Advertisement

Ratio- and product-based estimators using known coefficient of variation of the auxiliary variable via modified maximum likelihood

  • Sanjay KumarEmail author
  • Priyanka Chhaparwal
Original Research
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we improve ratio- and product-based estimators for population mean using known coefficient of variation of the auxiliary variable through modified maximum likelihood. The expressions for biases and mean square errors of the proposed estimators have been obtained theoretically. We obtain some conditions under which the proposed estimators have minimum mean square errors than other existing estimators. For the support of the theoretical outcomes, simulations studies have been made under several super-population models. One real life application for the support of the properties of the proposed estimator has also been given. We also study the robustness properties of the proposed estimators. We show that the use of modified maximum likelihood estimates in estimating finite population mean results to robust estimates under non-normality and outliers. Confidence intervals show that the proposed estimator has shorter confidence intervals and more coverage of estimates than those of the existing estimators.

Keywords

Ratio estimator Product estimator Simulation study Modified maximum likelihood Population coefficient of variation Confidence interval 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62D05 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Editors and referees for their valuable suggestions which led to improvements in the work.

References

  1. Bouza CN (2008) Ranked set sampling for the product estimator. Rev Investig Oper 29(3):201–206MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouza CN (2015) A family of ratio estimators of the mean containing primals and duals for simple random sampling with replacement and ranked set sampling designs. J Basic Appl Res Int 8(4):245–253Google Scholar
  3. Chanu WW, Singh BK (2014) Improved class of ratio-cum-product estimators of finite population mean in two phase sampling. Glob J Sci Front Res 14(2–1):69–81Google Scholar
  4. Chanu WW, Singh BK, Tato YA (2016) Generalized class of double sampling ratio cum dual to ratio estimator in presence of non-response. GU J Sci 29(2):335–341Google Scholar
  5. Choudhury S, Singh BK (2012) A class of chain ratio-cum-dual to ratio type estimator with two auxiliary characters under double sampling in sample surveys. Stat Trans New Ser 13(3):519–536Google Scholar
  6. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Diana G, Giordan M, Perri PF (2011) An improved class of estimators for the population mean. Stat Methods Appl 20:123–140MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta S, Shabbir J (2008) On the improvement in estimating the population mean in simple random sampling. J App Stat 35(5):559–566MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta S, Shabbir J (2011) On estimating finite population mean in simple and stratified sampling. Commun Stat Theory Method 40:199–212MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar S (2015) A robust regression type estimator for estimating population mean under non normality in the presence of non-response. Glob J Sci Front Res F 15(7–1):43–55Google Scholar
  11. Kumar S, Chhaparwal P (2016) A robust unbiased dual to product estimator for population mean through modified maximum likelihood in simple random sampling. Cogent Math 3:1168070MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar S, Chhaparwal P (2017) Robust exponential ratio and product type estimators for population mean using order statistics in simple random sampling. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 38(3):51–70Google Scholar
  13. Murthy MN (1967) Sampling theory and methods. Statistical Publishing Society, CalcuttazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Oral E (2006) Binary regression with stochastic covariates. Commun Stat Theory Method 35:1429–1447MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Oral E (2010) Improving efficiency of ratio-type estimators through order statistics. JSM Proceedings, section on survey research methods. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, pp 4231–4239Google Scholar
  16. Oral E, Kadilar C (2011) Robust ratio-type estimators in simple random sampling. J Korean Stat Soc 40:457–467MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Oral E, Oral E (2011) A robust alternative to the ratio estimator under non-normality. Stat Probab Lett 81:930–936MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Pandey BN, Dubey V (1988) Modified product estimator using coefficient of variation of auxiliary variate. Assam Stat Rev 2:64–66Google Scholar
  19. Penrose K, Nelson A, Fisher AG (1985) A generalized body composition prediction equation for men using simple measurement techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17(2):189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Puthenpura S, Sinha NK (1986) Modified maximum likelihood method for the robust estimation of system parameters from very noisy data. Automatica 22:231–235CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rao JNK, Beegle LD (1967) A Monte Carlo study of some ratio estimators. Sankhya Ser B 29:47–56MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh HP, Solanki RS (2012) An alternative procedure for estimating the population mean in simple random sampling. Pak J Stat Oper Res VIII 2:213–232MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sisodia BVS, Dwivedi VK (1981) A modified ratio estimator using coefficient of variation of auxiliary variable. J Indian Soc Agric Stat New Delhi 33:13–18Google Scholar
  24. Sukhatme PV, Sukhatme BV, Asok C (1984) Sampling theory of surveys with applications. Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, New DelhizbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiku ML, Akkaya AD (2004) Robust estimation and hypothesis testing. New Age International (P) Limited, New DelhizbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiku ML, Bhasln P (1982) Usefulness of robust estimators in sample survey. Commun Stat Theory Method 11:2597–2610.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918208828409 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiku ML, Kumra S (1981) Expected values and variances and covariances of order statistics for a family of symmetric distributions (student’s t). In: Selected tables in mathematical statistics. Am Math Soc 8:141–270Google Scholar
  28. Tiku ML, Suresh RP (1992) A new method of estimation for location and scale parameters. J Stat Plann Inference 30:281–292MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiku ML, Vellaisamy P (1996) Improving efficiency of survey sample procedures through order statistics. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 49:363–385Google Scholar
  30. Vaughan DC (1992a) On the Tiku-Suresh method of estimation. Commun Stat Theory Method 21:451–469MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaughan DC (1992b) Expected values, variances and covariances of order statistics for student’s t-distribution with two degrees of freedom. Commun Stat Simul Comput 21:391–404CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Vaughan DC, Tiku ML (2000) Estimation and hypothesis testing for non-normal bivariate distribution with applications. Math Comput Model 32:53–67CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Yadav SK, Kadilar C (2013) Efficient family of exponential estimators for the population mean. Hacet J Math Stat 42(6):671–677MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Yates F (1960) Sampling methods in censuses and surveys. Charles Griffin and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Reliability and Safety (SRESA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsCentral University of RajasthanAjmerIndia

Personalised recommendations