dominated methods for establishing winter oilseed rape in China. It is important to understand crop performances and responses to nutrient deficiency between transplanted oilseed rape (TOR) and direct sown oilseed rape (DOR). We estimated the effects of establishment methods (transplanting and direct-sowing) and nutrient deficiency (N, P, and K) on rapeseed yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake from 32 site-years field experiments. We found that DOR plants produced lower seed yield, dry matter, and harvest index than TOR plants. The population density in DOR was higher with poor individual growth as reflected by significantly reduced branches, pods, and seeds pod−1. Thus, DOR plants were more sensitive to nutrient deficiency and would lose more yield under nutrient omission conditions. TOR and DOR yields significantly correlated with all yield components except for 1000-seed weight. Pod number plant−1 showed the strongest direct effect on TOR yield. However, population density and pod number plant−1 exhibited highest direct effect on DOR yield. The uptakes and harvest indexes of N and P were higher for TOR, while the DOR plots received higher K uptake and harvest index of K. DOR was more sensitive to nutrient deficiency and its nutrient management should be paid more attention.

Keywords

Oilseed rape Establishment method Nutrient efficiency Yield components Nutrient uptake 

Abbreviations

DOR

Direct sown winter oilseed rape

TOR

Transplanted winter oilseed rape

DHI

Dry matter harvest index

YRB

Yangtze River Basin

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0200908), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-12), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662017JC010), and International Plant Nutrition Institute Co-operation Program (Hubei-35). We are grateful to Yanhong Lu, Yongchun Zhang, Lina Jiang, Fusheng Yuan, and Ji Wu for their excellent supports in conducting the on-farm experiments. There is no conflict of interest in the manuscript.

References

  1. Ali, N., Javidfar, F., Elmira, J., & Mirza, M. Y. (2003). Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 35(2), 167–174.Google Scholar
  2. Amanullah, Hassan, M., & Malhi, S. S. (2011). Seed yield and yield components response of rape (B. napus) versus mustard (B. juncea) to sulfur and potassium fertilizer application in northwest Pakistan. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34(8), 1164–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2011.558159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas, M., Islam, N., Islam, S., & Ahmen, M. (2009). Seedling raising method for production of transplanted maize. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 4(2), 6–13.Google Scholar
  4. CAY. (2013). China agriculture yearbook. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ciampitti, I. A., Camberato, J. J., Murrell, S. T., & Vyn, T. J. (2013). Maize nutrient accumulation and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen rate: I. Macronutrients. Agronomy Journal, 105(3), 783–795.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui, Z., Zhang, F., Chen, X., Miao, Y., Li, J., Shi, L., et al. (2008). On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil Nmin test. Field Crops Research, 105(1–2), 48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diepenbrock, W. (2000). Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Research, 67(1), 35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(00)00082-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong, H. Z., Li, W. J., Tang, W., Li, Z. H., & Zhang, D. M. (2005). Increased yield and revenue with a seedling transplanting system for hybrid seed production in Bt cotton. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191(2), 116–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00130.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fanadzo, M., Chiduza, C., & Mnkeni, P. N. S. (2009). Comparative response of direct seeded and transplanted maize (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen fertilization at Zanyokwe irrigation scheme, Eastern Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(8), 689–694.Google Scholar
  10. FAO. (2017). FAOSTAT Database. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.
  11. Farooq, M., Siddique, K. H. M., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D.-J., & Wahid, A. (2011). Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil and Tillage Research, 111(2), 87–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hocking, P. J., Randall, P. J., & DeMarco, D. (1997). The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research, 54(2–3), 201–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00049-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hocking, P. J., & Stapper, M. (2001). Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. II. Nitrogen concentrations, N accumulation, and N fertiliser use efficiency. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(6), 635–644.  https://doi.org/10.1071/ar00114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horwitz, W., & Latimer, G. W., Jr. (1970). Official methods to analysis (Vol. 11th, pp. 17–18). Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
  15. Islam, N., & Evans, E. J. (1994). Influence of lodging and nitrogen rate on the yield and yield attributes of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theoretical And Applied Genetics, 88(5), 530–534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01240914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, Y. Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, J. W. (2012). Effect of phosphorus fertilization on yield and phosphorus use efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) with two different cropping intensities in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10(2), 576–579.Google Scholar
  17. Liu, H., Hu, C., Sun, X., Tan, Q., & Nie, Z. (2012). Interactive effects of molybdenum and phosphorus fertilizers on dry matter accumulation, seed yield and yield components in Brassica napus. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10(3–4), 389–392.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, T., Ren, T., White, P. J., Cong, R. H., & Lu, J. W. (2018). Storage nitrogen co-ordinates leaf expansion and photosynthetic capacity in winter oilseed rape. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(12), 2995–3007.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, Q. X., Ren, T., Zhang, Y. W., Li, X. K., Cong, R. H., White, P. J., et al. (2019). Yield loss of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) under nitrogen deficiency is associated with under-regulation of plant population density. European Journal of Agronomy, 103, 80–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Lin, F., Zhang, L., & Zou, J. (2014). Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from direct-seeded and seedling-transplanted rice paddies in southeast China. Plant and Soil, 374(1–2), 285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1878-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, J. W. (2010). Scientific fertilization technology for oilseed rape (in Chinese). Beijing: God Shield Press.Google Scholar
  22. Marjanović-Jeromela, A., Marinković, R., Mijić, A., Zdunić, Z., Ivanovska, S., & Jankulovska, M. (2008). Correlation and path analysis of quantitative traits in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 73(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
  23. Ozer, H. (2003). Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 19(3), 453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00136-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ozer, H., Oral, E., & Dogru, U. (1999). Relationships between yield and yield components on currently improved spring rapeseed cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23, 603–608.Google Scholar
  25. Rajakumar, D., Gurumurthy, S., Pandian, B., & Thiyagarajan, G. (2010). Population dynamics and nutrient spray on the yield and economics of direct sown and transplanted hybrid cotton Tchb 213. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 44(3), 206–210.Google Scholar
  26. Singh, Y., Singh, V. P., Singh, G., Yadav, D. S., Sinha, R. K. P., Johnson, D. E., et al. (2011). The implications of land preparation, crop establishment method and weed management on rice yield variation in the rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Field Crops Research, 121(1), 64–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sparks, D. L., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P., Tabatabai, M., et al. (1996). Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Walinga, I., Lee, J. J. V. D., Houba, V. J. G., Vark, W. V., & Novozamsky, I. (1995). Plant analysis manual (p. 272). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, Y., Lu, J. W., Li, X. K., Li, J. F., Liu, P. P., Xu, W. M., et al. (2011). Study on nitrogen fertilizer effect and optimum fertilizer rate for transplanting and direct-seeding rapeseed (in Chinese). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44(21), 4406–4414.  https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, Y., Lu, J. W., Li, X. K., Liu, B., Yuan, F. S., & Xiao, Z. Q. (2012a). Effects of fertilizers application on growth, seed yield, NPK absorption and accumulation of direct-seeding rapeseed in red soil (in Chinese). Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, (01), 38–42, 52.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, Y., Li, X. K., Li, Y. Y., Li, J. F., Xiao, G. B., Zheng, W., et al. (2012b). Responses of direct-seeding rapeseed to fertilization in fields of red soil different in fertility (in Chinese). Acta Pedologica Sinica, 49(01), 121–129.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, Y., Lu, J. W., Li, X. K., Ren, T., Cong, R. H., & Zhan, L. P. (2013). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and boron fertilizers on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) direct-sown in the Yangtze River basin (in Chinese). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 39(8), 1491–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xin, N. Q., & Tong, P. Y. (1986). Multiple cropping system and it’s development orientation in China (A review) (in Chinese). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 19(4), 88–92.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, C. L., Li, J., Yu, L. P., Li, F., & Ma, N. (2010). Input/output analysis on rapeseed production practices under different cultivation mode (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 32(1), 57–64.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, Z., Lu, J. W., Cong, R. H., Ren, T., & Li, X. K. (2018). Evaluating agroclimatic constraints and yield gaps for winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L)—A case study). Scientific Reports.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20636-2. (Artn 2746).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Zou, J., Lu, J. W., Chen, F., & Li, Y. S. (2009). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and boron fertilizers on yield and profit of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in the yangtze river basin (in Chinese). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 35(1), 87–92.  https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1006.2009.00087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zou, J., Lu, J. W., Li, Y. S., Li, Z. Y., & Chen, F. (2008). Study on the effects of NPK fertilizers and optimum fertilizer rate on direct-seeding rapeseed (In Chinese). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 30(1), 90–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rihuan Cong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yin Wang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xiaokun Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tao Ren
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianwei Lu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River)Ministry of Agriculture and Rural AffairsWuhanChina
  3. 3.College of Resources and Environmental SciencesJilin Agricultural UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations