Linearized relative motion equations through orbital element differences for general Keplerian orbits
- 207 Downloads
A new formulation of the orbital element-based relative motion equations is developed for general Keplerian orbits. This new solution is derived by performing a Taylor expansion on the Cartesian coordinates in the rotating frame with respect to the orbital elements. The resulted solution is expressed in terms of two different sets of orbital elements. The first one is the classical orbital elements and the second one is the nonsingular orbital elements. Among of them, however, the semi-latus rectum and true anomaly are used due to their generality, rather than the semi-major axis and mean anomaly that are used in most references. This specific selection for orbital elements yields a new solution that is universally applicable to elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic orbits. It is shown that the new orbital element-based relative motion equations are equivalent to the Tschauner-Hempel equations. A linear map between the initial orbital element differences and the integration constants associated with the solution of the Tschauner-Hempel equations is constructed. Finally, the presented solution is validated through comparison with a high-fidelity numerical orbit propagator. The numerical results demonstrate that the new solution is computationally effective; and the result is able to match the accuracy that is required for linear propagation of spacecraft relative motion over a broad range of Keplerian orbits.
Keywordsrelative motion Keplerian orbits orbital element linearized equations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61403416) and the “The Hundred Talents Program” of Chinese Academy of Science.
- Tschauner, J., Hempel, P. OptimaleBeschleunigungspro-gramme fur das Rendezvous-Manover. Astronautica Acta, 1964, 10(5-6): 296–307.Google Scholar
- Lawden, D. F. Fundamentals of space navigation. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 1954, 13(2): 87–101.Google Scholar
- Dang, Z. Solutions of Tschauner-Hempel Equations. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2017, 40(11): 2953–2957.Google Scholar
- Garrison, J. L., Gardner, T. G., Axelrad, P. Relative motion in highly elliptical orbits. Space ight Mechanics 1995, 1995: 1359–1376.Google Scholar
- Alfriend, K. T., Gim, D. W., Schaub, H. Gravitational perturbations, nonlinearity and circular orbit assumption effects on formation flying control strategies. Guidance and Control 2000, 2000: 139–158.Google Scholar
- Alfriend, K. T., Yan, H. Orbital elements approach to the nonlinear formation flying problem. International Formation Flying Symposium, Toulouse, France. 2002.Google Scholar
- Vadali, S., Yan, H., Alfriend, K. Formation maintenance and fuel balancing for satellites with impulsive control. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conference, 2008, AIAA 2008–7359.Google Scholar
- Alfriend, K., Vadali, S. R., Gurfil, P. How, J., Breger, L. Spacecraft formation flying: dynamics, control and navigation. Elsevier, 2009.Google Scholar