Advertisement

International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 200–221 | Cite as

Verbal Change and Cognitive Change: Conceptual and Methodological Analysis for the Study of Cognitive Restructuring Using the Socratic Dialog

  • María Xesús Froján-Parga
  • Ana Calero-Elvira
  • Rebeca Pardo-Cebrián
  • Miguel Núñez de Prado-Gordillo
Special Issue on Socratic Dialogue

Abstract

In this paper, we will firstly delve in a behaviorally rooted theoretical analysis of the learning processes that could be involved in the employment of Socratic dialog as a means to achieve cognitive restructuring. Three observers analyzed the case of study attending to the client–therapist interaction during the cognitive restructuring using the Socratic method. Different types of Discriminative Stimulus–Response–Reinforcement interaction sequences were specified during the debate and after the client’s pro-therapeutic verbalizations. A progressive increase in the frequency of pro-therapeutic verbalizations was observed. Taking into account the limitations of a case study, our results seem to fit those obtained in previous studies and suggest a possible explanation of the therapeutic process in general and the Socratic method in particular (at least as it is employed here) in terms of verbal shaping and verbal chaining. These processes would lead to the learning of rational thoughts which, in turn, would guide the client’s overt behavior to make it more pro-therapeutic.

Keywords

Socratic method Behaviorist standpoint Client–therapist interaction Verbal shaping Verbal chaining 

Notes

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, I + D + I Research Grants SEJ2007-66537-PSIC, PSI2010-15908). The funding source had no involvement in the design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the paper, nor in the decision to submit the article for publication.

References

  1. Alcaraz, V. M. (1990). Análisis de las funciones del lenguaje [analysis of the functions of language]. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 209–229). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  2. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am Psychol, 61, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrington, R. L. (1990). La nueva filosofía del lenguaje y su relación con la teoría de la psicología y con la formación de conceptos [the new philosophy of language and its relation with theory of psychology and the forming of concepts]. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 299–342). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  4. Bakeman, R. (2000). En H. T. Reis, y C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1990). Control de la conducta operante humana por medio de instrucciones [the control of human operant behavior through instructions]. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 123–167). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, A. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Past, present and future. In M. Mahoney (Ed.), Cognitive and constructive psychotherapies. Theory, research and practice (pp. 29–39). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression: A treatment manual. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, M. E. (1991). Using rational-emotive therapy effectively: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brestan, E. V., & Eyberg, S. M. (1998). Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2702_5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev, 26(1), 17–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Calero-Elvira, A. (2009). Análisis de la interacción entre terapeuta y cliente durante la aplicación de la técnica de reestructuración cognitiva. [analysis of the interaction between therapist and client during the application of the cognitive restructuring technique] (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  13. Calero-Elvira, A., Froján-Parga, M. X., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2011a). Investigación de resultados y de procesos sobre la técnica de reestructuración cognitiva [Results and processes research on cognitive restructuring technique]. Apuntes de Psicología, 29, 359–377.Google Scholar
  14. Calero-Elvira, A., Froján-Parga, M. X., Ruiz-Sancho, E. M., & Vargas-de la Cruz, I. (2011b). ¿Qué hace el psicólogo cuando aplica la técnica de reestructuración cognitiva? [what does the psychologist do when applying the cognitive restructuring technique?]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 28, 133–150.Google Scholar
  15. Calero-Elvira, A., Froján-Parga, M. X., Ruiz-Sancho, E., & Alpañés-Freitag, M. (2013). Descriptive study of the Socratic method: evidence for verbal shaping. Behavior Therapy, 44, 625–638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2013.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2004). What is Socratic questioning? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41(3), 217–226.Google Scholar
  17. Caro, I. G. (2011). Hacia una práctica eficaz de las psicoterapias cognitivas: Modelos y técnicas principales [Towards an effective practice of cognitive psychotherapies: Principal models and techniques]. Bilbao, Spain: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  18. Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. En S.C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 119–150). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Johnston, S. B., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49(2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  20. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, G. I., & Egan, S. J. (2015). The Socratic method in cognitive behavioural therapy: a narrative review. Cognitive Therapy Research, 39, 863–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deitz, S. M. (1990). Criterios para desarrollar un lenguaje técnico del análisis de la conducta: contribuciones de la filosofía y la psicología [Criteria for developing a technical language for behavioral analysis: contributions from philosophy and psychology]. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 343–382). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  24. Dryden, W., DiGiuseppe, R., & Neenan, M. (2003). A primer on rational emotive behavior therapy. Champaign: U.S.: Research Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lile Stuart.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, A. (1995). Reflections on rational-emotive therapy. In M. Mahoney (Ed.), Cognitive and constructive psychotherapies. Theory, research and practice (pp. 69–73). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. (1977). Handbook of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Freixa, E. B. (2003). Qué es conducta? What is behavior? International Journal of Clinical Health Psychology, 3, 595–613.Google Scholar
  29. Froján-Parga, M. X., & Calero-Elvira, A. (2011). Guía para el uso de la reestructuración cognitiva como un procedimiento de moldeamiento [A guide for the use of cognitive restructuring as a shaping procedure]. Psicologia Conductual, 19, 659–682.Google Scholar
  30. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2006). Procesos de aprendizaje en las técnicas de reestructuración semántica [Learning processes in cognitive restructuring techniques]. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 32, 287–305.Google Scholar
  31. Froján-Parga, M. X., Montaño-Fidalgo, M., Calero-Elvira, A., & Ruiz-Sancho, E. (2008). Sistema de categorización de la conducta verbal del terapeuta. [Therapist’s verbal behavior coding system]. Psicothema, 20(4), 603–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2009). Analysis of the therapist’s verbal behavior during cognitive restructuring debates: a case study. Psychother Res, 19, 30–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802326046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Froján-Parga, M. X., Montaño-Fidalgo, M., & Calero-Elvira, A. (2010). Verbal behavior analysis: a descriptive approach to psychotherapeutic phenomenon. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 914–926.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2011). Study of the Socratic method during cognitive restructuring. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 110–123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayes, S. C., Follete, W. C., & Follete, V. M. (1995). Behavior therapy: a contextual approach. In S. S. Gurman & S. B. Messer (Eds.), Essential psychotherapies. Theory and practice (pp. 128–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999a). Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., Coper, I., & Grundt, A. (1999b). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holt, E. B. (1915). Response and cognition II: cognition as response. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 12, 393–409.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2012945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kazantzis, N., Fairburn, C. G., Padesky, C. A., Reinecke, M., & Teesson, M. (2014). Unresolved issues regarding the research and practice of cognitive behavior therapy: the case of guided discovery using Socratic questioning. Behaviour Change, 31, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kazdin, A. (1978). History of behavior modification. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kennerley, H. (2007). Socratic method. Oxford: Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Essential Guides.Google Scholar
  43. Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991). Functional analytic psychotherapy: creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  46. Malott, R. W., Malott, M. E., & Trojan, E. A. (1999). Elementary principles of behavior (4th ed.). México: Pearson.Google Scholar
  47. Marr, M. J. (1990). El lenguaje y la mecánica cuántica [Language and quantum mechanics]. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 267–297). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  48. McMullin, R. E., & Giles, T. R. (1981). Cognitive behavior-therapy. A restructuring approach. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  49. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis Special Issue: Establishing Operations in Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miltenberger, R., & Ortega, J. (2012). Behavior modification. Principles & procedures (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  53. Mowrer, O. H. (1954). The psychologist looks at language. American Psychologist, 9, 660–694.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nathan, P. E., & Gorman, J. M. (2007). A guide to treatments that work (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Overholser, J. C. (1993a). Elements of the socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy, 30, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Overholser, J. C. (1993b). Elements of the socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning. Psychotherapy, 30, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy, 31, 286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Overholser, J. C. (1995). Elements of the socratic method: IV. Disavowal of knowledge. Psychotherapy, 32, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Overholser, J. C. (1996). Elements of the socratic method: V. Self-improvement. Psychotherapy, 33, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Overholser, J. C. (1999). Elements of the socratic method: VI. Promoting virtue in everyday life. Psychotherapy, 36, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Padesky, C. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery? London: Keynote address delivered at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies.Google Scholar
  62. Padesky, C. A., & Greenberg, D. (1995). Clinician’s guide to mind over mood. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Pérez, M. (1996a). La psicoterapia desde el punto de vista conductista [psychotherapy from the behaviorist point of view]. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
  64. Pérez, M. (1996b). Tratamientos psicológicos [Psychological treatments]. Madrid: Universitas.Google Scholar
  65. Primero, G. (2002). Los orígenes filosóficos del mentalismo y las críticas de Wittgenstein a las posturas mentalistas [Philosophical origins of mentalism and Wittgenstein’s criticism of mentalist positions]. Retrieved from http://conducta.org/.
  66. Ribes, E. (1990). Las conductas lingüística y simbólica como procesos sustitutivos de contingencias Linguistic and symbolic behavior as contingencies-substitute processes. In E. Ribes & P. Harzem (Eds.), Lenguaje y conducta [language and behavior] (pp. 193–207). Ciudad de México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  67. Robins, C. J., & Hayes, A. M. (1995). An appraisal of cognitive therapy. In M. Mahoney (Ed.), Cognitive and constructive psychotherapies. Theory, research and practice (pp. 41–65). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Rosenfarb, I. S. (2013). A functional analysis of schizophrenia. Psychol Rec, 63, 929–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ruiz, E. M. (2011). Una aproximación funcional al estudio de la interacción verbal en terapia [a functional approach to the study of verbal interaction in therapy]. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  70. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.Google Scholar
  71. Sacco, W. P. & Beck, A. T. (1995). Cognitive theory and therapy. In E. E. Beckham, W. R. Leber (Eds.), Handbook of depression (pp. 329–351). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  72. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  73. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  75. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  76. Tomasini, A. (2004). Ensayos de filosofía de la psicología [essays on philosophy of psychology] (2nd ed.). Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
  77. Tomasini, A. (2005). Lenguaje y antimetafísica: cavilaciones wittgensteinianas [language and antimetaphysics: Wittgensteinian meditations] (2nd ed.). México: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
  78. Varela, J. (2008). Conceptos básicos del interconductismo [basic concepts of interbehaviorism]. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
  79. Vargas-de la Cruz, I. (2011). Estudio de las reglas que emite el terapeuta durante la intervención clínica [study of the rules emitted by the therapist during the clinic intervention] (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  80. Virués-Ortega, J., Montaño, M., Frojan-Parga, M. X., & Calero, A. (2011). Descriptive analysis of the therapist’s verbal behavior: Known-group validity analysis of the behavioral functions of clinical interaction. Behavior Therapy, 42, 547–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.004.
  81. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Londres: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  83. Westbrook, D. (2014). The central pillars of CBT. In A. Whittington & N. Grey (Eds.), How to become a more effective CBT therapist: Mastering metacompetence in clinical practice (pp. 17–30). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  84. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen [philosophical investigations]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  85. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive behavioral research and therapy (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Xesús Froján-Parga
    • 1
  • Ana Calero-Elvira
    • 1
  • Rebeca Pardo-Cebrián
    • 1
  • Miguel Núñez de Prado-Gordillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Health PsychologyUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid (Campus de Cantoblanco)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations