Astrodynamics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 265–288

# Reachable domain for spacecraft with ellipsoidal Delta-V distribution

• Changxuan Wen
• Chao Peng
• Yang Gao
Research Article

## Abstract

Conventional reachable domain (RD) problem with an admissible velocity increment, Δv, in an isotropic distribution, was extended to the general case with Δv in an anisotropic ellipsoidal distribution. Such an extension enables RD to describe the effect of initial velocity uncertainty because a Gaussian form of velocity uncertainty can be regarded as possible velocity deviations that are confined within an error ellipsoid. To specify RD in space, the boundary surface of RD, also known as the envelope, should be determined. In this study, the envelope is divided into two parts: inner and outer envelopes. Thus, the problem of solving the RD envelope is formulated into an optimization problem. The inner and outer reachable boundaries that are closest to and farthest away from the center of the Earth, respectively, were found in each direction. An optimal control policy is then formulated by using the necessary condition for an optimum; that is, the first-order derivative of the performance function with respect to the control variable becomes zero. Mathematical properties regarding the optimal control policy is discussed. Finally, an algorithm to solve the RD envelope is proposed. In general, the proposed algorithm does not require any iteration, and therefore benefits from quick computation. Numerical examples, including two coplanar cases and two 3D cases, are provided, which demonstrate that the proposed algorithm works efficiently.

## Keywords

reachable domain maneuverability orbit uncertainty

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11702293).

## References

1. [1]
Vinh, N., Gilbert, E., Howe, R., Sheu, D., Lu, P. Reachable domain for interception at hyperbolic speeds. Acta Astronautica, 1995, 35 (1): 1–8.
2. [2]
Xue, D., Li, J., Baoyin, H. Study on reachable domain for satellite trajectory with coplanar impulse applied, Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30(1): 88–92.Google Scholar
3. [3]
Xue, D., Li, J., Jiang, F. Reachable domain of a satellite with a coplanar impulse applied, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2010, 42(2): 337–342.Google Scholar
4. [4]
Xue, D., Li, J., Baoyin, H., Jiang, F. Reachable domain for spacecraft with a single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33(3): 934–942.
5. [5]
Li, X., He, X., Zhong, Q. Song, M. Reachable domain for satellite with two kinds of thrust. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 68(11-12): 1860–1864.
6. [6]
Wen, C., Zhao, Y., Shi, P., Hao, Z., Orbital accessibility problem for spacecraft with a single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37: 1260–1271.
7. [7]
Wen, C., Zhao, Y., Shi, P. Precise determination of reachable domain for spacecraft with single impulse. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(4): 1767–1779.
8. [8]
Zhang, G., Cao, X., Ma, G. Reachable domain of spacecraft with a single tangent impulse considering trajectory safety. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 91: 228–236.
9. [9]
Wen, C., Gurfil, P. Modeling early medium-term evolution of debris clouds using the reachable domain method. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(12): 2649–2660.
10. [10]
Breakwell, J. V., Heine, W. Minimum-impulse, timefree transfer between neighboring noncoplanar elliptical orbits with major axes perpendicular to the line of nodes. AIAA Journal, 1969, 7(7):1236–1241.
11. [11]
Marec, J. P. Optimal space trajectories, Elsevier, 2012, 1.Google Scholar
12. [12]
Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D. On-Orbit Range Set Applications. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
13. [13]
Holzinger, M. J., Scheeres, D. Reachability results for nonlinear systems with ellipsoidal initial sets. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2012, 48(2): 1583–1600.
14. [14]
Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D. J., Erwin, R. S. On-Orbit operational range computation using gaussars variational equations with J2 perturbations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(2): 608–622.
15. [15]
Holzinger, M., Scheeres, D., Hauser, J. Optimal reachability sets using generalized independent parameters. Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, 2012.Google Scholar
16. [16]
Ribeiro, M. I. Gaussian probability density functions: properties and error characterization. Proceedings of the Institute for Systems and Robotics, 2004.Google Scholar
17. [17]
Mahalanobis, P. C. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 1936.Google Scholar
18. [18]
Battin, R. H. An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics. AIAA, 1999.Google Scholar
19. [19]
20. [20]
Weisstein, E. First derivative test. The MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource, 2016, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FirstDerivativeTest.Html Google Scholar
21. [21]
Driscoll, T. A., Hale, N., Trefethen, L. N. Chebfun guide. Pafnuty Publications, 2014.Google Scholar
22. [22]
Vallado, D. A., McClain, W. D. Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. Springer, 2001.Google Scholar