Advertisement

International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 222–233 | Cite as

Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome in Complicated Grief Treatment

  • Kim GlickmanEmail author
  • M. Katherine Shear
  • Melanie M. Wall
Regular Article
First Online:
  • 161 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we examined the role of the therapeutic alliance in complicated grief treatment (CGT), an efficacious psychotherapy for complicated grief. Using data from a previously reported randomized controlled trial, we explored whether the alliance–outcome relationship differs by treatment group among treatment completers assigned to either CGT (n = 35) or interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (n = 34). Early alliance (at week 4) was associated with a reduction in grief symptoms in CGT but not IPT. The difference in the alliance–outcome relationship was accounted for by goal/task items on the Working Alliance Inventory. The contribution of a positive alliance, particularly the agreement on goals and tasks, may be more significant in CGT, a highly structured treatment, than IPT in reducing symptoms of complicated grief.

Keywords

Therapeutic alliance Complicated grief treatment Psychotherapy outcome 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnow, B. A., Steidtmann, D., Blasey, C., Manber, R., Constantino, M. J., Klein, D. N., et al. (2013). The relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in two distinct psychotherapies for chronic depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(4), 627–638.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, J., Luborsky, L., Christoph-Crits, P., Thase, M. E., Weiss, R., Frank, A., et al. (1999). Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome in treatment of cocaine dependence. Psychotherapy Research, 9(1), 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckner, V., Vella, L., Howard, I., & Mohr, D. (2007). Alliance in two telephone-administered treatments: relationship with depression and health outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 508–512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boelen, P., de Keijser, J., van den Hout, M., & van den Bout, J. (2007). Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 277–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant, R. A., Kenny, L., Joscelyne, A., Rawson, N., Maccallum, F., Cahill, C., et al. (2014). Treating prolonged grief disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(12), 1332–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrd, K. R., Patterson, C. L., & Turchik, J. A. (2010). Working alliance as a mediator of client attachment dimensions and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training, 47(4), 631–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capaldi, S., Asnaani, A., Zandberg, L. J., Carpenter, J. K., & Foa, E. B. (2016). Therapeutic alliance during prolonged exposure versus client-centered therapy for adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22303.
  9. Eisma, M. C., Boelen, P. A., van den Bout, J., Stroebe, W., Schut, H. A., Lancee, J., et al. (2015). Internet-based exposure and behavioral activation for complicated grief and rumination: a randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 46(6), 729–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Falkenstrom, F., Granstrom, F., & Holmqvist, R. (2013). Therapeutic alliance predicts symptomatic improvement session by session. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 317–328.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Falkenstrom, F., Hatcher, R. L., & Holmqvist, R. (2015a). Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient version of the working alliance inventory—short form revised. Assessment, 22(5), 581–593.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114552472.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Falkenstrom, F., Hatcher, R. L., Skjulsvik, T., Larsson, M. H., & Holmqvist, R. (2015b). Development and validation of a 6-item working alliance questionnaire for repeated administrations during psychotherapy. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Feeley, M., DeRubeis, R., & Gelfand, L. (1999). The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 578–582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fluckiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., Symonds, D., & Horvath, A. O. (2012). How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 10–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaston, L., Marmar, C. R., Gallagher, D., & Thompson, L. W. (1991). Alliance prediction of outcome beyond in-treatment symptomatic change as psychotherapy processes. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glickman, K., Shear, M. K., & Wall, M. M. (2016). Mediators of outcome in complicated grief treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22384.
  17. Guy, W. (1976). CGI clinical global impressions ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology (Revised). (pp. 217–222): National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  18. Horvath, A. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horvath, A., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horvath, A., Fluckiger, C., Del Re, A. C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansson, P., & Hoglend, P. (2007). Identifying mechanisms of change in psychotherapy: mediators of treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein, D. N., Schwartz, J. E., Santiago, N. J., Vivian, D., Vocisano, C., Castonguay, L. G., et al. (2003). Therapeutic alliance in depression treatment: controlling for prior change and patient characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(6), 997–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Krupnick, J. L., Sotsky, S. M., Simmens, S., Moyer, J., Elkin, I., Watkins, J., et al. (1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 532–539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenzo-Luacas, L., DeRubeis, R., & Webb, C. A. (2014). Client characteristics as moderators of the relation between the therapeutic alliance and outcome in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 362–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035994.Google Scholar
  26. Lorenzo-Luacas, L., German, R. E., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2015). It’s complicated: the relation between cognitive change procedures, cognitive change, and symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 41, 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markowitz, J. C., & Weissman, M. M. (2004). Interpersonal psychotherapy: principles and applications. World Psychiatry, 3(3), 136–139.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, M. K., & Greist, J. H. (2002). The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 461–464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy, R. (2009). How do psychological treatments work? Investigating mediators of change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(1), 1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ormhaug, S. M., Jensen, T. K., Wentzel-Larsen, T., & Shirk, S. R. (2014). The therapeutic alliance in treatment of traumatized youths: relation to outcome in a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 52–64.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Prigerson, H., Bierhals, A., Stanislav, K., Reynolds III, C., Shear, K., Day, N., et al. (1995). Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research, 59, 65–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosner, R., Pfoh, G., Kotoucova, M., & Hagl, M. (2014). Efficacy of an outpatient treatment for prolonged grief disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 167, 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shear, K. (2013). Complicated grief treatment: instructional manual for NIMH grants (introductory phase). New York: Center for Complicated Grief, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  34. Shear, K., Frank, E., Houck, P., & Reynolds III, C. (2005). Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 293(21), 2601–2608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Shear, M. K., Wang, Y., Skritskaya, N., Duan, N., Mauro, C., & Ghesquiere, A. (2014). Treatment of complicated grief in elderly persons: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(11), 1287–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Shear, M. K., Reynolds 3rd, C. F., Simon, N. M., Zisook, S., Wang, Y., Mauro, C., et al. (2016). Optimizing treatment of complicated grief: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(7), 685–694.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate : the evidence for what makes psychotherapy work ((Second edition. ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Zuroff, D., & Blatt, S. (2006). The therapeutic relationship in the brief treatment of depression: contributions to clinical improvement and enhanced adaptive capacities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 130–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Glickman
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Katherine Shear
    • 2
  • Melanie M. Wall
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences and Professional ProgramsYork College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Columbia University School of Social WorkColumbia University College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Division of Biostatistics in the Department of Psychiatry, Department of Biostatistics in the Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options