Advertisement

International Journal of Environmental Research

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 185–198 | Cite as

Treatment of Simulated Oil and Gas Produced Water via Pilot-Scale Rhizofiltration and Constructed Wetlands

  • Lucas Clay
  • John PichtelEmail author
Research Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Extraction of petroleum, natural gas and coal bed methane is often accompanied by the release of large volumes of produced water (PW). Untreated PW poses environmental and health risks; however, there are opportunities for beneficial reuse if potentially hazardous constituents are removed. In a hydroponic system, four plant species (cattail, Typha latifolia; sedge, Carex blanda, sunflower, Helianthus annuus; and Indian mustard, Brassica juncea) were assessed for tolerance to, and rhizofiltration of, metals occurring in synthetic PW. In a separate study, cattail and sedge were grown in a pilot-scale constructed wetland containing either soil or peat and tested for the removal of PW metals. After reaction with PW for 10 weeks in the hydroponic system, Indian mustard was the most effective in removal of Na. All species accumulated more metals in roots compared to aboveground shoots. Cattail roots had the highest BCF for Cr (1156), Cu (2911) and Cd (6047). Mustard roots had a high BCF for Cd (3485). Mustard, cattail and sedge all had TF values < 1, indicating their potential as metal excluders for produced water. In the constructed wetlands, cattail shoots were highly effective for the removal of Na and Li (BCF > 100). TF values for most metals were low. Metal removal, as indicated by tissue metal concentration and BCF, was typically much higher using constructed wetlands compared with rhizofiltration. Based on these data, constructed wetlands may serve as a low-cost, environmentally benign method for the treatment of PW. The reported study may be of practical value to oil and gas production industries that plan to recycle or properly dispose large quantities of oil and gas production wastewater.

Article Highlights

  • A pilot-scale constructed wetland and a hydroponic apparatus were used to evaluate the ability of plants for uptake and accumulation of selected metals from simulated produced water.

  • Cattail (Typha latifolia), sedge (Carex blanda), sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) accumulated more metals in roots compared to aboveground shoots.

  • Cattail, sedge and mustard had transfer factors < 1, indicating their potential as metal excluders for produced water.

  • Metal removal by plants, as indicated by tissue metal concentrations and bioconcentration factor, was typically much greater using constructed wetlands compared with rhizofiltration.

Keywords

Produced water Rhizofiltration Hydroponics Constructed wetlands Metals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support from the Ball State University Honors College is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aini Syuhaida AW, Norkhadijah S, Praveena SM, Suriyani A (2014) The comparison of phytoremediation abilities of water mimosa and water hyacinth. ARPN J Sci Technol 4:722–731Google Scholar
  2. Alalade O, Ferguson J, Pichtel J (2017) Treatment of oil and gas production wastewater using Typha latifolia in a pilot-scale constructed wetland. Environ Biotechnol 13(1):1–10Google Scholar
  3. Allen SE, Grimshaw MH, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 386Google Scholar
  4. Aqwatec (2015) Produced Water Beneficial Use Case Studies, Produced Water Treatment and Beneficial Use Information Center, 2015, http://aqwatec.mines.edu/producedwater/assessbu/case/. Accessed 27 Jan 2017
  5. Arroyo P, Ansola G, de Luis E (2010) Effectiveness of a full-scale constructed wetland for the removal of metals from domestic wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 210:473–481Google Scholar
  6. Bakar AFA, Yusoff I, Fatt NT, Othman F, Ashraf MA (2013) Arsenic, zinc, and aluminium removal from gold mine wastewater effluents and accumulation by submerged aquatic plants (Cabomba piauhyensis, Egeria densa, and Hydrilla verticillata). Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/890803 Google Scholar
  7. Baker AJM (1981) Accumulators and excluders—strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3:643–654Google Scholar
  8. Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Hajar ASM (1994) Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in British populations of the metallophyte Thlaspi caerulescens J&C Presl (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 127:61–68Google Scholar
  9. Benko KL, Drewes JE (2008) Produced water in the western United States: geographical distribution, occurrence, and composition. Environ Eng Sci 25(2):239–246Google Scholar
  10. Bergman A, Heindel JJ, Jobling S, Kidd KA, and Zoeller RT (2013) State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals. World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/ceh/publications/endocrine/en/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  11. Black CA (1965) Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloomfield C (1981) The translocation of metals in soils. In: Greenland DJ, Hayes MHB (eds) The Chemistry of Soil Processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Borkert CM, Cox FR, Tucker M (1998) Zinc and copper toxicity in peanut, soybean, rice, and corn in soil mixtures. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29(19–20):2991–3005Google Scholar
  14. Branquinho C, Serrano HC, Pinto MJ, Martins-Loucao MA (2007) Revisiting the plant hyperaccumulation criteria to rare plants and earth abundant elements. Environ Pollut 14:437–443Google Scholar
  15. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45Google Scholar
  16. Brisson J, Chazarenc F (2009) Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Sci Tot Environ 407:3923–3930Google Scholar
  17. Brown SL, Chaney RL, Angle JS, Baker AJM (1994) Phytomediation potential of Thlaspi caerulescens and bladder campion for zinc-and cadmium-contaminated soil. J Environ Qual 23:1151–1157Google Scholar
  18. Burton GA, Scott KJ (1992) Assessing contaminated aquatic sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:2068–2075Google Scholar
  19. Cervantes C, Campos-Garcı́a J, Devars S, Gutiérrez-Corona F, Loza-Tavera H, Carlos Torres-Guzmán JC, Moreno-Sánchez R (2001) Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25(3):335–347Google Scholar
  20. Chaudhuri P, Nath B, Birch G (2014) Accumulation of trace metals in grey mangrove Avicennia marina fine nutritive roots: the role of rhizosphere processes. Mar Pollut Bull 79:284–292Google Scholar
  21. Chayapan P, Kruatrachue M, Meetam M, Pokethitiyook P (2015) Phytoremediation potential of Cd and Zn by wetland plants, Colocasia esculenta L. Schott., Cyperus malaccensis Lam., and Typha angustifolia L., grown in hydroponics. J Environ Biol 36(5):1179–1183Google Scholar
  22. Clark CE, Veil JA (2009) Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States. Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, ANL/EVS/R-09/1, pp. 64Google Scholar
  23. Clay LH, Pichtel J (2018) Plants and soil amendments for remediation of soil affected by synthetic oil and gas production wastewater. Environ Biotechnol 13(2):1–13Google Scholar
  24. Deng H, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2004) Accumulation of lead, zinc, copper and cadmium by 12 wetland plant species thriving in metal-contaminated sites in China. Environ Pollut 132:29–40Google Scholar
  25. Elliott EG, Ettinger AS, Leaderer BP, Bracken MB, Deziel NC (2017) A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27:90–99Google Scholar
  26. Ernst W, Verkleij JA, Schat H (1992) Metal tolerance in plants. Acta Bot Neer 41:229–248Google Scholar
  27. Essah PA, Davenport R, Tester M (2003) Sodium influx and accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133(1):307–318Google Scholar
  28. Fontenot BE, Hunt LR, Hildenbrand ZL et al (2013) An evaluation of water quality in private drinking water wells near natural gas extraction sites in the Barnett shale formation. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):10032–10040Google Scholar
  29. Fritioff A, Greger M (2006) Uptake and distribution of Zn, Cu, Cd and Pb in an aquatic plant Potamogeton natans. Chemosphere 63:220–227Google Scholar
  30. Greger M (2004) Metal availability, uptake, transport and accumulation in plants. In: Prasad MNV (ed) Heavy metal stress in plants from biomolecules to ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Herath H, Bandara DC, Weerasinghe PA, Iqbal MC, Wijayawardhana HCD (2014) Effect of cadmium on growth parameters and plant accumulation in different rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res 25:532–542Google Scholar
  32. Huang R, Tu JC (2001) Effects of nutrient solution pH on the survival and transmission of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis in hydroponically grown tomatoes. Plant Pathol 50(4):503–508Google Scholar
  33. Igunnu ET, Chen GZ (2014) Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low Carbon Technol 9(3):157–177Google Scholar
  34. Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA (2008) Modified nitric acid plant tissue digest method. Communic Soil Sci Plant Anal 31(15–16):2473–2482.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620009370602 Google Scholar
  35. Jakl M, Dytrtová JJ, Miholová A, Kolihová D, Száková J, Tlustoš P (2009) Passive diffusion assessment of cadmium and lead accumulation by plants in hydroponic systems. Chem Spec Bioavail 21:111–120Google Scholar
  36. John MK (1972) Cadmium adsorption maxima of soil as measured by the Langmuir isotherm. Can J Soil Sci 52:343Google Scholar
  37. John R, Ahmad P, Gadgil K, Sharma S (2012) Heavy metal toxicity: effect on plant growth, biochemical parameters and metal accumulation by Brassica juncea L. Int J Plant Prod 3(3):65–76Google Scholar
  38. Kabata-Pendias A (2010) Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Kadlec R, Roy S, Munson R, Charlton S, Brownlie W (2010) Water quality performance of treatment wetlands in the Imperial Valley, California. Ecol Engin 36:1093–1107Google Scholar
  40. Kaewtubtim P, Meeinkuirt W, Seepom S, Pichtel J (2016) Heavy metal phytoremediation potential of mangrove plant species of Pattani Bay, Thailand. Appl Ecol 14(1):367–382Google Scholar
  41. Kassotis CD, Tillitt DE, Lin CH, McElroy JA, and Nagel SC (2015) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and oil and natural gas operations: potential environmental contamination and recommendations to assess complex environmental mixtures. Environmental Health Perspectives, https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/advpub/2015/8/ehp.1409535.acco.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2017
  42. Khatib Z, Verbeek P (2003) Water to value- produced water management for sustainable field development of mature and green fields. J Pet Technol 55:26–28Google Scholar
  43. Kim KR, Owens G, Naidu R, Kim KH (2008) Influence of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) on rhizosphere chemistry in long-term contaminated soils. Kor J Soil Sci Fert 41:55–64Google Scholar
  44. Klassen SP, McLean JE, Grossi PR, Sims RC (2000) Fate and behavior of lead in soils planted with metal-resistant species (River Birch and Smallwing Sedge). J Environ Qual 29:1826–1834Google Scholar
  45. Klucakova M (2012) Comparative study of binding behaviour of Cu(II) with humic acid and simple organic compounds by ultrasound spectrometry. Open Colloid Sci J 5:5–12Google Scholar
  46. Lacerda LD, Fernandez MA, Calazans CF, Tanizaki KF (1992) Bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments of two coastal lagoons in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Hydrobiol 228:65–70Google Scholar
  47. Lacerda LD, Carvalho CEV, Tanizaki KF, Ovalle ARC, Rezende CE (1993) The biogeochemistry and trace metals distribution of mangrove rhizospheres. Biotropica 25:252–257Google Scholar
  48. Lasat MM, Pence NS, Garvin DF, Ebbs SD, Kochian LV (2000) Molecular physiology of zinc transport in the Zn hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. J Exp Bot 51:71–79Google Scholar
  49. Lefévre I (2007). Investigation of three Mediterranean plant species suspected to accumulate and tolerance high cadmium and zinc levels. PhD Dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  50. Lepp NW, Dickinson NM (1987) Partitioning and transport of copper in various components of Kenyan Coffea arabica stands. In: Coughtrey PJ, Martin MH, Unsworth M (eds) Pollutant transport and fate in ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Li J, Yu H, Luan Y (2015) Meta-analysis of the copper, zinc and cadmium absorption capacities of aquatic plants in heavy metal-polluted water. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 12:14958–14973Google Scholar
  52. Liu L, Sun H, Chen J, Zhang Y, Li D, Li C (2014) Effects of cadmium (Cd) on seedling growth traits and photosynthesis parameters in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Omics J 7:284–290Google Scholar
  53. Liu JT, Sun JJ, Fang SW, Han L, Feng Q, Hu F (2016) Nutrient removal capacities of four submerged macrophytes in the Poyang lake basin. Appl Ecol Environ Res 14:107–124Google Scholar
  54. Lux A, Sottníková A, Opatrná J, Greger M (2004) Differences in structure of adventitious roots in Salix clones with contrasting characteristics of cadmium accumulation and sensitivity. Physiol Plant 120:537–545Google Scholar
  55. Maguire-Boyle SJ, Barron AR (2014) Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells. Environ Sci Proc Impact 16:2237–2248Google Scholar
  56. Maine MA, Sune N, Hadad H, Sanchez G, Bonetto C (2006) Nutrient and metal removal in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment from a metallurgic industry. Ecol Eng 26:341–347Google Scholar
  57. Marcellus (2010) List of 78 chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid in Pennsylvania. http://marcellusdrilling.com/2010/06/list-of-78-chemicals-used-in-hydraulic-fracturing-fluid-in-pennsylvania/. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
  58. Marchand C, Allenbach M, Lallier-Vergès E (2011) Relationships between heavy metals distribution and organic matter cycling in mangrove sediments (Conception Bay, New Caledonia). Geoderma 160:444–456Google Scholar
  59. Marchiol L, Assolari A, Sacco P, Zerbi G (2004) Phytoextraction of heavy metals by canola (Brassica napus) and radish (Raphanus sativus) grown on multicontaminated soil. Environ Pollut 132:21–27Google Scholar
  60. Mateos-Naranjo E, Castellanos E, Perez-Martin AM (2014) Zinc tolerance and accumulation in the halophytic species Juncus acutus. Env Exp Bot 100:114–121Google Scholar
  61. McCauley A, Jones C, Jacobsen J (2009) Plant nutrient functions and deficiency and toxicity symptoms. In: Nutrient management module 9, Montana State University, BozemanGoogle Scholar
  62. McGrath SP (1998) Phytoextraction for soil remediation. In: Brooks RR (ed) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 261–287Google Scholar
  63. McNaughton SJ, Folsom TC, Lee T, Park F, Price C, Roeder D, Schmitz J, Stockwell C (1974) Heavy metal tolerance in Typha latifolia without the evolution of tolerant races. Ecol 55:1163–1165Google Scholar
  64. Meeinkuirt W, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Tanhan P, Chaiyarat R (2012) Phytostabilization of lead by various tree species using pot and field trial experiments. Int J Phytorem 14:925–938Google Scholar
  65. Meeinkuirt W, Kruatrachue M, Pichtel J, Phusantisampan T, Saengwilai P (2016) Influence of organic amendments on phytostabilization of Cd-contaminated soil by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Sci Asia 42:83–91Google Scholar
  66. Mendez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environment. Rev Environ Sci Biotech 14:277–282Google Scholar
  67. Miretzky P, Saralegui A, Cirelli AF (2004) Aquatic macrophytes potential for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Chemosphere 57:997–1005Google Scholar
  68. Mojiri A, Aziz HA, Zahed MA, Aziz SQ, Selamat MRB (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals from urban waste leachate by southern cattail (Typha domingensis). Int J Sci Res Environ Sci 1(4):63–70Google Scholar
  69. Murray Gulde C, Heatley JE, Karanfil T, Rodgers JH Jr, Myers JE (2003) Performance of a hybrid reverse osmosis-constructed wetland treatment system for brackish oil field produced water. Water Res 37:705–713Google Scholar
  70. Murray H, Thompson K, Macfie SM (2009) Site- and species-specific patterns of metal bioavailability in edible plants. Bot 87:702–711Google Scholar
  71. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (2015) Fracking’s most wanted: lifting the veil on oil and gas company spills and violations. IP:15-01-A, April 2015, http://www.nrdc.org/land/drilling/files/fracking-company-violations-IP.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2018
  72. Niu ZX, Sun LN, Sun TH, Li YS, Hong WA (2007) Evaluation of phytoextracting cadmium and lead by sunflower, ricinus, alfalfa and mustard in hydroponic culture. J Environ Sci 19(8):961–967Google Scholar
  73. Nouri J, Khorasani N, Lorestani B, Karami M, Hassani AH, Yousefi N (2009) Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):315–323Google Scholar
  74. O’Rourke D, Connolly S (2003) Just oil? The distribution of environmental and social impacts of oil production and consumption. Ann Rev Environ Res 28:587–617Google Scholar
  75. Odjegba VJ, Fasidi IO (2007) Phytoremediation of heavy metals by Eichhornia crassipes. Environmentalist 27:349–355Google Scholar
  76. Osmolovskaya NG, Kurilenko VV (2001) Biogeochemical aspects of heavy metals phytoindication in urban aquatic systems. In: Weber J (ed) Biogeochemical processes and cycling of elements in the environment. Polish Society of Humic Substances, Wroclaw, pp 217–218Google Scholar
  77. Otero XL, Ferreira TO, Vida-Torrado P, Macias F (2006) Spatial variation in pore water geochemistry in a mangrove system (Pai Matos island, Cananeia-Brazil). Appl Geochem 21:2171–2186Google Scholar
  78. Otero A, Fiol S, Antelo J, and Arce F (2015) Studying and modeling the effect of organic matter on the sorption of inorganic ions on goethite. Goldschmidt. Abstracts, http://goldschmidt.info/2015/uploads/abstracts/finalPDFs/2365.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2015
  79. Panich-Pat T, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Upatham ES, Srinives P, Lanza GR (2004) Removal of lead from contaminated soils by Typha angustifolia. Water Air Soil Pollut 155:159–171Google Scholar
  80. Papaevangelou VA, Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2017) Chromium removal from wastewater using HSF and VF pilot-scale constructed wetlands: overall performance, and fate and distribution of this element within the wetland environment. Chemosphere 168:716–730Google Scholar
  81. Peng D, Shafi M, Wang Y, Li S, Yan W, Chen J, Ye Z, Liu D (2015) Effect of Zn stresses on physiology, growth, Zn accumulation, and chlorophyll of Phyllostachys pubescens. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:14983–14992Google Scholar
  82. Phaenark C, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Ngernsansaruay C (2009) Cd and Zn accumulation in plants from the Padaeng zinc mine area. Int J Phytorem 11:479–495Google Scholar
  83. Phusantisampan T, Meeinkuirt W, Saengwilai P, Pichtel J, Chaiyarat R (2016) Phytostabilization potential of two ecotypes of Vetiveria zizanioides in cadmium-contaminated soils: greenhouse and field experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20027–20038Google Scholar
  84. Pichtel J (2016) Oil and gas production wastewater: soil contamination and pollution prevention. Appl Environ Soil Sci. p. 1-24. downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aess/aip/2707989.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  85. Pinto AP, Mota AM, deVarennes A, Pinto FC (2004) Influence of organic matter on the uptake of cadmium, zinc, copper and iron by sorghum plants. Sci Total Environ 326:239–247Google Scholar
  86. Pip E, Stepaniuk J (1992) Cadmium, copper and lead in sediments. Arch fur Hydrobiol 124:337–355Google Scholar
  87. Raskin I, Ensley B (2000) Phytoremediation of toxic metals using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  88. Rezvani M, Zaefarian F (2011) Bioaccumulation and translocation factors of cadmium and lead in Aeluropus littoralis. Austral J Agric Eng 2(4):114–119Google Scholar
  89. Saengwilai P, Meeinkuirt W, Pichtel J, Koedrith P (2017) Influence of amendments on Cd and Zn uptake and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:15756–15767Google Scholar
  90. Salt DE, Prince RC, Pickering IJ, Raskin I (1995) Mechanisms of cadmium mobility and accumulation in Indian mustard. Plant Physiol 109(4):1427–1433Google Scholar
  91. Sasmaz A, Obek E, Hasar H (2008) The accumulation of heavy metals in Typha latifolia L. grown in a stream carrying secondary effluent. Ecol Eng 33:278–284Google Scholar
  92. Simon L, Prokisch J, Kovács B, Gy˝ori Z (1998) Phytoextraction of heavy metals from a galvanic mud contaminated soil. In: Filep G (ed) Soil Pollution. Agricultural University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, pp 289–295Google Scholar
  93. Skinner K, Wright N, Porter-Goff E (2007) Mercury uptake and accumulation by four species of aquatic plants. Environ Pollut 145:234–237Google Scholar
  94. Sparks DL (1996) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. In: Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 555–574Google Scholar
  95. Sricoth T, Meeinkuirt W, Pichtel J, Taeprayoon P, Saengwilai P (2017) Synergistic phytoremediation of wastewater by two aquatic plants (Typha angustifolia and Eichhornia crassipes) and potential as biomass fuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0813-5 Google Scholar
  96. Sricoth T, Meeinkuirt W, Saengwilai P, Pichtel J, Taeprayoon P (2018) Aquatic plants for phytostabilization of cadmium and zinc in hydroponic experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1714-y Google Scholar
  97. Street RA, Kulkarni MG, Stirk WA, Southway C, Abdillahi HS, Chinsamy M, Staden JV (2009) Effect of cadmium uptake and accumulation on growth and antibacterial activity of Merwilla plumbea—an extensively used medicinal plant in South Africa. S Afr J Bot 75:611–616Google Scholar
  98. Sundaravadivel M, Vigneswaran S (2001) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 31(4):351–409Google Scholar
  99. Szucs J (2011) Plant uptake study: The hyperaccumulating and remediating potential of three plant species. MS thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  100. Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Engin A.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161 Google Scholar
  101. Tanhan P, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Chaiyarat P (2007) Uptake and accumulation of cadmium, lead and zinc by Siam weed [Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson]. Chemosphere 68:323–329Google Scholar
  102. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2015) Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid. Data from the FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry 1.0. EPA/601/R-14/003. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  103. USDA-NRCS (US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2015) A Handbook of Constructed Wetlands, p 6https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/constructed-wetlands-handbook.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2018
  104. Vaculík M, Konlechner C, Langer I, Adlassnig W, Puschenreiter M, Lux A, Hauser M (2012) Root anatomy and element distribution vary between two Salix caprea isolates with different Cd accumulation capacities. Environ Pollut 163:117–126Google Scholar
  105. Veil JA, Puder MG, Elcock D et al (2004) A white paper describing produced water from production of crude oil, natural gas, and coal bed methane. US. DOE, Argonne National Laboratory, ArgonneGoogle Scholar
  106. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37Google Scholar
  107. Wallace A, Romney EM, Cha JW, Chaudhry FM (1977) Lithium toxicity in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 8:773Google Scholar
  108. Wang S, Shi X, Sun H, Chen Y, Pan H, Yang X, Rafiq T (2014) Variations in metal tolerance and accumulation in three hydroponically cultivated varieties of Salix integra treated with lead. PLoS One 9:e108568Google Scholar
  109. Warner NR, Jackson RB, Darrah TH et al (2012) Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 109(30):11961–11966Google Scholar
  110. Wei CY, Chen TB, Huang ZC (2002) Cretan bake (Pteris cretica L.): an arsenic-accumulating plant. Acta Ecol Sin 22:777–782Google Scholar
  111. Weis JS, Weis P (2004) Metal uptake, transport and release by wetland plants: implications for phytoremediation and restoration review. Environ Internat 30:685–700Google Scholar
  112. Wells N, Whitton JS (1972) A pedochemical survey, Lithium. N Z J Sci 15:90Google Scholar
  113. Xiong J, Lu H, Lu K, Duan Y, An L, Zhu C (2009) Cadmium decreases crown root number by decreasing endogenous nitric oxide, which is indispensable for crown root primordia initiation in rice seedlings. Planta 230:599–610Google Scholar
  114. Ye ZH, Baker AJM, Wong MH, Willis AJ (1997) Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance, uptake and accumulation by Typha latifolia. New Phytol 136:469–480Google Scholar
  115. Zancheta ACF, De Abreu CA, Zambrosi FCB, Erismann ND, Lagôa AMM (2015) Cadmium accumulation by Jack-bean and sorghum in hydroponic culture. Int J Phytorem 17:298–303Google Scholar
  116. Zhang BY, Zheng JS, Sharp RG (2010) Phytoremediation in engineered wetlands: mechanisms and applications. Proc Environ Sci 2:1315–1325Google Scholar
  117. Zhao FJ, Lombi E, McGrath SP (2003) Assessing the potential for zinc and cadmium phytoremediation with the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 249:37–43Google Scholar
  118. Zhou LX, Wong JWC (2001) Effect of dissolved organic matter from sludge and sludge compost on soil copper sorption. J Environ Qual 30:878–883Google Scholar
  119. Zimdahl RL (1975) Entry and movement in vegetation of lead derived from air and soil sources. In: Paper presented at 68th annual meeting of the air pollution control association, Boston, MA, June 15, 1975Google Scholar
  120. Zu YQ, Li Y, Chen JJ, Chen HY, Qin L, Schvartz C (2005) Hyperaccumulation of Pb, Zn and Cd in herbaceous grown on lead-zinc mining area in Yunnan, China. Environ Internat 31:755–762Google Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Tehran 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Environmental ConservationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Natural Resources and Environmental ManagementBall State UniversityMuncieUSA

Personalised recommendations