Studies on Formulation and Properties of Fruit Peel Waste Incorporated Edible Film and its Effect on Quality of Bread

  • Abinaya VenkateshEmail author
  • Harin Sutariya
Research Article


Management and the utilization of fruit processing waste are the major concern for food industries. In fruits, the more part is occupied by peels which are discarded as a waste material that has various health benefits. The current study is to prepare an edible film by utilizing the pomegranate peel (PMP) and orange peel (OP). The PMP and OP based film was prepared by incorporating three different concentrations of glycerol (20%, 25% and 30%, w/w) and studied its effects on film properties and from the result, 20% glycerol was selected as the best one. The five edible films were prepared with differing proportions of PMP and OP in the ratio of 0:1 (Film A), 1:3 (Film B), 1:1 (Film C), 3:1 (Film D) and 1:0 (Film E) along with the addition of 20% of glycerol and studied its properties. However, among all the blended proportions, film B prepared with 1:3 (PMP:OP) showed better characteristics in film properties. The quality of bread sample wrapped with the selected film was studied for a period of 5 days. The PMP and OP based film was successful in lowering weight loss and reduction in total bacterial count from bread sample. 


Pomegranate peel (PMP) Orange peel (OP) Edible film Glycerol Bread Packaging material 



The authors are thankful to Director, School of Engineering and Technology, Jain University Bengaluru (India) for providing necessary research facilities and infra-structure to complete the work.


  1. 1.
    Tharanathan RN (2003) Biodegradable films and composite coatings: past, present and future. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:71–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otoni CG, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Azeredo H, Lorevice MV, Moura MR, Mattoso LH, McHugh TH (2017) Recent advances on edible films based on fruits and vegetables—a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16:1151–1169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jo C, Kang H, Lee NY, Kwon JH, Byun MW (2005) Pectin-and gelatin-based film: effect of gamma irradiation on the mechanical properties and biodegradation. Radiat Phys Chem 72:745–750. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrix KM, Morra MJ, Lee HB, Min SC (2012) Defatted mustard seed meal-based biopolymer film development. Food Hydrocolloids 26:118–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borah PP, Das P, Badwaik LS (2017) Ultrasound treated potato peel and sweet lime pomace-based biopolymer film development. Ultrasonicssonochemistry 36:11–19. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ismail T, Sestili P, Akhtar S (2012) Pomegranate peel and fruit extracts: a review of potential anti-inflammatory and anti-infective effects. J Ethnopharmacol 143:397–405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akhtar S, Ismail T, Fraternale D, Sestili P (2015) Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: chemistry and food features. Food Chem 174:417–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuan G, Lv H, Zhang Y, Sun H, Chen X (2016) Combined effect of cinnamon essential oil and pomegranate peel extract on antioxidant, antibacterial and physical properties of chitosan films. Food Sci Technol Res 22:291–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larrauri JA, Rupbrez P, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F (1996) High dietary fibre peels: associated powders from orange and lime polyphenols and antioxidant capacity. Food Res Int 29:751–762. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mathur A, Verma SK, Purohit R, Gupta V, Dua VK, Prasad GBKS, Mathur D, Singh SK, Singh S (2011) Evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of peel and pulp of some citrus fruits. J Biotechnol Biotherap 1:1–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghasemi K, Ghasemi Y, Ebrahimzadeh MA (2009) Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues. Pak J Pharm Sci 22:277–281Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sundarraj AA, Ranganathan TV (2017) A review-pectin from agro and industrial waste. Int J Appl Environ Sci 12:1777–1801Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang HJ, Min SC (2010) Potato peel-based biopolymer film development using high-pressure homogenization, irradiation, and ultrasound. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:903–909. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banerjee J, Singh R, Vijayaraghavan R, MacFarlane D, Patti AF, Arora A (2017) Bioactives from fruit processing wastes: green approaches to valuable chemicals. Food Chem 225:10–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yadav SR, Khan Z, Kunjwani S, Mular S (2015) Extraction and characterization of pectin from different fruits. Int J Appl Res 1:91–94Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farahnaky A, Saberi B, Majzoobi M (2013) Effect of glycerol on physical and mechanical properties of wheat starch edible films. J Texture Stud 44:176–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jouki M, Yazdi FT, Mortazavi SA, Koocheki A (2013) Physical, barrier and antioxidant properties of a novel plasticized edible film from quince seed mucilage. Int J Biol Macromol 62:500–507. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perez LM, Piccirilli GN, Delorenzi NJ, Verdini RA (2016) Effect of different combinations of glycerol and/or trehalose on physical and structural properties of whey protein concentrate-based edible films. Food Hydrocolloids 56:352–359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yam KL, Papadakis SE (2004) A simple digital imaging method for measuring and analyzing color of food surfaces. J Food Eng 61:137–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siripatrawan U, Harte BR (2010) Physical properties and antioxidant activity of an active film from chitosan incorporated with green tea extract. Food Hydrocolloids 24:770–775. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adilah AN, Jamilah B, Noranizan MA, Hanani ZN (2018) Utilization of mango peel extracts on the biodegradable films for active packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 16:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garg N, Garg KL, Mukerji KG (2010) Laboratory manual of food microbiology. IK International Pvt Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tee YB, Wong J, Tan MC, Talib RA (2016) Development of edible film from flaxseed mucilage. Bio Resour 11:10286–10295Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prodpran T, Chuaynukul K, Nagarajan M, Benjakul S, Prasarpran S (2017) Impacts of plasticizer and pre-heating conditions on properties of bovine and fish gelatin films fabricated by thermo-compression molding technique. Ital J Food Sci 29:487–504. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leceta I, Guerrero P, De la Caba K (2013) Functional properties of chitosan-based films. Carbohyd Polym 93:339–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dick M, Costa TMH, Gomaa A, Subirade M, de Oliveira Rios A, Flores SH (2015) Edible film production from chia seed mucilage: effect of glycerol concentration on its physicochemical and mechanical properties. Carbohyd Polym 130:198–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arvanitoyannis I, Biliaderis CG (1999) Physical properties of polyol-plasticized edible blends made of methyl cellulose and soluble starch. Carbohyd Polym 38:47–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perez-Gago MB, Nadaud P, Krochta JM (1999) Water vapor permeability, solubility, and tensile properties of heat-denatured versus native whey protein films. J Food Sci 64:1034–1037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maran JP, Sivakumar V, Sridhar R, Thirugnanasambandham K (2013) Development of model for barrier and optical properties of tapioca starch based edible films. Carbohyd Polym 92:1335–1347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cabello SP, Takara EA, Marchese J, Ochoa NA (2015) Influence of plasticizers in pectin films: microstructural changes. Mater Chem Phys 162:491–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saberi B, Chockchaisawasdee S, Golding JB, Scarlett CJ, Stathopoulos CE (2017) Physical and mechanical properties of a new edible film made of pea starch and guar gum as affected by glycols, sugars and polyols. Int J Biol Macromol 104:345–359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Das P, Borah PP, Badwaik LS (2018) Transformation of chicken feather keratin and pomelo peel pectin into biodegradable composite film. J Polym Environ 26:2120–2129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ullah N, Ali J, Khan FA, Khurram M, Hussain A, Rahman IU (2012) Proximate composition, minerals content, antibacterial and antifungal activity evaluation of pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) peels powder. Middle East J Sci Res 11:396–401Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M’hiri N, Ioannou I, Ghoul M, Boudhrioua NM (2015) Proximate chemical composition of orange peel and variation of phenols and antioxidant activity during convective air drying. J New Sci 9:881–890Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Indrarti L, Indriyati (2017) Incorporation of citrus essential oils into bacterial cellulose-based edible films and assessment of their physical properties. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 60:012018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kang HJ, Jo C, Lee NY, Kwon JH, Byun MW (2005) A combination of gamma irradiation and CaCl2 immersion forapectin-based biodegradable film. Carbohyd Polym 60:547–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pavlath AE, Voisin A, Robertson GH (1999) Pectin-based biodegradable water insoluble films. Macromol Symp 140:107–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pitak N, Rakshit SK (2011) Physical and antimicrobial properties of banana flour/chitosan biodegradable and self-sealing films used for preserving fresh-cut vegetables. LWT Food Sci Technol 44:2310–2315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rosas-BurgosEC Burgos-Hernandez A, Noguera-Artiaga L, Kacaniova M, Hernandez-García F, Cárdenas-Lopez JL, Carbonell-Barrachina AA (2017) Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate peel extracts as affected by cultivar. J Sci Food Agric 97:802–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Packaging 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food TechnologySET, Jain UniversityBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations