Advertisement

Enhancing mechanical endurance of chemical-tempered thin soda-lime silicate float glass by ion exchange

  • Aydın Süleyman Güzel
  • Meryem Sarıgüzel
  • Melis Can Özdemir Yanık
  • Esin Günay
  • Metin Usta
  • Yusuf ÖztürkEmail author
Research
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the mechanical properties differences in between the air and tin surfaces of thin soda-lime silicate float glasses that subjected to ion exchange using KNO3 salt bath. The ion exchange process was carried out at different times and temperatures. Chemically tempered glasses were investigated by means of compressive stress (CS), microhardness measurements, cracking probability, fractographic analysis, and flexural strength. The relationship among these properties was also discussed. The Weibull distributions of the samples were determined for a better understanding of the strength results. The AFM was used to determine the surface roughness. The weight of glass samples was increased gradually with increasing ion exchange time and temperature due to the inter-diffusion of K+–Na+ ions. The fracture load of chemically strengthened glass with ion exchange at 435 °C-8 h showed an increase of ~ 4.4 times that of untreated glass (raw glass), and it was selected as the optimum process conditions. The number of broken pieces was increased by increasing flexural strength, and smaller pieces were obtained with a great deal of branching. The air side always has greater compressive stress than the tin side. The maximum hardness value was reached with ion exchange at 435 °C for 12 h on a tin surface was 8.25 GPa with an increase of ~ 18% with respect to the raw glass. The crack resistance of chemically tempered glasses showed an increase in the range of 410–1290% and 241–1895% for air and tin surfaces, respectively. According to the AFM analysis, surface roughness of the samples after ion exchange did not change dramatically. SEM-EDS analysis revealed that the surface potassium concentration and diffusion depth increase with temperature.

Keywords

Chemical tempering Ion exchange Soda-lime float glass Mechanical strength Indentation Compressive stress 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Bilal ALCAN for his contributions to the experimental studies from the TUBITAK Marmara Research Center Materials Institute. The authors are thankful to ŞİŞECAM Science and Technology Center.

Funding information

The authors of this study are grateful to the Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for the financial support under the project entitled and numbered as “Third-Generation Glass Toughening: Ultra Strong Sheet Glass For Large-Area Applications Through Super-Efficient Side-Selective Ion Exchange-215M127.”

References

  1. 1.
    Ultra-Thin Glass Market - Forecast to 2022, Market Report. https://www.researchandexperts.com/report/01L7-CH5730/ultra-thin-glass-market-forecast-to-2022/ (2017). Accessed 22 December 2017
  2. 2.
    Gy, R.: Ion exchange for glass strengthening. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 149(2), 159–165 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karlsson, S., Jonson, B., Stålhandske, C.: The technology of chemical glass strengthening–a review. Glass Technol. Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. Part A. 51(2), 41–54 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varshneya, A.K.: Chemical strengthening of glass: lessons learned and yet to be learned. Int. J. Appl. Glas. Sci. 1(2), 131–142 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    (Anonymous): Corning’ Gorilla Glass brings King Kong glass strength to high-tech toys. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 89, 41–42 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geithe, A.: Touching allowed. Schott Technol. Mag. Sol. 28–29 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nippon Electric Glass has started mass-producing specialty glass for chemical strengthening, which is used for cover glass of smart phones and mobile devices, Press release. http://www.neg.co.jp/uploads/sites/2/news_20110418_en.pdf (2011). Accessed 24 April 2018
  8. 8.
    Jacoby, M.: New applications for glass emerge. Chem. Eng. News. 90(25), 34–36 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varshneya, A.K.: Fundamentals of inorganic glasses. Elsevier (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leboeuf, V., Blondeau, J.-P., De Sousa Meneses, D., Véron, O.: Potassium ionic exchange in glasses for mechanical property improvement. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 377, 60–65 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyagi, V., Varshneya, A.K.: Measurement of progressive stress buildup during ion exchange in alkali aluminosilicate glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 238(3), 186–192 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garza-Méndez, F.J., Hinojosa-Rivera, M., Gómez, I., Sánchez, E.M.: Scaling properties of fracture surfaces on glass strengthened by ionic exchange. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254(5), 1471–1474 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karlsson, Stefan, Sharafat Ali, and Michael Strand. Chemical strengthening of flat glass by vapour deposition and in-line alkali metal ion exchange, (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karlsson, S., Jonson, B., Wondraczek, L.: Copper, silver, rubidium and caesium ion exchange in soda–lime–silica float glass by direct deposition and in line melting of salt pastes. Glass Techno. Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. Part A. 53(1), 1–7 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kese, K.O., Li, Z.C., Bergman, B.: Influence of residual stress on elastic modulus and hardness of soda-lime glass measured by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3109–3119 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yano, T., Nagano, T., Lee, J., Shibata, S., Yamane, M.: Cation site occupation by Ag+/Na+ ion-exchange in R2O–Al2O3–SiO2 glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 270(1–3), 163–171 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Braunger, M.L., Escanhoela, C.A., Ziemath, E.C.: Electrical conductivity of Ag–Na ion exchanged soda-lime glass. Solid State Ionics. 265, 55–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdem, I., Guldiren, D., Aydin, S.: Chemical tempering of soda lime silicate glasses by ion exchange process for the improvement of surface and bulk mechanical strength. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 473, 170–178 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haldimann, Matthias, Fracture strength of structural glass elements, (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shelby, J.E.: Introduction to glass science and technology. Royal Society of Chemistry (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jannotti, P., Subhash, G., Ifju, P., Kreski, P.K., Varshneya, A.K.: Influence of ultra-high residual compressive stress on the static and dynamic indentation response of a chemically strengthened glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32(8), 1551–1559 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gross, T.M., Price, J.J.: Vickers indentation cracking of ion-exchanged glasses: quasi-static vs. dynamic contact. Front. Mater. 4, 4 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sklyarevich, V., Mykhaylo, S.: Method for the chemical strengthening of glass, U.S. Patent 9,505,654, issued November 29, 2016Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Talimian, A., Sglavo, V.M.: Ion-exchange strengthening of borosilicate glass: influence of salt impurities and treatment temperature. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 456, 12–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pilkington, L.A.B.: Manufacture of flat glass. U.S. Patent No. 3,222,154. 7 Dec. 1965Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pilkington, L.A.B.: Review lecture. the float glass process. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 314(1516), 1–25 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goodman, O., Derby, B.: The mechanical properties of float glass surfaces measured by nanoindentation and acoustic microscopy. Acta Mater. 59(4), 1790–1799 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jiang, L., Guo, X., Li, X., Li, L., Zhang, G., Yan, Y.: Different K+–Na+ inter-diffusion kinetics between the air side and tin side of an ion-exchanged float aluminosilicate glass. Appl. Surf. Sci. 265, 889–894 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shen, J., Green, D.J., Pantano, C.G.: Control of concentration profiles in two step ion exchanged glasses. Phys. Chem. Glasses. 44(4), 284–292 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, X., Jiang, L., Wang, Y., Mohagheghian, I., Dear, J.P., Li, L., Yan, Y.: Correlation between K+-Na+ diffusion coefficient and flexural strength of chemically tempered aluminosilicate glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 471, 72–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wachtman, J.B., Roger Cannon, W., John Matthewson, M.: Mechanical properties of ceramics. John Wiley & Sons (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koike, A., Akiba, S., Sakagami, T., Hayashi, K., Ito, S.: Difference of cracking behavior due to Vickers indentation between physically and chemically tempered glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 358(24), 3438–3444 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bartholomew, R.F., Garfinkel, H.M.: Chemical strengthening of glass. Elast. Strength Glas. Glass Sci. Technol. 5, 217 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Macrelli, G., Isoclima, S. P.A.: Glass chemical strengthening by ion exchange, (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ingram, M.D., Davidson, J.E., Coats, A.M., Kamitsos, E.I., Kapoutsis, J.A.: Origins of anomalous mixed-alkali effects in ion-exchanged glasses. Glass Sci. Technol. Glastechnische Berichte. 73(4), 89–104 (2000)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Donald, I.W.: Methods for improving the mechanical properties of oxide glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 24(12), 4177–4208 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Varshneya, A.K.: Ion exchange: physical properties of ion-exchanged and melt-processed glasses differ. Glas. Res. 10, 21–26 (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weibull, W.: A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 18(3), 293–297 (1951)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Le Bourhis, E.: Glass: mechanics and technology. John Wiley & Sons (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kurkjian, C.R., Gupta, P.K., Brow, R.K.: The strength of silicate glasses: what do we know, what do we need to know? Int. J. Appl. Glas. Sci. 1(1), 27–37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pepi, J.W.: Strength properties of glass and ceramics. Spie Press (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tandon, R., Jill Glass, S.: Fracture initiation and fragmentation in chemically tempered glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(1), 285–295 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barsom, J.M.: Fracture of tempered glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51(2), 75–78 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Akeyoshi, K., Kanai, E.: Mechanical properties of tempered glass. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Glass Congress, vol. 14, pp. 80–85 (1965)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hill, M.J.C., Donald, I.W.: Stress profile characteristics and mechanical behaviour of chemically strengthened lithium magnesium aluminosilicate glasses. Glass Technol. 30(4), 123–127 (1989)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bouyne, E., Gaume, O.: Fragmentation of thin chemically tempered glass plates. Glass Technol. C. 43, 300 (2002)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Quinn, G.D., Quinn, G.D.: Fractography of ceramics and glasses. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Varshneya, A.K.: The physics of chemical strengthening of glass: room for a new view. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 356(44–49), 2289–2294 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shen, J., Green, D.J.: Prediction of stress profiles in ion exchanged glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 344(1–2), 79–87 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Li, X., Jiang, L., Zhang, X., Yan, Y.: Influence of residual compressive stress on nanoindentation response of ion-exchanged aluminosilicate float glass on air and tin sides. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 385, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ziemath, E.C., Saggioro, B.Z., Fossa, J.S.: Physical properties of silicate glasses doped with SnO2. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 351(52–54), 3870–3878 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hagan, J.T., Van Der Zwaag, S.: Plastic processes in a range of soda-lime-silica glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 64(1–2), 249–268 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Talimian, A., Sglavo, V.M.: Can annealing improve the chemical strengthening of thin borosilicate glass? J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 465, 1–7 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kolluru, P.V., Green, D.J., Pantano, C.G., Muhlstein, C.L.: Effects of surface chemistry on the nanomechanical properties of commercial float glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93(3), 838–847 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hand, R.J., Tadjiev, D.R.: Mechanical properties of silicate glasses as a function of composition. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 356(44–49), 2417–2423 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kato, Y., Yamazaki, H., Yoshida, S., Matsuoka, J.: Effect of densification on crack initiation under Vickers indentation test. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 356(35–36), 1768–1773 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yoshida, S., Hidaka, A., Matsuoka, J.: Crack initiation behavior of sodium aluminosilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 344(1–2), 37–43 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wada, M., Furukawa, H., Fujita, K.: Crack resistance of glass on Vickers indentation. In: Proc. Int. Congr. Glass 10th, vol. 11, pp. 39–46 (1974)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Price, J.J., Scott Glaesemann, G., Clark, D.A., Gross, T.M., Barefoot, K.L.: 69.3: a mechanics framework for ion-exchanged cover glass with a deep compression layer. In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1049–1051. Blackwell Publishing Ltd (2009)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tandon, R., Green, D.J., Cook, R.F.: Surface stress effects on indentation fracture sequences. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73(9), 2619–2627 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Morris, D.J., Myers, S.B., Cook, R.F.: Indentation crack initiation in ion-exchanged aluminosilicate glass. J. Mater. Sci. 39(7), 2399–2410 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sane, A.Y., Cooper, A.R.: Stress buildup and relaxation during ion exchange strengthening of glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70(2), 86–89 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Shaisha, E.E., Cooper, A.R.: Residual stress in singly and doubly ion-exchanged glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64(1), 34–36 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Moseler, D., Heide, G., Frischat, G.H.: Atomic force microscope study of the topography of float glasses and a model to explain the bloom effect. N. p., Germany (2002) WebGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang, R.-B.: Method for strengthening glass substrate and article manufactured by the same., U.S. Patent Application 13/928,519, filed July 3, 2014Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shen, J., et al.: Stress relaxation of a soda lime silicate glass below the glass transition temperature. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 324(3), 277–288 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Ceramic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aydın Süleyman Güzel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Meryem Sarıgüzel
    • 1
  • Melis Can Özdemir Yanık
    • 1
  • Esin Günay
    • 1
  • Metin Usta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yusuf Öztürk
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.TÜBİTAK, Marmara Research CenterMaterials InstituteKocaeliTurkey
  2. 2.Material Science and EngineeringGebze Technical UniversityKocaeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations