International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 117–123 | Cite as

Inception of a Discovery: Re-defining the Use of Socratic Dialogue in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • Nikolaos KazantzisEmail author
  • Matthew E. Stuckey
Special Issue on Socratic Dialogue


Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was designed as a psychotherapy to support client ownership and self-confidence in the change process, not simply provide clients with the answers to their problems. In the first published guide for practice, Beck, Rush, Shaw, and Emery (Cognitive therapy of depression, New York: Guilford Press, 1974) described the therapeutic relationship as an environment where the therapist would exemplify the use of questioning to help evaluate the maladaptive beliefs and structures that lead to, or maintain, the client’s emotional distress. However, little research has been undertaken to examine the client’s adoption of self-questioning, or Socratic dialogue as relational process and intervention in CBT. This article presents an introduction to a special series in the International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, which aims to build upon previous efforts to unpack the complexities and nuances of Socratic dialogue in CBT by (a) compiling the most current expert opinion on the definition, role, and application of Socratic dialogue; (b) providing an account of key elements of the dialogue process; and (c) presenting the latest empirical examination of behavioral shaping as a potential mechanism underlying the change process during Socratic dialogue. In providing a greater conceptual understanding of contemporary issues and knowledge regarding core CBT processes, it is hoped that this special series will also encourage the practitioners to ask more questions of their own practice, as well as the gaps in the existing knowledge base, thereby widening the pathway for further scientific discoveries.


Cognitive behavioral therapy Socratic dialogue Socratic questioning Review 


  1. Aviram, A., & Westra, H. A. (2011). The impact of motivational interviewing on resistance in cognitive behavioural therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 698–708. Scholar
  2. Barber, J. P., Liese, B. S., & Abrams, M. J. (2003). Development of the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale. Psychotherapy Research, 13, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Bullis, J. R., Gallagher, M. W., Murray-Latin, H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Bentley, K. H., Thompson-Hollands, J., Conklin, L. R., Boswell, J. F., Ametaj, A., Carl, J. R., Boettcher, H. T., & Cassiello-Robbins, C. (2017). The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders compared with diagnosis-specific protocols for anxiety disorders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(9), 875–884. Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., & Bredemeier, K. (2016). A unified model of depression: integrating clinical, cognitive, biological, and evolutionary perspectives. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 596–619. Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn, I. M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Standart, S., Garland, A., & Reichelt, F. K. (2001). The revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun, J. D., Strunk, D. R., Sasso, K. E., & Cooper, A. A. (2015). Therapist use of Socratic questioning predicts session-to-session symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 70, 32–37. Scholar
  8. Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2004). What is Socratic questioning? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41(3), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, J. D., McIntosh, V. V., Jordan, J., Porter, R. J., Frampton, C. M., & Joyce, P. R. (2013). Psychotherapy for depression: a randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy and cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151, 500–505. Scholar
  10. Clark, G., & Egan, S. (2015). The Socratic method in cognitive behavioural therapy: a narrative review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(6), 863–879. Scholar
  11. Clark & Egan (2018) Clarifying the role of the Socratic Method in CBT: a survey of expert opinion.Google Scholar
  12. Discover [Def 1]. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster online. Retrieved February 1, 2018, from
  13. Ellis, A. (1971). Growth through reason. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  14. Fluckiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., Symonds, D., & Horvath, A. O. (2012). How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 10–17. Scholar
  15. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2011). Study of the Socratic method during cognitive restructuring. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Froján Parga et al. (2018). Verbal change and cognitive change: conceptual and methodological analysis for the study of cognitive restructuring using the Socratic dialogue.Google Scholar
  17. Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory: a new psychology of personal freedom. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2017). The third wave of CBT and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry, 16, 245–246. Scholar
  19. Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT: the science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  20. Heiniger, L. E., Clark, G. I., & Egan, S. J. (2018). Perceptions of Socratic and non-Socratic presentation of information in cognitive behaviour therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 58, 106–113. Scholar
  21. Inception. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster online. Retrieved February 1, 2018, from
  22. Kazantzis, N. (2003). Therapist competence in cognitive and behaviour therapies: review of the contemporary empirical evidence. Behaviour Change, 20, 1–12.
  23. Kazantzis, N. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on processes of cognitive behavioral therapy: does “necessary, but not sufficient” still capture it? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(2), 115–120. Scholar
  24. Kazantzis, N., Fairburn, C. G., Padesky, C. A., Reinecke, M., & Teeson, M. (2014). Unresolved issues regarding the research and practice of cognitive behavior therapy: the case of guided discovery using Socratic questioning. Behav Chang, 31, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazantzis, N., Cronin, T. J., Norton, P. J., Lai, J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2015). Reservations about the conclusions of the Interdivisional (APA Divisions 12 & 29) Task Force on Evidence-Based Therapy Relationships: what do we know, what don’t we know? J Clin Psychol, 71, 423–427. Scholar
  26. Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). The therapeutic relationship in cognitive behavior therapy: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Kazantzis, N., Beck, J. S., Clark, D. A., Dobson, K. S., Hofmann, S. G., Leahy, R. L., & Wong, W. C. (2018a). Socratic dialogue and guided discovery in cognitive behavioral therapy: a modified Delphi panel. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy.Google Scholar
  28. Kazantzis, N., Luong, H. K., Usatoff, A. S., Impala, T., Yew, R. Y., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018b). The processes of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  29. Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., McGinn, L., Newman, C., Persons, J. B., & Radomsky, A. (2018c). Defining the role and function of the therapeutic relationship in cognitive behavioral therapy: a modified Delphi panel (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Lorenzo-Luaces, L., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2018). Miles to go before we sleep: advancing the understanding of psychotherapy by modeling complex processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(2), 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lorenzo-Luaces, L., German, R. E., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2015). It’s complicated: the relation between cognitive change procedures, cognitive change, and symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Clin Psychol Rev, 41, 3–15. Scholar
  32. Muse, K., & McManus, F. (2013). A systematic review of methods for assessing competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy. Clin Psychol Rev, 33, 484–499. Scholar
  33. Overholser (2018) Guided discovery: a clinical strategy derived from the Socratic method.Google Scholar
  34. Padesky, C. A. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery? London: Keynote address to European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies.Google Scholar
  35. Petrik, A. M., Kazantzis, N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Distinguishing integrative from eclectic practice in cognitive behavioral therapies. Psychotherapy, 50(3), 392–397. Scholar
  36. Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Psychotherapy, 48(1), 80–87. Scholar
  37. Schoenwald, S. K., & Garland, A. F. (2013). A review of treatment adherence measurement methods. Psychological Assessment, 25, 146–156. Scholar
  38. Tryon, G. S., & Winograd, G. (2011). Goal consensus and collaboration. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 50–57. Scholar
  39. Young, J. E., & Beck, A. T. (1980). Cognitive Therapy Scale: Rating manual. Unpublished manuscript. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cognitive Behavior Therapy Research UnitMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Cognitive Behavior Therapy Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical NeurosciencesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations