Journal of Flow Chemistry

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 161–174 | Cite as

Continuous synthesis of plate-like silica microparticles using microfluidics

  • Mohsen Tamtaji
  • Aliasghar MohammadiEmail author
Full Paper


The synthesis of plate-like silica particles, which are of importance for a variety of applications, are mainly based on the widely adopted method of the sol-gel reaction of silicon alkoxides in traditional batch-wise instrumentation. In this study, continuous-flow synthesis of amorphous plate-like silica particles is reported through combining droplet-based microfluidics and the sol-gel reaction of tetraethyl orthosilicate. The reaction was conducted at the surface of oil droplets, comprising tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), suspended in acidic (HCl) water, resulting in silica particles on the surface of the droplets, leaving the device with outlet flow. The synthesized particles had plate-like structure with thickness less than 1 μm and microscale in two other dimensions. The influences of experimental parameters (TEOS and HCl concentrations and the flow rate of aqueous phase) on the silica production rate were examined. With increase in the TEOS and HCl concentrations, the production rate increases monotonically. With increase in the flow rate of aqueous phase, the production rate increases up to a specific flow rate. Beyond the flow rate, the production rate decreases with increase in the flow rate. A phenomenological model is proposed to address the production rate using the droplet-based microfluidic system. In addition, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to statistically model and optimize the production rate. At optimum values for the experimental parameters, the experimentally measured production rate was considerably comparable to that predicted by RSM.


Microfluidics Droplet-based Synthesis Silica Plate-like 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

41981_2019_34_MOESM1_ESM.docx (10 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 10260 kb)

(MP4 1688 kb)


  1. 1.
    Xiong Y, Wiley BJ, Xia Y (2007) Nanocrystals with unconventional shapes—a class of promising catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:7157–7159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zhao J, Van Duyne RP (2008) Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat Mater 7:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linic S, Christopher P, Ingram DB (2011) Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat Mater 10:911–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liong M, Lu J, Kovochich M, Xia T, Ruehm SG, Nel AE et al (2008) Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. ACS Nano 2:889–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang X, El-Sayed IH, Qian W, El-Sayed MA (2006) Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 128:2115–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee K, Losego MD, Parsons GN (2014) High performance photocatalytic metal oxide synthetic bi-component nanosheets formed by atomic layer deposition. Materials Horizons 1:419–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar DR, Kulkarni A, Prasad B (2014) Microfluidic platform for continuous flow synthesis of triangular gold nanoplates. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 443:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu P (2008) Preparation and characterization of conducting polyaniline/silica nanosheet composites. Curr Opinion Solid State Mater Sci 12:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo D, Wang F, Zhu J, Cao F, Liu Y, Li X et al (2016) Nanofluid of graphene-based amphiphilic Janus nanosheets for tertiary or enhanced oil recovery: high performance at low concentration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:7711–7716Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin T, Li H, Su L, Liu S, Yuan C, Fu D (2016) The catalytic effect of TiO2 nanosheets on extracellular electron transfer of Shewanella loihica PV-4. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:29871–29878Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Behzadi A, Mohammadi A (2016) Environmentally responsive surface-modified silica nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery. J Nanopart Res 18:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Liang F, Wang Q, Qu X, Yang Z (2015) Flexible responsive Janus nanosheets. Chem Commun 51:3562–3565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang F, Shen K, Qu X, Zhang C, Wang Q, Li J et al (2011) Inorganic janus nanosheets. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:2379–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yi Y, Sanchez L, Gao Y, Yu Y (2016) Janus particles for biological imaging and sensing. Analyst 141:3526–3539Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chevalier Y, Bolzinger M-A (2013) Emulsions stabilized with solid nanoparticles: Pickering emulsions. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 439:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang X, Xu J, Wang Q, Xu A, Zhai Y, Luo J et al (2017) Wet chemical synthesis of silica nanosheets via ethyl acetate-mediated hydrolysis of silica precursors and their applications. Small 13:1603369Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iler RK (1955) The colloid chemistry of silica and silicates, vol 80. LWWGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A (2004) Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:381–411Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Bellefon C (2004) Chemical micro-process engineering. Fundamentals, modelling and reactions. By Volker Hessel, Steffen Hardt and Holger Löwe. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:6583–6584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hönicke D (1999) Microchemical reactors for heterogeneously catalyzed reactions. Stud Surf Sci Catal 122:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belliveau NM, Huft J, Lin PJ, Chen S, Leung AK, Leaver TJ et al (2012) Microfluidic synthesis of highly potent limit-size lipid nanoparticles for in vivo delivery of siRNA. Molecular Therapy—Nucleic Acids 1:e37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dittrich PS, Manz A (2006) Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zheng B, Tice JD, Ismagilov RF (2004) Formation of arrayed droplets by soft lithography and two-phase fluid flow, and application in protein crystallization. Adv Mater 16:1365–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhu Y, Power BE (2008) Lab-on-a-chip in vitro compartmentalization technologies for protein studies. In: Werther M, Seitz H (eds) Protein – Protein Interaction. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 110:81–114Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sen A, Darabi J, Knapp D (2009) Design, fabrication and test of a microfluidic nebulizer chip for desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 137:789–796Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhardwaj P, Bagdi P, Sen A (2011) Microfluidic device based on a micro-hydrocyclone for particle–liquid separation. Lab Chip 11:4012–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tian W-C, Finehout E (2009) Microfluidics for biological applications, vol 16. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Joensson HN, Andersson Svahn H (2012) Droplet microfluidics—a tool for single-cell analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:12176–12192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao C-X, He L, Qiao SZ, Middelberg AP (2011) Nanoparticle synthesis in microreactors. Chem Eng Sci 66:1463–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hung L-H, Lee AP (2007) Microfluidic devices for the synthesis of nanoparticles and biomaterials. J Med Biol Eng 27:1Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Song Y, Hormes J, Kumar CS (2008) Microfluidic synthesis of nanomaterials. Small 4:698–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shestopalov I, Tice JD, Ismagilov RF (2004) Multi-step synthesis of nanoparticles performed on millisecond time scale in a microfluidic droplet-based system. Lab Chip 4:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wacker JB, Lignos I, Parashar VK, Gijs MA (2012) Controlled synthesis of fluorescent silica nanoparticles inside microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 12:3111–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pérez-Page M, Yu E, Li J, Rahman M, Dryden DM, Vidu R et al (2016) Template-based syntheses for shape controlled nanostructures. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 234:51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eun TH, Kim S-H, Jeong W-J, Jeon S-J, Kim S-H, Yang S-M (2009) Single-step fabrication of monodisperse TiO2 hollow spheres with embedded nanoparticles in microfluidic devices. Chem Mater 21:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sebastian V, Basak S, Jensen KF (2016) Continuous synthesis of palladium nanorods in oxidative segmented flow. AIChE J 62:373–380Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hassan N, Stocco A, Abou-Hassan A (2015) Droplet liquid/liquid interfaces generated in a microfluidic device for assembling Janus inorganic nanohybrids. J Phys Chem C 119:10758–10765Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wojnicki M, Tokarski T, Hessel V, Fitzner K, Luty-Błocho M (2019) Continuous, monodisperse silver nanoparticles synthesis using microdroplets as a reactor. J Flow Chem 9:1–7Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jundale R, Bari A, Thara C, Kulkarni A (2018) Continuous flow synthesis of micron size silica nanoparticles: parametric study and effect of dosing strategy. J Flow Chem 8:59–67Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brinker CJ, Scherer GW (2013) Sol-gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Academic pressGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cao Z, Wang G, Chen Y, Liang F, Yang Z (2015) Light-triggered responsive Janus composite nanosheets. Macromolecules 48:7256–7261Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nguyen N-T, Wereley ST (2002) Fundamentals and applications of microfluidics. Artech HouseGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Veglio F, Trifoni M, Pagnanelli F, Toro L (2001) Shrinking core model with variable activation energy: a kinetic model of manganiferous ore leaching with sulphuric acid and lactose. Hydrometallurgy 60:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Levenspiel O (1999) Chemical reaction engineering. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:4140–4143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iles A, Oki A, Pamme N (2007) Bonding of soda-lime glass microchips at low temperature. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:119–122Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mahadik SA, Kavale MS, Mukherjee S, Rao AV (2010) Transparent superhydrophobic silica coatings on glass by sol–gel method. Appl Surf Sci 257:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zeibi Shirejini S, Mohammadi A (2017) Halogen–lithium exchange reaction using an integrated glass microfluidic device: an optimized synthetic approach. Org Process Res Dev 21:292–303Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Polak J, Lu BC-Y (1973) Mutual solubilities of hydrocarbons and water at 0 and 25 C. Can J Chem 51:4018–4023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Metin CO, Baran JR, Nguyen QP (2012) Adsorption of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles onto mineral surfaces and decane/water interface. J Nanopart Res 14:1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rao KS, El-Hami K, Kodaki T, Matsushige K, Makino K (2005) A novel method for synthesis of silica nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 289:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Qasim M, Ananthaiah J, Dhara S, Paik P, Das D (2014) Synthesis and characterization of ultra-fine colloidal silica nanoparticles. Adv Sci Eng Med 6:965–973Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhao M, Tang Z, Liu P (2008) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution with silica nano-sheets derived from vermiculite. J Hazard Mater 158:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kumar CS (2013) UV-VIS and photoluminescence spectroscopy for nanomaterials characterization. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schmidt HK, Scholze H, Kaiser A (1984) Principles of hydrolysis and condensation reaction of alkoxysilanes. J Non-Cryst Solids 63:1–11Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ro JC, Chung IJ (1989) Sol-gel kinetics of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) in acid catalyst. J Non-Cryst Solids 110:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schubert U (2015) The sol-gel handbook: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Wiley, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Katepalli H, Bose A (2014) Response of surfactant stabilized oil-in-water emulsions to the addition of particles in an aqueous suspension. Langmuir 30:12736–12742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vatanparast H, Shahabi F, Bahramian A, Javadi A, Miller R (2018) The role of electrostatic repulsion on increasing surface activity of anionic surfactants in the presence of hydrophilic silica nanoparticles. Sci Rep 8:7251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hui Y, Zishang D, Zhonghua J, Xiaoping X (1989) Sol-gel process kinetics for Si(OEt)4. J Non-Cryst Solids 112:449–453Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Homma S, Ogata S, Koga J, Matsumoto S (2005) Gas–solid reaction model for a shrinking spherical particle with unreacted shrinking core. Chem Eng Sci 60:4971–4980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee KT, Koon OW (2009) Modified shrinking unreacted-core model for the reaction between sulfur dioxide and coal fly ash/CaO/CaSO4 sorbent. Chem Eng J 146:57–62Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Missen RW, Mims CA, Saville BA (1999) Introduction to chemical reaction engineering and kinetics. J. WileyGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yagi S, Kunii D (1961) Fluidized-solids reactors with continuous solids feed—II: conversion for overflow and carryover particles. Chem Eng Sci 16:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Teh S-Y, Lin R, Hung L-H, Lee AP (2008) Droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip 8:198–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations