Clarifying the Role of the Socratic Method in CBT: a Survey of Expert Opinion
- 151 Downloads
The Socratic Method is widely described as an important component in the delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). However, there is a lack of clarity regarding the perceived role and importance of the Socratic Method in CBT. A brief questionnaire survey was completed by 15 expert CBT researchers to evaluate the perceived role and function of the Socratic Method in CBT. Survey responses were examined using thematic analysis. Results suggested that respondents believe that the Socratic Method has a number of benefits within CBT and that its effective application necessitates it being applied differentially across individuals and therapeutic tasks. A consensus was not reached amongst respondents regarding the role of the Socratic Method, with some responses describing it as a central feature of CBT whilst others identified it as a valuable adjunct to treatment which is nonessential. The implications of the findings and areas for future research are discussed.
KeywordsCognitive therapy/CBT Guided discovery Socratic dialogue Socratic questioning Socratic Method
We would like to thank the researchers who gave their valuable time to participate in the study: Professor David A. Clark, Professor Keith Dobson, Professor Paul Emmelkamp, Professor Mark Freeston, Dr. Nick Grey, Professor Steve Hollon, Dr. Warren Mansell, Professor Patricia van Oppen, Professor Adam Radomsky, Professor Ron Rapee, Professor Zindel Segal, Professor Roz Shafran, Dr. Craig Steel, Dr. Maureen Whittal and those who chose to participate anonymously.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of New England Human Research Ethics Committee. All participants chose to participate by responding to an invitation to participate. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study.
- Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research, National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf.
- Clark, D. M. (2005). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. Ray, W. R. Crozicr, & L. L. Alden (Eds.), The essential handbook of social anxiety for clinicians (pp. 193–218). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- DeRubeis, R. J., Webb, C. A., Tang, T. Z., & Beck, A. T. (2009). Cognitive therapy. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive– Behavioral therapies (3rd ed., pp. 277–316). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jorm, A. F. (2015). Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415600891.
- Kennerley, H. (2007). Socratic method. Oxford: Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Essential Guides.Google Scholar
- Muse, K., McManus, F. (2016). Expert insight into the assessment of competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy: a qualitative exploration of experts’ experiences, opinions and recommendations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 23(3), 246–259.Google Scholar
- Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism, guided discovery, and the Socratic method: Core processes for effective cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(1), 62–66.Google Scholar
- Padesky, C. A. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery. London: Paper presented at the A keynote address delivered at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies.Google Scholar
- Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2007). The competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for people with depression and with anxiety disorders. London: HMSO, Department of Health.Google Scholar
- Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women's body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 69–92.Google Scholar
- Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H., & Kirk, J. (2011). An introduction to cognitive behaviour therapy: Skills & applications. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Young, J., & Beck, A. (1980). Cognitive therapy scale: Rating manual. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar