Advertisement

Cultural models of society in Western Ukraine

  • Nadiia Biletska
Research Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Ukraine’s democratization that started after the disintegration of the Soviet Union is an ongoing effort, accompanied by incremental political, social, and ideological transformations as well as tumultuous events—the Orange Revolution (2004–2005), growing authoritarianism during the presidency of Yanukovych (2010–2014), the Revolution of Dignity (2013–2014), Russian annexation of Crimea (2014), and Russia’s ongoing military aggression in Eastern Ukraine (2014-present). This study is concerned not with the actual political and social transformations in the country, but with mental representations of society that these transformations generated. The cultural models theory and method offered a toolkit for examining people’s implicit ideas and taken-for-granted assumptions through the analysis of spoken discourse. I conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with people in Western Ukraine, identified recurrent ideas and conceptual metaphors in the interviewees’ discourses, and propose three cultural models of society underlying them.

Keywords

Cultural models Western Ukraine Conceptual metaphors Discourse analysis 

Notes

References

  1. Bekeshkina, I. (2017). Decisive 2014: Did it divide or unite Ukraine. In O. Haran & M. Yakovlyev (Eds.), Constructing a political nation: Changes in the attitudes of Ukrainians during the war in the Donbas (pp. 1–35). Kyiv: Stylos Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bennardo, G. (2009). Language, space, and social relationships: A foundational cultural model in Polynesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennardo, G., & de Munck, V. C. (2014). Cultural models: Genesis, methods, and experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Studies in applied linguistics: Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign Policy by Metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 37–60). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Cleary, L. (2016). Half measures and incomplete reforms: The breeding ground for a hybrid civil society in Ukraine. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Czaplicka, J. (2005). Introduction. In J. Czaplicka (Ed.), Lviv, Lemberg, Leopolis, Lwów, Lvov: A city at the crosscurrents of culture (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. D’Andrade, R. (2005). Some methods for studying cultural cognitive structures. In N. Quinn (Ed.), Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods (pp. 36–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freedom House. (2011). Ukraine: Status change explanation. In Freedom in the world. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2011/ukraine. Accessed 21 Sept 2019.
  11. Gatewood, J. B. (2012). Cultural models, consensus analysis, and the social organization of knowledge. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(3), 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goatley, A. (2007). Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Handwerker, W. P. (2011). How to collect data that warrant analysis. In D. B. Kronenfeld, G. Bennardo, V. C. de Munck, & M. D. Fischer (Eds.), A companion to cognitive anthropology (pp. 117–130). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Hrytsak, Y. (2005). Lviv: A multicultural history through centuries. In J. Czaplicka (Ed.), Lviv: A city in the crosscurrents of culture (pp. 47–74). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Orthony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Berkeley: UC Berkeley Previously Published Works.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lakoff, G., Esperson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). Master metaphor list. Berkeley: Cognitive, Linguistic Group.Google Scholar
  18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: Method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol., 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–94). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Quinn, N. (2005). Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (1987). Culture and Cognition. In N. Quinn & D. Holland (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross, N. (2004). Culture and cognition: Implications for theory and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Shore, B. (1998). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Steen, G. (2007). Finding metaphor in discourse: Pragglejaz and beyond. Culture, Language and Representation, 5, 9–25.Google Scholar
  26. Strauss, C. (1997). Research on cultural discontinuities. In C. Strauss & N. Quinn (Eds.), A cognitive theory of cultural meaning (pp. 210–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Strauss, C. (2012). Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strauss, C. (2018). The complexity of culture in persons. In N. Quinn (Ed.), Advances in culture theory from psychological anthropology (pp. 109–130). New York: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sydorchuk, O., Hanushchak, Y., & Umland, A. (2017, April 8). “Nerozkazana reforma [The Untold Reform]”, Kyiv: Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives foundation. Retrieved from http://dif.org.ua/article/nerozkazana-reforma. Accessed 21 Sept 2019.
  30. Sydorchuk, O., & Haran, O. (2018). Ukraine after Euromaidan: Increased pluralism amid patronal politics. In M. Solska, F. Bieber, & D. Taleski (Eds.), Illiberal and authoritarian tendencies in Central, Southeastern and Eastern (pp. 257–273). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. TI (Transparency International). (2011). Corruption perceptions index 2011. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2011/interactive.
  32. TI (Transparency International). (2017). Presentation of transparency rating of Ukrainian Cities: Lviv is leading. Retrieved from https://ti-ukraine.org/en/news/presentation-of-transparency-rating-of-ukrainian-cities-lviv-is-leading-announcement/.
  33. Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LvivUkraine

Personalised recommendations