Advertisement

Aerosol Science and Engineering

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 130–140 | Cite as

Emission Characteristics of PM2.5 and Trace Gases from Household Wood Burning in Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China

  • Yong Zhang
  • Jie Tian
  • Zhenxing Shen
  • Wenjie Wang
  • Haiyan Ni
  • Suixin Liu
  • Junji CaoEmail author
Original Paper
  • 316 Downloads

Abstract

Considering woods used as the primary fuel in the countryside of Guanzhong Plain and its emission impacts on environment and human health. Five kinds of common wood fuels (Persimmon tree, Pear tree, Apple tree, Jujube, and Peach) were collected and burned in a laboratory combustion chamber with a common stove to identify emission characteristics of PM2.5 and trace gases (i.e., CO2, CO, NOx, and SO2). The average EFs of wood burning were estimated to be 1401 ± 71 g kg−1 for CO2, 53.48 ± 11.83 g kg−1 for CO, 1.48 ± 0.54 g kg−1 for NOx, 0.53 ± 0.19 g kg−1 for SO2, and 3.01 ± 0.72 g kg−1 for PM2.5, respectively. PM2.5 mass reconstruction for the five tree samples demonstrated excellent results, ranged from 80.7 to 98.4%. OC, EC, and water-soluble ions (sum of Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, SO42−, NO3, and Cl) are major constituents of PM2.5, accounting for average abundance of 29.86 ± 2.03, 15.65 ± 1.07, and 17.51 ± 6.24% of the mass, respectively. The average EFs of OC and EC in PM2.5 were 910 ± 279 mg kg−1 and 465 ± 279 mg kg−1, and EC1 was the dominant carbon fraction with average abundance of 44 ± 3% of total carbon. Sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and chloride (Cl) were the dominant water-soluble ions, with average abundance of 4.69 ± 2.51, 3.81 ± 2.13, and 3.30 ± 2.45% of PM2.5 mass. Similarity measures (i.e., Student’s t test, coefficient of divergence) showed that the five profiles derived in this study were similar for the species measured, which indicates that those profiles could be replaced by each other for PM2.5 source apportionment. Finally, the emission of woods burning in Guanzhong Plain was estimated. The total emission in 2016 was 14,924.6 Gg for CO2, 569.9 Gg for CO, 15.8 Gg for NOx, 5.6 Gg for SO2, and 32.1 Gg for PM2.5, respectively.

Keywords

Source profiles Emission factors PM2.5 Wood burning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (2013FY112700) and the Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Supplementary material

41810_2018_30_MOESM1_ESM.docx (101 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 100 kb)

References

  1. Aiken AC et al (2008) O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 42:4478–4485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akagi SK et al (2011) Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmos Chem Phys 11:4039–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreae MO, Merlet P (2001) Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandowe BA, Meusel H, Huang RJ, Ho K, Cao J, Hoffmann T, Wilcke W (2014) PM2.5-bound oxygenated PAHs, nitro-PAHs and parent-PAHs from the atmosphere of a Chinese megacity: seasonal variation, sources and cancer risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 473–474:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booth BB, Dunstone NJ, Halloran PR, Andrews T, Bellouin N (2012) Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability. Nature 484:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brassard P, Palacios JH, Godbout S, Bussieres D, Lagace R, Larouche JP, Pelletier F (2014) Comparison of the gaseous and particulate matter emissions from the combustion of agricultural and forest biomasses. Bioresour Technol 155:300–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo AI et al (2015) Residential wood combustion in two domestic devices: relationship of different parameters throughout the combustion cycle. Atmos Environ 116:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao JJ et al (2005) Characterization of airborne carbonate over a site near Asian dust source regions during spring 2002 and its climatic and environmental significance. J Geophys Res Atmos 110(D03203):1–8Google Scholar
  9. Cao JJ, Lee SC, Ho KF, Fung K, Chow JC, Watson JG (2006) Characterization of roadside fine particulate carbon and its eight fractions in Hong Kong. Aerosol Air Qual Res 6:106–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao JJ et al (2008) Size-differentiated source profiles for fugitive dust in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Atmos Environ 42:2261–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cereceda-Balic F, Toledo M, Vidal V, Guerrero F, Diaz-Robles LA, Petit-Breuilh X, Lapuerta M (2017) Emission factors for PM2.5, CO, CO2, NOx, SO2 and particle size distributions from the combustion of wood species using a new controlled combustion chamber 3CE. Sci Total Environ 584–585:901–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandrasekaran SR, Hopke PK, Rector L, Allen G, Lin L (2012) Chemical composition of wood chips and wood pellets. Energy Fuels 26:4932–4937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen LWA, Verburg P, Shackelford A, Zhu D, Susfalk R, Chow JC, Watson JG (2010) Moisture effects on carbon and nitrogen emission from burning of wildland biomass. Atmos Chem Phys 10:6617–6625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Tian C, Feng Y, Zhi G, Li J, Zhang G (2015) Measurements of emission factors of PM2.5, OC, EC, and BC for household stoves of coal combustion in China. Atmos Environ 109:190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chow JC, Watson JG, Pritchett LC, Pierson WR, Frazier CA, Purcell RG (1993) The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in US air quality studies. Atmos Environ 27(A):1185–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chow JC, Watson JG, Crow D, Lowenthal DH, Merrifield T (2001) Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci Tech 34:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chow JC, Watson JG, Ashbaugh LL, Magliano KL (2003) Similarities and differences in PM10 chemical source profiles for geological dust from the San Joaquin Valley, California. Atmos Environ 37:1317–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chow JC et al (2004) Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. Chemosphere 54:185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chow JC, Watson JG, Chen LW, Chang MC, Robinson NF, Trimble D, Kohl S (2007) The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 57:1014–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chow JC, Lowenthal DH, Chen LW, Wang X, Watson JG (2015) Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cui M, Chen Y, Tian C, Zhang F, Yan C, Zheng M (2016) Chemical composition of PM2.5 from two tunnels with different vehicular fleet characteristics. Sci Total Environ 550:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duan XL et al (2014) Household fuel use for cooking and heating in China: results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS). Appl Energy 136:692–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (2002) Organic compounds in biomass smoke from residential wood combustion: emissions characterization at a continental scale. J Geophys Res Atmos.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000661 Google Scholar
  24. Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (2004) Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from the wood stove combustion of prevalent United States tree species. Environ Eng Sci 21:705–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillies JA, Gertler AW (2011) Comparison and evaluation of chemically speciated mobile source PM2.5 particulate matter profiles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:1459–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gonçalves C et al (2010) Characterisation of PM10 emissions from woodstove combustion of common woods grown in Portugal. Atmos Environ 44:4474–4480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonçalves C, Alves C, Pio C (2012) Inventory of fine particulate organic compound emissions from residential wood combustion in Portugal. Atmos Environ 50:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Han YM, Cao JJ, Lee SC, Ho KF, An ZS (2010) Different characteristics of char and soot in the atmosphere and their ratio as an indicator for source identification in Xi’an, China. Atmos Chem Phys 10:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henry RC (1992) Dealing with near collinearity in chemical mass balance receptor models. Atmos Environ 26(A):933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hosseini S et al (2013) Laboratory characterization of PM emissions from combustion of wildland biomass fuels. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:9914–9929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang X, Li MM, Li JF, Song Y (2012) A high-resolution emission inventory of crop burning in fields in China based on MODIS Thermal Anomalies/Fire products. Atmos Environ 50:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang RJ et al (2014) High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 514:218–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klason T, Bai XS (2007) Computational study of the combustion process and NO formation in a small-scale wood pellet furnace. Fuel 86:1465–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin EJT et al (2010) Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME). J Geophys Res Atmos 115:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li X, Wang S, Duan L, Hao J, Li C, Chen Y, Yang L (2007) Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and corn stover in China. Environ Sci Technol 41:6052–6058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li X, Wang S, Duan L, Hao J, Nie Y (2009) Carbonaceous aerosol emissions from household biofuel combustion in China. Environ Sci Technol 43:6076–6081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lim SS et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2224–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu L et al (2017) Morphology, composition, and mixing state of primary particles from combustion sources-crop residue, wood, and solid waste. Sci Rep 7:5047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowenthal DH, Chow JC, Watson JG, Neuroth GR, Robbins RB, Shafritz BP, Countess RJ (1992) The effects of collinearity on the ability to determine aerosol contributions from diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles using the chemical mass balance model. Atmos Environ 26(A):2341–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald JD, Zielinska B, Fujita EM, Sagebiel JC, Chow JC, Watson JG (2000) Fine particle and gaseous emission rates from residential wood combustion. Environ Sci Technol 34:2080–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McMeeking GR et al (2009) Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory. J Geophys Res Atmos 114(D19210):1–20Google Scholar
  43. McNamara M, Thornburg J, Semmens E, Ward T, Noonan C (2013) Coarse particulate matter and airborne endotoxin within wood stove homes. Indoor Air 23:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohr C et al (2013) Contribution of nitrated phenols to wood burning brown carbon light absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during winter time. Environ Sci Technol 47:6316–6324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (2000) China’s fifth population census. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/renkoupucha/2000fenxian/fenxian.htm
  46. Ni HY et al (2015) Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China. Atmos Environ 123:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ni HY et al (2017) PM2.5 emissions and source profiles from open burning of crop residues. Atmos Environ 169:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niu XY et al (2016) PM2.5 from the Guanzhong Plain: chemical composition and implications for emission reductions. Atmos Environ 147:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nyström R, Lindgren R, Avagyan R, Westerholm R, Lundstedt S, Boman C (2017) Influence of wood species and burning conditions on particle emission characteristics in a residential wood stove. Energy Fuels 31:5514–5524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olave RJ, Forbes EGA, Johnston CR, Relf J (2017) Particulate and gaseous emissions from different wood fuels during combustion in a small-scale biomass heating system. Atmos Environ 157:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orasche J, Seidel T, Hartmann H, Schnelle-Kreis J, Chow JC, Ruppert H, Zimmermann R (2012) Comparison of emissions from wood combustion. Part 1: emission factors and characteristics from different small-scale residential heating appliances considering particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-related toxicological potential of particle-bound organic species. Energy Fuels 26:6695–6704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poschl U (2005) Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects. Angew Chem 44:7520–7540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reid JS, Koppmann R, Eck TF, Eleuterio DP (2005) A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass burning particles. Atmos Chem Phys 5:799–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ribeiro JP, Vicente ED, Alves C, Querol X, Amato F, Tarelho LA (2017) Characteristics of ash and particle emissions during bubbling fluidised bed combustion of three types of residual forest biomass. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:10018–10029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sahu M, Hu S, Ryan PH, Le Masters G, Grinshpun SA, Chow JC, Biswas P (2011) Chemical compositions and source identification of PM2.5 aerosols for estimation of a diesel source surrogate. Sci Total Environ 409:2642–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmidl C et al (2008) Chemical characterisation of fine particle emissions from wood stove combustion of common woods growing in mid-European Alpine regions. Atmos Environ 42:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics (2017) Shaanxi statistical yearbook—2017. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  58. Shen G et al (2012) Retene emission from residential solid fuels in China and evaluation of retene as a unique marker for soft wood combustion. Environ Sci Technol 46:4666–4672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shen GF et al (2013) Influence of fuel moisture, charge size, feeding rate and air ventilation conditions on the emissions of PM, OC, EC, parent PAHs, and their derivatives from residential wood combustion. J Environ Sci China 25:1808–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shen G et al (2015) Pollutant emissions from improved coal- and wood-fuelled cookstoves in rural households. Environ Sci Technol 49:6590–6598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sophie B et al (2013) Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980–2010. Environ Health Perspect 121:784–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Srinivas B, Sarin MM (2014) PM2.5, EC and OC in atmospheric outflow from the Indo-Gangetic Plain: temporal variability and aerosol organic carbon-to-organic mass conversion factor. Sci Total Environ 487:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevens B, Feingold G (2009) Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system. Nature 461:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Streets DG, Yarber KF, Woo JH, Carmichael GR (2003) Biomass burning in Asia: annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17:1759–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sun J et al (2017) Particulate matters emitted from maize straw burning for winter heating in rural areas in Guanzhong Plain, China: current emission and future reduction. Atmos Res 184:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tian J et al (2015) A biomass combustion chamber: design, evaluation, and a case study of wheat straw combustion emission tests. Aerosol Air Qual Res 15:2104–2114.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.03.0167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tissari J et al (2008) Fine particle and gaseous emissions from normal and smouldering wood combustion in a conventional masonry heater. Atmos Environ 42:7862–7873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turn SQ, Jenkins BM, Chow JC, Pritchett LC, Campbell D, Cahill T, Whalen SA (1997) Elemental characterization of particulate matter emitted from biomass burning: wind tunnel derived source profiles for herbaceous and wood fuels. J Geophys Res Atmos 102:3683–3699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watson JG, Chow JC, Houck JE (2001) PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemosphere 43:1141–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. WHO (2014) ZH factsheet 292: household air pollution and health. http://www.portal.pmnch.org/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/
  71. Wilnhammer M, Wittkopf S, Richter K, Weber-Blaschke G (2017) The impact of a new emission control act on particulate matter emissions from residential wood energy use in Bavaria, Germany. J Clean Prod 145:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xu HM et al (2012) Lead concentrations in fine particulate matter after the phasing out of leaded gasoline in Xi’an, China. Atmos Environ 46:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yan XY, Ohara T, Akimoto H (2006) Bottom-up estimate of biomass burning in mainland China. Atmos Environ 40:5262–5273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang HF et al (2012) Chemical and size characterization of particles emitted from the burning of coal and wood in rural households in Guizhou, China. Atmos Environ 51:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang Q et al (2014) Chemical profiles of urban fugitive dust over Xi’an in the south margin of the Loess Plateau, China. Atmos Pollut Res 5:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhi G et al (2008) Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles from various residential coal-stoves in China. Environ Sci Technol 42:3310–3315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, Institute of Earth EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  5. 5.Institute of Global Environmental ChangeXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations