Simulating Zn, Cd and Ni Transport in Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Columns: Comparison of Alternative Models
This study compared four solute transport models for three heavy metals, i.e. Zn, Cd and Ni, in two disturbed and undisturbed loamy soil columns. The models include convection–dispersion equation (CDE), mobile–immobile model (MIM), fractional advection–dispersion equation (FADE) and the continuous time random walk model (CTRW). The experiments were carried out for each metal at three initial concentrations (C0 = 50, 100 and 150 mg L−1) and three replications in both soil columns. The results indicated that CDE, MIM, FADE and CTRW, with r2 > 0.98 and RMSE < 0.06, were capable of describing the BTCs of these heavy metals adequately. Compared to FADE and CTRW, CDE and MIM had better BTC fits with higher r2 values and lower RMSE values in both soil columns. The models in the disturbed soil had a better fit than the undisturbed soil. As C0 was increased, the retardation factor (R) of Zn, Cd and Ni decreased. Regardless of the type of soil column, R reveals the trend: Zn > Ni > Cd. The hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D) in the undisturbed soil was higher than the disturbed soil. The spreading parameter (β) of CTRW and the fractional differentiation orders (α) in FADE were approximately 1.0 and 1.7, respectively. Consequently, the heavy metal transport within both soil columns were anomalous or non-Fickian transport. However, CDE and MIM, which are based on Fickian diffusion law, were more appropriate for simulating heavy metal transport through two soil columns in comparison with CTRW and FADE.
Simulation of solute transport for three heavy metals, i.e. Zn, Cd and Ni.
Comparison of solute behavior in disturbed and undisturbed loamy soil columns.
Apply convection–dispersion equation (CDE), mobile–immobile model (MIM), fractional advection–dispersion equation (FADE) and the continuous time random walk model (CTRW).
Apply models in different initial concentration.
Sensitivity analysis of the most influential factors on the model output.
KeywordsFractional differentiation orders Heavy metals Hydrodynamic dispersion Retardation factor Spreading parameter introduction
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bear J (1972) Dynamic of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Benson DA (1998) The fractional advection–dispersion equation: development and application, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada, RenoGoogle Scholar
- Benson DA, Wheatcraft SW, Meerschaert MM (2000a) Application of fractional advection–dispersion equation. Water Resour Res 36(6):1403–1412Google Scholar
- Benson DA, Wheatcraft SW, Meerschaert MM (2000b) The fractional—order governing equation of Levy motion. Water Resour Res 36(6):1413–1423Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H (1995) On characterization of anomalous dispersion in porous and fractured media. Water Resour Res 31(6):1461–1466Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H (1997) Anomalous transport in random fracture networks. Phys Rev Lett 79(20):4038–4041Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H (1998) Theory of anomalous chemical transport in fracture networks. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Top 575:5858–5869Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H (2001) The role of probabilistic approaches to transport theory in heterogeneous media. Transp Porous Media 42:241–263Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H (2008) Exploring the nature of non-Fickian transport in laboratory experiments. Adv Water Resour 32(5):750–755Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Scher H, Silliman E (2000) Anomalous transport in laboratory-scale, heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 36(1):149–158Google Scholar
- Berkowitz B, Cortis A, Dentz M, Scher H (2006a) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as, a continuous time random walk. Rev Geophys 44(2):1–49Google Scholar
- Brummer GW (1986) Heavy metal species, mobility and availability in soils. In: Bemhard M, Brinckman FE, Sadler PJ (eds) The importance of chemical speciation in environmental processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–172Google Scholar
- Brusseau ML, Larsen T, Christensen TH (1991) Rate-limited sorption and non-equilibrium transport of organic chemicals in low organic carbon aquifer materials. Water Resour Res 27(6):1137–1145Google Scholar
- Camur MZ, Yazicigil H (2005) Laboratory determination of multicomponent effective diffusion coefficients for heavy metals in a compacted clay. Turk J Earth Sci 14(1):91–103Google Scholar
- Cortis A, Berkowitz B (2004) Anomalous transport in “classical soil and sand columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1539–1548Google Scholar
- Cortis A, Gallo C, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2004) Numerical simulation of non-Fickian transport in geological formations with multiple-scale heterogeneities. Water Resour Res 40(4):1–16Google Scholar
- Huang G, Huang Q, Zhan H, Chen J, Xiong Y, Feng S (2005) Modeling containment transport in homogeneous porous media with fractional advection–dispersion equation. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 48:295–302Google Scholar
- Huang G, Huang Q, Zhan H (2006) Evidence of one-dimensional scale-dependent fractional advection–dispersion. J Contam Hydrol 85(1–2):53–71Google Scholar
- Jury WA (1982) Simulate of solute transport using a transfer functionmodel. Water Resour Res 18:363–368Google Scholar
- Levy M, Berkowitz B (2003) Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. J Contam Hydrol 64:203–226Google Scholar
- Li N, Ren L (2009) Application of continuous time random walk theory to non-equilibrium transport in soil. J Contam Hydrol 108(3):134–151Google Scholar
- Liu HF, Genard M, Guichard S, Bertin N (2007) Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes. J Exp Bot 58(13):3567–3580Google Scholar
- Mao M, Ren L (2004) Simulating non-equilibrium transport of atrazine through saturated soil. Groundwater 42:500–508Google Scholar
- Montroll EW, Weiss JGH (1965) Random walks on lattices. II. Math Phys 6:167Google Scholar
- Pechepsky Y, Benon D, Rawls W (2000) Simulating scale-dependent solute transport in soils with the fractional advective–dispersive equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(3):1234–1243Google Scholar
- Saadati Z, Delbari M, Panahi M, Amiri E (2018) Simulation of sugar beet growth under water stress using AquaCrop model. J Water Soil Resour Conserv 7(3):1–18Google Scholar
- Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh SH (2011) Isotherm and kinetic studies on adsorption of Pb, Zn and Cu by kaolinite. Casp J Environ Sci 9(2):243–255Google Scholar
- Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh SH (2015) Modeling contaminant transport in saturated soil column with the continuous time random walk. J Porous Media 18(12):1–6Google Scholar
- Simunek J, Jarvis N, Van Genuchten M, Garenas A (2003) Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in vadose zone. J Hydrol 272:14–35Google Scholar
- Tiwari PR, Bala Ramudha P, Srivastava RK, Gupta MK (2007) Sorption and desorption studies of metallic zinc on an alluvial soil. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 3:139–146Google Scholar
- Toride N, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (1995) The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments. US Salinity Lab report 137. GEBJ Salinity Laboratory—USDA-ARS, Riverside, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Toride N, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT (1999) The CXTFIT Cod for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments. Version 2.0. Research report 137. US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Reverside, CAGoogle Scholar
- Tyler LD, McBride MB (1982) Mobility and extractability of cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc in organic and mineral soil columns. Soil Sci 134:198–205Google Scholar
- Van Genuchten MTh, Wieregna PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40(4):473–480Google Scholar
- Van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ (1977) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: II. Experimental evaluation with tritium (3H2O). Soil Sci Soc Am J 41(2):272–278Google Scholar
- Ventrella D, Mohnaty BP, Simunek J, Losavio N, Vam Genuchten MTh (2000) Water and chloride transport in a fine-textured soil: field experiments and modeling. Soil Sci Soc Am 165(8):624–631Google Scholar
- Xiong Y, Huang G, Huang Q (2006) Modeling solute transport in one-dimensional homogeneous and heterogeneous soil columns with continuous time random walk. J Contam Hydrol 86(3–4):163–175Google Scholar