, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 265–288 | Cite as

Reachable domain for spacecraft with ellipsoidal Delta-V distribution

  • Changxuan WenEmail author
  • Chao Peng
  • Yang Gao
Research Article


Conventional reachable domain (RD) problem with an admissible velocity increment, Δv, in an isotropic distribution, was extended to the general case with Δv in an anisotropic ellipsoidal distribution. Such an extension enables RD to describe the effect of initial velocity uncertainty because a Gaussian form of velocity uncertainty can be regarded as possible velocity deviations that are confined within an error ellipsoid. To specify RD in space, the boundary surface of RD, also known as the envelope, should be determined. In this study, the envelope is divided into two parts: inner and outer envelopes. Thus, the problem of solving the RD envelope is formulated into an optimization problem. The inner and outer reachable boundaries that are closest to and farthest away from the center of the Earth, respectively, were found in each direction. An optimal control policy is then formulated by using the necessary condition for an optimum; that is, the first-order derivative of the performance function with respect to the control variable becomes zero. Mathematical properties regarding the optimal control policy is discussed. Finally, an algorithm to solve the RD envelope is proposed. In general, the proposed algorithm does not require any iteration, and therefore benefits from quick computation. Numerical examples, including two coplanar cases and two 3D cases, are provided, which demonstrate that the proposed algorithm works efficiently.


reachable domain maneuverability orbit uncertainty 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11702293).


  1. [1]
    Vinh, N., Gilbert, E., Howe, R., Sheu, D., Lu, P. Reachable domain for interception at hyperbolic speeds. Acta Astronautica, 1995, 35 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Xue, D., Li, J., Baoyin, H. Study on reachable domain for satellite trajectory with coplanar impulse applied, Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30(1): 88–92.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Xue, D., Li, J., Jiang, F. Reachable domain of a satellite with a coplanar impulse applied, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2010, 42(2): 337–342.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Xue, D., Li, J., Baoyin, H., Jiang, F. Reachable domain for spacecraft with a single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(3): 934–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Li, X., He, X., Zhong, Q. Song, M. Reachable domain for satellite with two kinds of thrust. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 68(11-12): 1860–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wen, C., Zhao, Y., Shi, P., Hao, Z., Orbital accessibility problem for spacecraft with a single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37: 1260–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wen, C., Zhao, Y., Shi, P. Precise determination of reachable domain for spacecraft with single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(4): 1767–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang, G., Cao, X., Ma, G. Reachable domain of spacecraft with a single tangent impulse considering trajectory safety. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 91: 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wen, C., Gurfil, P. Modeling early medium-term evolution of debris clouds using the reachable domain method. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(12): 2649–2660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Breakwell, J. V., Heine, W. Minimum-impulse, timefree transfer between neighboring noncoplanar elliptical orbits with major axes perpendicular to the line of nodes. AIAA Journal, 1969, 7(7):1236–1241.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Marec, J. P. Optimal space trajectories, Elsevier, 2012, 1.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D. On-Orbit Range Set Applications. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Holzinger, M. J., Scheeres, D. Reachability results for nonlinear systems with ellipsoidal initial sets. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2012, 48(2): 1583–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D. J., Erwin, R. S. On-Orbit operational range computation using gaussars variational equations with J2 perturbations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(2): 608–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D., Hauser, J. Optimal reachability sets using generalized independent parameters. Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ribeiro, M. I. Gaussian probability density functions: properties and error characterization. Proceedings of the Institute for Systems and Robotics, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Mahalanobis, P. C. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 1936.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Battin, R. H. An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics. AIAA, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Apostol, T. M., Mathematical Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Weisstein, E. First derivative test. The MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource, 2016, Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Driscoll, T. A., Hale, N., Trefethen, L. N. Chebfun guide. Pafnuty Publications, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Vallado, D. A., McClain, W. D. Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. Springer, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations