Socratic Dialogue and Guided Discovery in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Modified Delphi Panel
Published guides for the practice of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) include a range of recommendations for the use of Socratic dialogue (or Socratic questioning) and guided discovery. While it is accepted that a specific dialogue process can be useful to support the way a therapist develops a cognitive case conceptualization (or case formulation), structures a session, or uses techniques, the stylistic aspects of Socratic dialogue remain unclear. In particular, the role of collaboration in the dialogue process has not been clearly articulated in the literature to date. Reaching expert consensus on the ideal conditions for the use of Socratic dialogue can guide further empirical study, including the design of a much needed complete and accurate assessment of therapist skill in its use. This article summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of a second expert panel on these specific features of Socratic dialogue in order to guide further empirical study.
KeywordsCognitive behavioral therapy Socratic dialogue Socratic questioning Delphi panel
- Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Castonguay, L. G., & Beutler, L. E. (2006). Common and unique principles of therapeutic change: what do we know and what do we need to know? In L. G. Castonguay & L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Principles of therapeutic change that work (pp. 353–369). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2011). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: science and practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Dobson, D., & Dobson, K. S. (2016). Evidence-based practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT: the science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. New Harbinger: Oakland CA.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, S. G. (2011). An introduction to modern CBT: psychological solutions to mental health problems. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Heyes, M. E., Schnitzen, L., et al. (2018). Recertification and reentry to practice for nurse anesthetists: determining core competencies and evaluating performance via high-fidelity simulation technology. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 8(4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30181-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). The therapeutic relationship in cognitive behavior therapy: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Leahy, R. L. (2017). Cognitive therapy techniques: a practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Padesky, C. A. (1993). Socratic questioning: changing minds or guiding discovery? Keynote address to European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies, London.Google Scholar
- Petersen, R. C., Lopez, O., et al. (2018). Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 90(3), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petrik, A. M., Kazantzis, N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Distinguishing integrative from eclectic practice in cognitive behavioral therapies. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 50(3), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032412.
- Stuckey, M. E., & Kazantzis, N. (2018). How can we reconcile the relational and technique functions of Socratic dialogue in CBT for depression? A review. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar